{"title":"Scenario-Focused Decision Analysis: Discussion and Research Questions","authors":"Simon French","doi":"10.1002/mcda.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scenarios have been used in risk management for many years, first in scenario planning to identify risks and their possible impacts, which may then be explored using quantitative risk analysis. Qualitative scenario planning has been used in supporting decision-making and strategic deliberations generally, and as a tool in problem formulation for quantitative multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) studies. Until relatively recently, however, scenario thinking has not been more fully combined with quantitative MCDA studies. There are issues to overcome in forming meaningful quantitative comparisons between scenarios and in presenting the results to decision-makers in ways that help them reach a conclusion which they judge to be requisite. This paper discusses these issues and offers a research agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcda.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scenarios have been used in risk management for many years, first in scenario planning to identify risks and their possible impacts, which may then be explored using quantitative risk analysis. Qualitative scenario planning has been used in supporting decision-making and strategic deliberations generally, and as a tool in problem formulation for quantitative multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) studies. Until relatively recently, however, scenario thinking has not been more fully combined with quantitative MCDA studies. There are issues to overcome in forming meaningful quantitative comparisons between scenarios and in presenting the results to decision-makers in ways that help them reach a conclusion which they judge to be requisite. This paper discusses these issues and offers a research agenda.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.