Trendelenburg Test as a Predictor of Pelvic Drop Associated With Hip Abductor Function in Young, Healthy Adults During Gait

Journal of chiropractic medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.021
Alexander J. Andrews BHlth & BiomedSc (Hons) , Phoebe C. Henry BHlth & BiomedSc (Hons) , Luke McCarney BHlth & BiomedSc (Hons) , Amanda J. Kimpton PhD , Dein Vindigni PhD , Noel Lythgo PhD
{"title":"Trendelenburg Test as a Predictor of Pelvic Drop Associated With Hip Abductor Function in Young, Healthy Adults During Gait","authors":"Alexander J. Andrews BHlth & BiomedSc (Hons) ,&nbsp;Phoebe C. Henry BHlth & BiomedSc (Hons) ,&nbsp;Luke McCarney BHlth & BiomedSc (Hons) ,&nbsp;Amanda J. Kimpton PhD ,&nbsp;Dein Vindigni PhD ,&nbsp;Noel Lythgo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explored the link between hip abductor function, assessed through the Trendelenburg test (TT), and pelvic drop during walking and running across various terrains and speeds.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 19 healthy adults (11 females, 8 males; average age 24.4 years, height 1.74 meters, weight 72.5 kilograms) participated. The TT was conducted on both sides of each participant’s body, followed by walking at three speeds (self-selected, slow, fast) on 3 slopes (–10%, level, 10%) and running at 2 speeds (8 and 10 km/h) on the same slopes, using a motorized treadmill. Pelvic motion was captured with a 3D system to analyze maximum and minimum pelvic motion (<em>P</em><sub>MAX</sub>, <em>P</em><sub>MIN</sub>) and range of angular motion (<em>P</em><sub>ROM</sub>). Participants were divided into “positive” and “negative” groups based on TT results. Independent and paired <em>t</em> tests (with Bonferroni corrections), along with Pearson’s correlations, were used to analyze data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences in <em>P</em><sub>MAX</sub> and <em>P</em><sub>MIN</sub> were observed between the groups, with the “positive” group showing 5.3° and 5.9° less movement, respectively, than the “negative” group. However, no significant differences were found in <em>P</em><sub>ROM</sub> data between the groups across all gait tasks, and no correlation was identified between TT <em>P</em><sub>ROM</sub> data and <em>P</em><sub>ROM</sub> gait data in different walking conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study showed no association between the effects of hip abductor weakness (as identified by the TT) and pelvic mobility during walking and running gait in a healthy, young population. While the TT may serve as a valuable tool for identifying hip abductor weakness in a clinical setting, its direct applicability to predicting dynamic pelvic motion during walking and running remains limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370725000446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explored the link between hip abductor function, assessed through the Trendelenburg test (TT), and pelvic drop during walking and running across various terrains and speeds.

Methods

A sample of 19 healthy adults (11 females, 8 males; average age 24.4 years, height 1.74 meters, weight 72.5 kilograms) participated. The TT was conducted on both sides of each participant’s body, followed by walking at three speeds (self-selected, slow, fast) on 3 slopes (–10%, level, 10%) and running at 2 speeds (8 and 10 km/h) on the same slopes, using a motorized treadmill. Pelvic motion was captured with a 3D system to analyze maximum and minimum pelvic motion (PMAX, PMIN) and range of angular motion (PROM). Participants were divided into “positive” and “negative” groups based on TT results. Independent and paired t tests (with Bonferroni corrections), along with Pearson’s correlations, were used to analyze data.

Results

Significant differences in PMAX and PMIN were observed between the groups, with the “positive” group showing 5.3° and 5.9° less movement, respectively, than the “negative” group. However, no significant differences were found in PROM data between the groups across all gait tasks, and no correlation was identified between TT PROM data and PROM gait data in different walking conditions.

Conclusion

This study showed no association between the effects of hip abductor weakness (as identified by the TT) and pelvic mobility during walking and running gait in a healthy, young population. While the TT may serve as a valuable tool for identifying hip abductor weakness in a clinical setting, its direct applicability to predicting dynamic pelvic motion during walking and running remains limited.
Trendelenburg试验作为年轻健康成人步态中骨盆下降与髋关节外展肌功能相关的预测因子
目的本研究通过Trendelenburg试验(TT)评估髋关节外展肌功能与在不同地形和速度下行走和跑步时骨盆下垂之间的关系。方法选取健康成人19例,其中女性11例,男性8例,平均年龄24.4岁,身高1.74 m,体重72.5 kg。在每个参与者的身体两侧进行TT,然后在3个斜坡(-10%,水平,10%)上以3种速度(自行选择,慢速,快速)行走,并在同一斜坡上使用电动跑步机以2种速度(8和10公里/小时)跑步。用3D系统捕获骨盆运动,分析最大和最小骨盆运动(PMAX, PMIN)和角运动范围(PROM)。根据TT结果,参与者被分为“积极”组和“消极”组。独立t检验和配对t检验(Bonferroni修正)以及Pearson相关性被用于分析数据。结果两组间PMAX和PMIN有显著性差异,“阳性”组比“阴性”组分别少运动5.3°和5.9°。然而,在所有步态任务中,各组之间的PROM数据没有显著差异,并且在不同行走条件下,TT PROM数据与PROM步态数据之间没有相关性。结论:本研究显示,在健康的年轻人群中,髋关节外展肌无力(由TT确定)与行走和跑步步态中的骨盆活动度之间没有关联。虽然TT在临床中可以作为识别髋关节外展肌无力的有价值的工具,但它在预测行走和跑步时骨盆动态运动的直接适用性仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书