Integrating the SDGs into SMEs: A systematic review of approaches, barriers, and assessment methods

IF 5
Cleaner Production Letters Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100119
Hoang Thien Le , Giulio Pappa , Nicola Lattanzi
{"title":"Integrating the SDGs into SMEs: A systematic review of approaches, barriers, and assessment methods","authors":"Hoang Thien Le ,&nbsp;Giulio Pappa ,&nbsp;Nicola Lattanzi","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are crucial to national economies but face unique challenges in aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Prior research remains fragmented and largely descriptive, offering limited integration across implementation approaches, barriers, and assessment methods. To bridge the gap, this review offers an integrated synthesis of how SMEs engage with the SDGs, the obstacles they encounter, and how sustainability performance is evaluated. A systematic literature review was carried out under PRISMA guidelines, combining bibliometric mapping and qualitative content analysis of 95 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2024. Eight major approaches were identified—dominated by <em>innovation-technology adoption</em>, <em>cross-sector collaboration</em>, and <em>stakeholder engagement</em>—while four main barrier categories also synthesized, led by <em>internal and institutional constraints</em>. Furthermore, sustainability performance is most often assessed through the Triple Bottom Line and Key Performance Indicator frameworks, with growing applications of Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental-Social-Governance, and Life Cycle Assessment methods. Building on these findings, this study proposed the Approach–Barrier–Assessment–Fit framework, which aligns strategies, barriers, and assessment choices under contextual fit. The framework contributes to theoretical understanding of SME sustainability transitions and provides practical insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers supporting SDG implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791625000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are crucial to national economies but face unique challenges in aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Prior research remains fragmented and largely descriptive, offering limited integration across implementation approaches, barriers, and assessment methods. To bridge the gap, this review offers an integrated synthesis of how SMEs engage with the SDGs, the obstacles they encounter, and how sustainability performance is evaluated. A systematic literature review was carried out under PRISMA guidelines, combining bibliometric mapping and qualitative content analysis of 95 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2024. Eight major approaches were identified—dominated by innovation-technology adoption, cross-sector collaboration, and stakeholder engagement—while four main barrier categories also synthesized, led by internal and institutional constraints. Furthermore, sustainability performance is most often assessed through the Triple Bottom Line and Key Performance Indicator frameworks, with growing applications of Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental-Social-Governance, and Life Cycle Assessment methods. Building on these findings, this study proposed the Approach–Barrier–Assessment–Fit framework, which aligns strategies, barriers, and assessment choices under contextual fit. The framework contributes to theoretical understanding of SME sustainability transitions and provides practical insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers supporting SDG implementation.

Abstract Image

将可持续发展目标纳入中小企业:对途径、障碍和评估方法的系统审查
中小企业对国民经济至关重要,但在实现联合国可持续发展目标方面面临着独特的挑战。先前的研究仍然是碎片化的,主要是描述性的,提供了有限的跨实施方法、障碍和评估方法的整合。为了弥补这一差距,本综述对中小企业如何参与可持续发展目标、他们遇到的障碍以及如何评估可持续发展绩效进行了综合分析。在PRISMA的指导下,对2015 - 2024年间发表的95篇同行评议文章进行了系统的文献综述,结合文献计量学制图和定性内容分析。确定了八种主要方法——以创新技术采用、跨部门合作和利益相关者参与为主导——同时还综合了四种主要障碍类别,由内部和制度约束主导。此外,随着企业社会责任、环境-社会治理和生命周期评估方法的应用越来越多,可持续发展绩效最常通过三重底线和关键绩效指标框架进行评估。在这些发现的基础上,本研究提出了方法-障碍-评估-匹配框架,该框架将战略、障碍和评估选择在上下文匹配下进行对齐。该框架有助于对中小企业可持续转型的理论理解,并为支持可持续发展目标实施的研究人员、从业者和政策制定者提供实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书