Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Using a Smartphone for the Measurement of the Angle of Trunk Rotation and the Stiffness Scoliosis Test in Adolescents With Scoliosis

Journal of chiropractic medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.022
Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite Navarro PhD, Camila Silva Braga BPT, Cláudia Tarragô Candotti PhD
{"title":"Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Using a Smartphone for the Measurement of the Angle of Trunk Rotation and the Stiffness Scoliosis Test in Adolescents With Scoliosis","authors":"Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite Navarro PhD,&nbsp;Camila Silva Braga BPT,&nbsp;Cláudia Tarragô Candotti PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2025.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) and the stiffness scoliosis test (SST) measured using a smartphone with a simple external device (binder clips) using the scoliometer as the reference standard; and (2) to evaluate the effect of the rater’s experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a diagnostic accuracy study. Each participant was evaluated by 2 raters using a scoliometer and a smartphone (applied using a very simple external device - binder clips). Exclusion criteria: spinal surgery, any diagnosable cause of scoliosis, and upper or lower limb amputation. The sequence of the 2 consecutive procedures of evaluation and the 2 raters were randomly chosen. For statistical purposes, the Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation test, the root mean square (RMS) error, the Bland-Altman graphic analysis and the ROC curve analysis were conducted (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample consisted of 50 gibbosities of 38 participants, where 74% (n = 28) were girls and 26% (n = 10) boys, with a mean age of 13.4 ± 2.5 years. The correlations were excellent, ranging from 0.77 to 0.91 for ATR and SST, with RMS error of 2° to 5°. There was agreement between the measurements with a mean difference of 0.04° to 1.24°. The ROC curve presented an area under the curve of 95%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The smartphone, when used with a simple external device (binder clips), is valid and accurate for ATR and SST measurement. Evaluator experience has no effect on the results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 226-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370725000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) and the stiffness scoliosis test (SST) measured using a smartphone with a simple external device (binder clips) using the scoliometer as the reference standard; and (2) to evaluate the effect of the rater’s experience.

Methods

This was a diagnostic accuracy study. Each participant was evaluated by 2 raters using a scoliometer and a smartphone (applied using a very simple external device - binder clips). Exclusion criteria: spinal surgery, any diagnosable cause of scoliosis, and upper or lower limb amputation. The sequence of the 2 consecutive procedures of evaluation and the 2 raters were randomly chosen. For statistical purposes, the Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation test, the root mean square (RMS) error, the Bland-Altman graphic analysis and the ROC curve analysis were conducted (P < .05).

Results

The sample consisted of 50 gibbosities of 38 participants, where 74% (n = 28) were girls and 26% (n = 10) boys, with a mean age of 13.4 ± 2.5 years. The correlations were excellent, ranging from 0.77 to 0.91 for ATR and SST, with RMS error of 2° to 5°. There was agreement between the measurements with a mean difference of 0.04° to 1.24°. The ROC curve presented an area under the curve of 95%.

Conclusion

The smartphone, when used with a simple external device (binder clips), is valid and accurate for ATR and SST measurement. Evaluator experience has no effect on the results.
使用智能手机测量躯干旋转角度和刚度脊柱侧凸试验在青少年脊柱侧凸中的有效性和诊断准确性
目的探讨以脊柱侧弯计为参考标准,在智能手机上使用简易外接装置(活页夹)测量躯干旋转角(ATR)和脊柱侧凸刚度试验(SST)的有效性和诊断准确性;(2)评价评价者体验的效果。方法诊断准确性研究。每位参与者由2名评分员使用脊柱侧弯计和智能手机(使用非常简单的外部设备-活页夹)进行评估。排除标准:脊柱手术,任何可诊断的脊柱侧凸原因,以及上肢或下肢截肢。随机选择连续2个评价程序的顺序和2名评价者。统计学上采用Spearman’s和Pearson’s相关检验、均方根误差、Bland-Altman图形分析和ROC曲线分析(P < 0.05)。结果本组共38例患者50例,其中女孩28例,占74%,男孩10例,占26%,平均年龄13.4±2.5岁。ATR和SST的相关性非常好,范围为0.77 ~ 0.91,均方根误差为2°~ 5°。测量结果一致,平均差为0.04°至1.24°。ROC曲线下面积为95%。结论智能手机与简单的外接装置(活页夹)配合使用,可有效、准确地测量ATR和SST。评估员的经验对结果没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书