Martin Lehnert , Christian Liebchen , Martin Schiefelbusch , Peter Bruder , Dennis Harmann
{"title":"Insights into Ridepooling efficiency: A case study analysis using a novel operational performance measure framework","authors":"Martin Lehnert , Christian Liebchen , Martin Schiefelbusch , Peter Bruder , Dennis Harmann","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficiency of demand responsive transport (DRT) services, such as ridepooling, has garnered significant attention across various (simulation) studies. However, a deeper look into the metrics employed to assess system performance exposes notable discrepancies in their utilization. Notably, certain indicators, such as the pooling rate, demonstrate a susceptibility to manipulation based on input parameters, potentially skewing results to give a more favorable impression of service performance. In this paper, we show that, under such circumstances, achieving a fair comparison between study outcomes and with traditional (public) transport modes becomes challenging.</div><div>In light of these challenges, this study introduces a novel operational performance indicator: Operational System Efficiency (<em>OSE</em>). <em>OSE</em> is tailored to evaluate the operational efficiency of ridepooling systems in a holistic way. In particular, it combines important operational indicators such as detour factor and empty kilometers share, which are considered in numerous analyses. Hereby, <em>OSE</em> is fostering a more equitable assessment of service performance. We applied this methodology and calculated the indicators provided in other studies to two real-world trip datasets from ridepooling services in Berlin and Münster, Germany, and compared the results. Distinct disparities emerge in comparison with conventional efficiency indicators. Consequently, the proposed <em>OSE</em> holds promise for stakeholders, including service providers, public transport companies, and regulatory authorities, as a valuable tool for determining the suitability of a ridepooling service for a given locale relative to other transport modalities, while also providing a transparent assessment of its efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100173"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficiency of demand responsive transport (DRT) services, such as ridepooling, has garnered significant attention across various (simulation) studies. However, a deeper look into the metrics employed to assess system performance exposes notable discrepancies in their utilization. Notably, certain indicators, such as the pooling rate, demonstrate a susceptibility to manipulation based on input parameters, potentially skewing results to give a more favorable impression of service performance. In this paper, we show that, under such circumstances, achieving a fair comparison between study outcomes and with traditional (public) transport modes becomes challenging.
In light of these challenges, this study introduces a novel operational performance indicator: Operational System Efficiency (OSE). OSE is tailored to evaluate the operational efficiency of ridepooling systems in a holistic way. In particular, it combines important operational indicators such as detour factor and empty kilometers share, which are considered in numerous analyses. Hereby, OSE is fostering a more equitable assessment of service performance. We applied this methodology and calculated the indicators provided in other studies to two real-world trip datasets from ridepooling services in Berlin and Münster, Germany, and compared the results. Distinct disparities emerge in comparison with conventional efficiency indicators. Consequently, the proposed OSE holds promise for stakeholders, including service providers, public transport companies, and regulatory authorities, as a valuable tool for determining the suitability of a ridepooling service for a given locale relative to other transport modalities, while also providing a transparent assessment of its efficiency.
需求响应交通(DRT)服务的效率,如拼车,在各种(模拟)研究中引起了极大的关注。然而,更深入地研究用于评估系统性能的度量,就会发现它们的利用率存在显著差异。值得注意的是,某些指标,如池化率,显示出对基于输入参数的操纵的敏感性,可能会扭曲结果,从而给服务性能提供更有利的印象。在本文中,我们表明,在这种情况下,实现研究结果与传统(公共)交通方式之间的公平比较变得具有挑战性。鉴于这些挑战,本研究引入了一种新的运营绩效指标:运营系统效率(operational System Efficiency, OSE)。OSE旨在全面评估拼车系统的运营效率。特别是,它结合了重要的业务指标,如绕行系数和空公里份额,这是在许多分析中考虑的。因此,OSE正在促进对服务绩效的更公平的评估。我们将这一方法应用于其他研究中提供的指标,并将其计算到两个来自德国柏林和梅 nster的拼车服务的真实旅行数据集,并对结果进行比较。与传统效率指标相比,出现了明显的差距。因此,拟议的OSE为包括服务提供商、公共交通公司和监管机构在内的利益相关者带来了希望,作为一种有价值的工具,可以确定拼车服务相对于其他交通方式在特定地区的适用性,同时还提供了对其效率的透明评估。