Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Using a Smartphone for the Measurement of the Angle of Trunk Rotation and the Stiffness Scoliosis Test in Adolescents With Scoliosis
{"title":"Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Using a Smartphone for the Measurement of the Angle of Trunk Rotation and the Stiffness Scoliosis Test in Adolescents With Scoliosis","authors":"Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite Navarro PhD, Camila Silva Braga BPT, Cláudia Tarragô Candotti PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) and the stiffness scoliosis test (SST) measured using a smartphone with a simple external device (binder clips) using the scoliometer as the reference standard; and (2) to evaluate the effect of the rater’s experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a diagnostic accuracy study. Each participant was evaluated by 2 raters using a scoliometer and a smartphone (applied using a very simple external device - binder clips). Exclusion criteria: spinal surgery, any diagnosable cause of scoliosis, and upper or lower limb amputation. The sequence of the 2 consecutive procedures of evaluation and the 2 raters were randomly chosen. For statistical purposes, the Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation test, the root mean square (RMS) error, the Bland-Altman graphic analysis and the ROC curve analysis were conducted (<em>P</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample consisted of 50 gibbosities of 38 participants, where 74% (n = 28) were girls and 26% (n = 10) boys, with a mean age of 13.4 ± 2.5 years. The correlations were excellent, ranging from 0.77 to 0.91 for ATR and SST, with RMS error of 2° to 5°. There was agreement between the measurements with a mean difference of 0.04° to 1.24°. The ROC curve presented an area under the curve of 95%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The smartphone, when used with a simple external device (binder clips), is valid and accurate for ATR and SST measurement. Evaluator experience has no effect on the results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 226-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370725000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) and the stiffness scoliosis test (SST) measured using a smartphone with a simple external device (binder clips) using the scoliometer as the reference standard; and (2) to evaluate the effect of the rater’s experience.
Methods
This was a diagnostic accuracy study. Each participant was evaluated by 2 raters using a scoliometer and a smartphone (applied using a very simple external device - binder clips). Exclusion criteria: spinal surgery, any diagnosable cause of scoliosis, and upper or lower limb amputation. The sequence of the 2 consecutive procedures of evaluation and the 2 raters were randomly chosen. For statistical purposes, the Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation test, the root mean square (RMS) error, the Bland-Altman graphic analysis and the ROC curve analysis were conducted (P < .05).
Results
The sample consisted of 50 gibbosities of 38 participants, where 74% (n = 28) were girls and 26% (n = 10) boys, with a mean age of 13.4 ± 2.5 years. The correlations were excellent, ranging from 0.77 to 0.91 for ATR and SST, with RMS error of 2° to 5°. There was agreement between the measurements with a mean difference of 0.04° to 1.24°. The ROC curve presented an area under the curve of 95%.
Conclusion
The smartphone, when used with a simple external device (binder clips), is valid and accurate for ATR and SST measurement. Evaluator experience has no effect on the results.