Effects of 2 Interventions on the Acceptability and Usability of a Sensing Glove for Measuring Force-Time Characteristics of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Crossover Study

Journal of chiropractic medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2025.08.002
Marie-Andrée Mercier DC , Martin Descarreaux DC, PhD , Andréanne K. Blanchette pht, PhD , Isabelle Pagé DC, PhD
{"title":"Effects of 2 Interventions on the Acceptability and Usability of a Sensing Glove for Measuring Force-Time Characteristics of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Crossover Study","authors":"Marie-Andrée Mercier DC ,&nbsp;Martin Descarreaux DC, PhD ,&nbsp;Andréanne K. Blanchette pht, PhD ,&nbsp;Isabelle Pagé DC, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess chiropractors’ and chiropractic students’ acceptability of a sensing glove system for measuring Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) force-time characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of 2 interventions in improving their acceptability and perceived usability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixteen participants were recruited and initially rated their agreement with 12 statements about the acceptability of the sensing glove system. They then underwent 2 interventions designed to improve their acceptability of the system in a random order: a 7-minute informational video and a 20-minute supervised practice session. After each intervention, participants reassessed their agreement with the acceptability statements and provided feedback on the system’s usability through 10 additional statements. Data analysis used McNemar and Cochran’s Q tests to assess the interventions’ effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The practice session led to a significantly higher number of participants agreeing with 4 more acceptability statements than at baseline, and with 1 more statement than after the video intervention. Conversely, the video intervention showed an increased proportion of agreement for only 1 statement compared to the baseline. Furthermore, the practice session resulted in a higher proportion of participants agreeing with 2 usability statements compared to the video intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study highlights the importance of supervised hands-on practice in enhancing the acceptability and willingness of chiropractors and chiropractic students to adopt a force-sensing system in their clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370725000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to assess chiropractors’ and chiropractic students’ acceptability of a sensing glove system for measuring Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) force-time characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of 2 interventions in improving their acceptability and perceived usability.

Methods

Sixteen participants were recruited and initially rated their agreement with 12 statements about the acceptability of the sensing glove system. They then underwent 2 interventions designed to improve their acceptability of the system in a random order: a 7-minute informational video and a 20-minute supervised practice session. After each intervention, participants reassessed their agreement with the acceptability statements and provided feedback on the system’s usability through 10 additional statements. Data analysis used McNemar and Cochran’s Q tests to assess the interventions’ effectiveness.

Results

The practice session led to a significantly higher number of participants agreeing with 4 more acceptability statements than at baseline, and with 1 more statement than after the video intervention. Conversely, the video intervention showed an increased proportion of agreement for only 1 statement compared to the baseline. Furthermore, the practice session resulted in a higher proportion of participants agreeing with 2 usability statements compared to the video intervention.

Conclusions

The study highlights the importance of supervised hands-on practice in enhancing the acceptability and willingness of chiropractors and chiropractic students to adopt a force-sensing system in their clinical practice.
两种干预措施对测量捏脊力-时间特征的感应手套的可接受性和可用性的影响:一项交叉研究
目的本研究的目的是评估按摩师和按摩学生对测量脊椎推拿疗法(SMT)力-时间特征的感应手套系统的可接受性,并比较两种干预措施在提高其可接受性和感知可用性方面的有效性。方法招募了16名参与者,并对他们对传感手套系统可接受性的12个陈述的同意程度进行了初步评估。然后,他们随机接受了两项干预,以提高他们对该系统的接受程度:一项是7分钟的信息视频,另一项是20分钟的监督练习。在每次干预后,参与者重新评估他们对可接受性陈述的同意,并通过10个额外的陈述提供关于系统可用性的反馈。数据分析使用McNemar和Cochran的Q测试来评估干预措施的有效性。结果与基线相比,练习阶段的参与者多同意4个可接受性陈述,比视频干预后多同意1个可接受性陈述。相反,与基线相比,视频干预显示只有一个陈述的同意比例增加。此外,与视频干预相比,练习环节导致更高比例的参与者同意2个可用性陈述。结论本研究强调了督导下的动手实践在提高脊医和脊医学生在临床实践中采用力感系统的接受度和意愿方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书