Who rides the feeder? A multi-group SEM analysis of commuters’ intention to use paratransit as a feeder to a dedicated bus lane public transportation system

Q1 Engineering
Transportation Engineering Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.treng.2025.100410
Simeon Stevenson Turay , Charles Anum Adams , Augustus Ababio-Donkor , R. Sivanandan , Karthik K. Srinivasan
{"title":"Who rides the feeder? A multi-group SEM analysis of commuters’ intention to use paratransit as a feeder to a dedicated bus lane public transportation system","authors":"Simeon Stevenson Turay ,&nbsp;Charles Anum Adams ,&nbsp;Augustus Ababio-Donkor ,&nbsp;R. Sivanandan ,&nbsp;Karthik K. Srinivasan","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2025.100410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In most Sub-Saharan African cities, promoting an integrated public transportation system often requires complementary feeder services. In Greater Freetown, Sierra Leone, proposals for the city’s first dedicated bus lane public transportation (DBLPT) system with high-quality buses are expected to transform existing service operations. A critical question is whether commuters will be willing to use paratransit services as a feeder to this new system. To explore this, the current study employs a multi-group structural equation modelling approach to investigate the factors influencing commuter intentions to adopt paratransit feeder services, thereby offering insights into service quality needs, potential behavioural shifts and system integration. The intention to use was tested for invariance across gender, age, and income groups. Data on the operations, service quality improvement, and commuters' intention to use the service were collected through a combination of onboard vehicle traffic and questionnaire surveys. Findings revealed that system accessibility and comfort positively influenced the intention to use paratransit feeder services. Gender and age differences were evident: males expressed stronger intentions to use an integrated feeder system, while females placed greater emphasis on comfort and convenience. Mid-aged adults were more sensitive to shorter commute distances, safety, intermodal connections, fare integration, and service accessibility. No significant differences were found across income groups for any of the measured attributes. Modal preference patterns indicated that minibuses were favoured by males and younger adults, whereas three-wheelers were preferred by females and mid-aged adults. These insights provide baseline evidence for planning and implementing integrated feeder services in developing cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X25001095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most Sub-Saharan African cities, promoting an integrated public transportation system often requires complementary feeder services. In Greater Freetown, Sierra Leone, proposals for the city’s first dedicated bus lane public transportation (DBLPT) system with high-quality buses are expected to transform existing service operations. A critical question is whether commuters will be willing to use paratransit services as a feeder to this new system. To explore this, the current study employs a multi-group structural equation modelling approach to investigate the factors influencing commuter intentions to adopt paratransit feeder services, thereby offering insights into service quality needs, potential behavioural shifts and system integration. The intention to use was tested for invariance across gender, age, and income groups. Data on the operations, service quality improvement, and commuters' intention to use the service were collected through a combination of onboard vehicle traffic and questionnaire surveys. Findings revealed that system accessibility and comfort positively influenced the intention to use paratransit feeder services. Gender and age differences were evident: males expressed stronger intentions to use an integrated feeder system, while females placed greater emphasis on comfort and convenience. Mid-aged adults were more sensitive to shorter commute distances, safety, intermodal connections, fare integration, and service accessibility. No significant differences were found across income groups for any of the measured attributes. Modal preference patterns indicated that minibuses were favoured by males and younger adults, whereas three-wheelers were preferred by females and mid-aged adults. These insights provide baseline evidence for planning and implementing integrated feeder services in developing cities.
谁骑喂食器?通勤者使用辅助交通作为专用公交车道公共交通系统的接驳站的意向的多组SEM分析
在大多数撒哈拉以南非洲城市,促进综合公共交通系统往往需要补充支线服务。在塞拉利昂的大弗里敦(Greater Freetown),该市首个配备高质量公交车的专用公交车道公共交通(DBLPT)系统的提议有望改变现有的服务运营。一个关键的问题是,通勤者是否愿意使用辅助交通服务作为这个新系统的支线。为此,本研究采用多组结构方程建模方法,探讨影响通勤者采用支线服务意愿的因素,从而深入了解服务质量需求、潜在行为转变和系统整合。对使用意向进行了跨性别、年龄和收入群体的不变性测试。我们透过车载交通及问卷调查,收集有关营运、服务质素改善及乘客使用服务意愿的数据。研究结果显示,系统可达性和舒适度对辅助公交接驳服务的使用意愿有正向影响。性别和年龄差异很明显:男性更倾向于使用综合喂养系统,而女性更强调舒适和方便。中年人对较短的通勤距离、安全性、多式联运连接、票价整合和服务可及性更为敏感。在不同的收入群体中,没有发现任何测量属性的显著差异。男性和年轻人偏好小巴,而女性和中年人偏好三轮车。这些见解为发展中城市规划和实施综合支线服务提供了基础证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书