Paper-based reaction devices as accelerated platforms in forced degradation studies

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2025.104111
Airton G. Salles Jr. , Willian R. de Araujo , Manoel T. Rodrigues Jr. , Bruno B. Guidotti
{"title":"Paper-based reaction devices as accelerated platforms in forced degradation studies","authors":"Airton G. Salles Jr. ,&nbsp;Willian R. de Araujo ,&nbsp;Manoel T. Rodrigues Jr. ,&nbsp;Bruno B. Guidotti","doi":"10.1016/j.xphs.2025.104111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The stability of pharmaceutical compounds is a central concern in drug development, as degradation can compromise both efficacy and safety. Conventional forced degradation studies, while effective, are often time-consuming and resource-intensive, highlighting the need for accessible and high-throughput alternatives. In this study, we introduce paper-based reaction devices (PRDs) as an innovative platform for accelerating drug degradation experiments. Strips of cellulose paper were employed as reactive microenvironments to investigate the degradation of two model drugs, cyclobenzaprine (CBP) and deflazacort (DFL), under oxidative, acidic, basic, and metal-ion stress conditions. Chromatographic analysis using HPLC-PDA and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) revealed that the paper interface preserved mechanistic relevance, yielding degradation profiles consistent with solution-based studies while markedly enhancing degradation rates. Mechanistic trends were consistent with the hypothesis that hydroxyl-rich cellulose surfaces promote kinetic amplification through hydrogen-bond-mediated microconfinement. Mass-balance assessments demonstrated reproducibility and validated the reliability of the approach across stress conditions. The PRD approach is proposed as an investigational and preformulation-level tool for early-phase stability assessment, complementing rather than replacing conventional stress testing methods. Its simple, robust, and high-throughput format offers a valuable alternative for rapid stability evaluation during the early stages of drug development and formulation design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"115 2","pages":"Article 104111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022354925005659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stability of pharmaceutical compounds is a central concern in drug development, as degradation can compromise both efficacy and safety. Conventional forced degradation studies, while effective, are often time-consuming and resource-intensive, highlighting the need for accessible and high-throughput alternatives. In this study, we introduce paper-based reaction devices (PRDs) as an innovative platform for accelerating drug degradation experiments. Strips of cellulose paper were employed as reactive microenvironments to investigate the degradation of two model drugs, cyclobenzaprine (CBP) and deflazacort (DFL), under oxidative, acidic, basic, and metal-ion stress conditions. Chromatographic analysis using HPLC-PDA and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) revealed that the paper interface preserved mechanistic relevance, yielding degradation profiles consistent with solution-based studies while markedly enhancing degradation rates. Mechanistic trends were consistent with the hypothesis that hydroxyl-rich cellulose surfaces promote kinetic amplification through hydrogen-bond-mediated microconfinement. Mass-balance assessments demonstrated reproducibility and validated the reliability of the approach across stress conditions. The PRD approach is proposed as an investigational and preformulation-level tool for early-phase stability assessment, complementing rather than replacing conventional stress testing methods. Its simple, robust, and high-throughput format offers a valuable alternative for rapid stability evaluation during the early stages of drug development and formulation design.
纸基反应装置在强制降解研究中的加速平台。
药物化合物的稳定性是药物开发中的一个中心问题,因为降解会损害疗效和安全性。传统的强制降解研究虽然有效,但往往耗时且资源密集,因此需要可获得的高通量替代品。在这项研究中,我们介绍了纸基反应装置(PRDs)作为加速药物降解实验的创新平台。以纤维素纸条为反应微环境,研究了两种模型药物环苯扎林(cyclobenzapprine, CBP)和地氮唑特(deflazacort, DFL)在氧化、酸性、碱性和金属离子胁迫条件下的降解。使用HPLC-PDA和高分辨率质谱(HRMS)的色谱分析显示,纸界面保持了机制相关性,产生的降解谱与基于溶液的研究一致,同时显著提高了降解率。机理趋势与假设一致,即富含羟基的纤维素表面通过氢键介导的微约束促进动力学放大。质量平衡评估证明了再现性,并验证了该方法在各种应力条件下的可靠性。PRD方法被建议作为早期稳定性评估的研究和预制定水平的工具,补充而不是取代传统的压力测试方法。其简单、稳健和高通量的格式为药物开发和配方设计早期阶段的快速稳定性评估提供了有价值的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
367
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences will publish original research papers, original research notes, invited topical reviews (including Minireviews), and editorial commentary and news. The area of focus shall be concepts in basic pharmaceutical science and such topics as chemical processing of pharmaceuticals, including crystallization, lyophilization, chemical stability of drugs, pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, pharmacodynamics, pro-drug developments, metabolic disposition of bioactive agents, dosage form design, protein-peptide chemistry and biotechnology specifically as these relate to pharmaceutical technology, and targeted drug delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书