Adding Manual Therapy to a Respiratory-Rehabilitation Program in Patients with Respiratory Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Meta-Regression

Journal of chiropractic medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.003
Ferran Cuenca-Martínez PhD , Núria Sempere-Rubio PhD , Enrique Carrasco-González MSc , Francisco M. Martínez-Arnau PhD
{"title":"Adding Manual Therapy to a Respiratory-Rehabilitation Program in Patients with Respiratory Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Meta-Regression","authors":"Ferran Cuenca-Martínez PhD ,&nbsp;Núria Sempere-Rubio PhD ,&nbsp;Enrique Carrasco-González MSc ,&nbsp;Francisco M. Martínez-Arnau PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main aim of this study was to assess the effects of adding MT to a Respiratory Rehabilitation (RR) program in patients with Respiratory Disorders (RD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Google Scholar (February 1<sup>st</sup> 2023). The outcome measures were pulmonary function parameters (FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC); and exercise capacity, through the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and were pooled in a meta-analysis with a random effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 6 studies were included. Regarding the pulmonary function parameters, no significant effects were found in favor of adding MT to a RR program. However, the meta-analysis showed a significant improvement of 6-MWT when MT were added to a RR with a small clinical effect (n = 6, SMD = –0.55 (–1.01 to –0.09)). Lastly, the meta-regression analysis revealed that the intervention time of MT was not significantly correlated with the improvement of FEV1 (R2 = 52.49%, <em>P = .</em>16), FVC (R2=4.22%, <em>P = .</em>70), or 6-MWT (R<sup>2</sup>=9.95%, <em>P = .</em>62).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is low-quality evidence that adding MT to an RR program can improve the exercise capacity in patients with RD. However, MT plus RR showed no effect on pulmonary function parameters, also with low-quality evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 361-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370725000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The main aim of this study was to assess the effects of adding MT to a Respiratory Rehabilitation (RR) program in patients with Respiratory Disorders (RD).

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Google Scholar (February 1st 2023). The outcome measures were pulmonary function parameters (FEV1 and FVC); and exercise capacity, through the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and were pooled in a meta-analysis with a random effects model.

Results

In total, 6 studies were included. Regarding the pulmonary function parameters, no significant effects were found in favor of adding MT to a RR program. However, the meta-analysis showed a significant improvement of 6-MWT when MT were added to a RR with a small clinical effect (n = 6, SMD = –0.55 (–1.01 to –0.09)). Lastly, the meta-regression analysis revealed that the intervention time of MT was not significantly correlated with the improvement of FEV1 (R2 = 52.49%, P = .16), FVC (R2=4.22%, P = .70), or 6-MWT (R2=9.95%, P = .62).

Conclusions

There is low-quality evidence that adding MT to an RR program can improve the exercise capacity in patients with RD. However, MT plus RR showed no effect on pulmonary function parameters, also with low-quality evidence.
在呼吸系统疾病患者的呼吸康复计划中加入手工治疗:一项系统回顾和meta -回归分析
目的本研究的主要目的是评估在呼吸系统疾病(RD)患者的呼吸康复(RR)计划中加入MT的效果。方法系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、PEDro和谷歌Scholar(2023年2月1日)的文献。结局指标为肺功能参数(FEV1和FVC);和运动能力,通过6分钟步行测试(6-MWT)。计算标准化平均差异(SMDs)和95%置信区间,并在随机效应模型的荟萃分析中合并。结果共纳入6项研究。关于肺功能参数,没有发现支持将MT加入RR计划的显著影响。然而,meta分析显示,当MT添加到临床效果较小的RR中时,6- mwt显著改善(n = 6, SMD = -0.55(-1.01至-0.09))。最后,meta回归分析显示,MT干预时间与FEV1 (R2= 52.49%, P = 0.16)、FVC (R2=4.22%, P = 0.70)、6-MWT (R2=9.95%, P = 0.62)的改善无显著相关。结论有低质量证据表明,在RR方案中加入MT可以提高RD患者的运动能力。然而,MT加RR对肺功能参数没有影响,证据质量也很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书