Critical care nurses are interested in participating in research but more needs to be done to prepare them: a systematic review

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2025.152031
JoAnne McIntyre , Anne Mette Adams , Xia Jin , Frances Lin
{"title":"Critical care nurses are interested in participating in research but more needs to be done to prepare them: a systematic review","authors":"JoAnne McIntyre ,&nbsp;Anne Mette Adams ,&nbsp;Xia Jin ,&nbsp;Frances Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2025.152031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical research is vital in critical care settings to support evidence-based care for critically ill patients. However, critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with research remain underexplored. Given that nurses' attitudes may influence the quality and rigour of research, understanding these perspectives is essential.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To review the literature describing critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with clinical research conducted in critical care units.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This is a narrative systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Seven databases were searched. Studies were restricted to full text in English between January 2000 and March 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018. Results were synthesised narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1038 records, 11 studies met inclusion criteria, covering 31 adult ICUs (<em>n</em> = 1075) and 19 paediatric/neonatal ICUs (<em>n</em> = 1428). Methodological quality varied; only three studies met all criteria, with common limitations in measurement tools and sample representativeness. Five key themes emerged: (1) positive attitudes to research, (2) inconsistent research involvement, (3) variable research education and capability, (4) insufficient research communication and dissemination, and (5) barriers and facilitators to research engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Critical care nurses valued clinical research, but engagement was limited by workload, research education, communication challenges, and institutional constraints. While many critical care nurses cared for patients enrolled in trials, fewer were involved in study design or dissemination.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42024541761.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 152031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189725001338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical research is vital in critical care settings to support evidence-based care for critically ill patients. However, critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with research remain underexplored. Given that nurses' attitudes may influence the quality and rigour of research, understanding these perspectives is essential.

Aim

To review the literature describing critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with clinical research conducted in critical care units.

Design

This is a narrative systematic review.

Methods

This mixed-methods systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Seven databases were searched. Studies were restricted to full text in English between January 2000 and March 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018. Results were synthesised narratively.

Results

Of 1038 records, 11 studies met inclusion criteria, covering 31 adult ICUs (n = 1075) and 19 paediatric/neonatal ICUs (n = 1428). Methodological quality varied; only three studies met all criteria, with common limitations in measurement tools and sample representativeness. Five key themes emerged: (1) positive attitudes to research, (2) inconsistent research involvement, (3) variable research education and capability, (4) insufficient research communication and dissemination, and (5) barriers and facilitators to research engagement.

Conclusions

Critical care nurses valued clinical research, but engagement was limited by workload, research education, communication challenges, and institutional constraints. While many critical care nurses cared for patients enrolled in trials, fewer were involved in study design or dissemination.

Registration

PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42024541761.
重症护理护士对参与研究很感兴趣,但需要做更多的准备工作:系统的审查
临床研究对于支持危重患者的循证护理至关重要。然而,重症护理护士的知识、态度和研究经验仍未得到充分探索。鉴于护士的态度可能影响研究的质量和严谨性,了解这些观点是至关重要的。目的回顾描述重症监护护士在重症监护病房进行临床研究的知识、态度和经验的文献。这是一篇叙述性的系统综述。方法采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法,采用混合方法进行系统评价。检索了7个数据库。2000年1月至2025年3月期间的研究仅限于英文全文。使用2018年版混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。对结果进行叙述性综合。结果1038项记录中,11项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖31例成人icu (n = 1075)和19例儿科/新生儿icu (n = 1428)。方法质量参差不齐;只有三个研究符合所有标准,在测量工具和样本代表性方面存在共同的局限性。出现了五个关键主题:(1)积极的研究态度;(2)不一致的研究参与;(3)可变的研究教育和能力;(4)研究沟通和传播不足;(5)研究参与的障碍和促进因素。结论重症护理护士重视临床研究,但受工作量、研究教育、沟通挑战和制度限制,临床研究参与度有限。虽然许多重症护理护士照顾参加试验的病人,但很少有人参与研究设计或传播。普洛斯普洛斯普洛斯注册号CRD42024541761。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书