Rib Mobilization and Diaphragm Release on Diaphragmatic Mobility and Pulmonary Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Feasibility Clinical Trial

Journal of chiropractic medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.033
Helena Rocha MSc , Rodrigo Souza MSc , Taciano Rocha PhD , Luciana Alcoforado PhD , Daniella Cunha Brandão PhD , Armèle Dornelas de Andrade PhD
{"title":"Rib Mobilization and Diaphragm Release on Diaphragmatic Mobility and Pulmonary Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Feasibility Clinical Trial","authors":"Helena Rocha MSc ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Souza MSc ,&nbsp;Taciano Rocha PhD ,&nbsp;Luciana Alcoforado PhD ,&nbsp;Daniella Cunha Brandão PhD ,&nbsp;Armèle Dornelas de Andrade PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a study to measure the effects of a protocol combining Rib mobilization technique (RMT) and diaphragm release technique (DRT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), investigating its impact on diaphragmatic mobility, pulmonary function, and functional capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A clinical trial including 14 patients divided into 2 groups: RMT+DRT and DRT. Six intervention sessions were conducted, with assessments performed at Pre, Post 1, Post 6, and Follow-up time points. Outcomes included diaphragmatic mobility (ultrasound), thoracoabdominal kinematics (optoelectronic plethysmography), maximal respiratory pressures (manovacuometry), functional capacity (six-minute walk test [6MWT]), and perceived improvement (patients’ global impression of change scale).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The protocol was well tolerated, with strong compliance and no adverse events reported. The RMT+DRT group demonstrated a clinically relevant improvement in diaphragmatic mobility (19.58 mm) and in the 6MWT distance (27.23 m), both exceeding the clinically significant difference thresholds. A relative reduction in maximal expiratory pressure was observed in the RMT+DRT group. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for thoracoabdominal kinematics and maximal inspiratory pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This feasibility study suggests that a study of the combination of rib mobilization and diaphragmatic release is a feasible and well-tolerated intervention for patients with COPD, and may have a positive impact on respiratory mechanics and functional capacity. The findings provide a basis for sample size calculation and protocol refinement in future clinical trials to confirm its therapeutic effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 308-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370725000550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a study to measure the effects of a protocol combining Rib mobilization technique (RMT) and diaphragm release technique (DRT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), investigating its impact on diaphragmatic mobility, pulmonary function, and functional capacity.

Methods

A clinical trial including 14 patients divided into 2 groups: RMT+DRT and DRT. Six intervention sessions were conducted, with assessments performed at Pre, Post 1, Post 6, and Follow-up time points. Outcomes included diaphragmatic mobility (ultrasound), thoracoabdominal kinematics (optoelectronic plethysmography), maximal respiratory pressures (manovacuometry), functional capacity (six-minute walk test [6MWT]), and perceived improvement (patients’ global impression of change scale).

Results

The protocol was well tolerated, with strong compliance and no adverse events reported. The RMT+DRT group demonstrated a clinically relevant improvement in diaphragmatic mobility (19.58 mm) and in the 6MWT distance (27.23 m), both exceeding the clinically significant difference thresholds. A relative reduction in maximal expiratory pressure was observed in the RMT+DRT group. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for thoracoabdominal kinematics and maximal inspiratory pressure.

Conclusion

This feasibility study suggests that a study of the combination of rib mobilization and diaphragmatic release is a feasible and well-tolerated intervention for patients with COPD, and may have a positive impact on respiratory mechanics and functional capacity. The findings provide a basis for sample size calculation and protocol refinement in future clinical trials to confirm its therapeutic effects.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病中肋骨活动和膈肌释放对膈肌活动和肺功能的影响:一项可行性临床试验
目的本研究的目的是评估一项研究的可行性,以衡量一项结合肋骨动员技术(RMT)和膈肌释放技术(DRT)的方案在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的效果,研究其对膈肌活动、肺功能和功能容量的影响。方法14例患者进行临床试验,分为RMT+DRT组和DRT组。进行了六次干预,分别在术前、术后1、术后6和随访时间点进行评估。结果包括膈活动性(超声)、胸腹运动学(光电体积描记术)、最大呼吸压力(压力测量法)、功能能力(6分钟步行试验[6MWT])和感知改善(患者对变化量表的总体印象)。结果该方案耐受性好,依从性强,无不良事件报告。RMT+DRT组膈肌活动度(19.58 mm)和6MWT距离(27.23 m)均有临床相关的改善,均超过临床显著差异阈值。RMT+DRT组最大呼气压相对降低。两组间胸腹运动学和最大吸气压力无统计学差异。结论本可行性研究提示肋骨活动联合膈肌松解是COPD患者一种可行且耐受性良好的干预措施,可能对呼吸力学和功能能力产生积极影响。研究结果为今后临床试验中样本量的计算和方案的完善提供了依据,以确认其治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书