National patterns of brachytherapy boost use for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: Bridging the gap between evidence and practice

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2025.10.008
Alicia C. Smart , Yetkin Tuac , Zhiyu Qian , Grgur Mirić , Peter F. Orio , Martin T. King , Mutlay Sayan
{"title":"National patterns of brachytherapy boost use for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: Bridging the gap between evidence and practice","authors":"Alicia C. Smart ,&nbsp;Yetkin Tuac ,&nbsp;Zhiyu Qian ,&nbsp;Grgur Mirić ,&nbsp;Peter F. Orio ,&nbsp;Martin T. King ,&nbsp;Mutlay Sayan","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Brachytherapy boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT-BT) improves biochemical progression-free survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. However, its adoption in routine clinical practice remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate national trends and factors associated with the use of EBRT-BT following the publication of the ASCENDE-RT trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2015 to 2020. We included men with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer who received EBRT with or without brachytherapy boost as their sole initial treatment. The primary outcome was receipt of brachytherapy boost. Trends in use were assessed by year of diagnosis, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with EBRT-BT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 507,327 men with prostate cancer, 48,777 (9.6%) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 6775 (13.9%) received EBRT-BT. Use increased modestly from 12.4% in 2015 to 14.6% in 2020 among patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, and from 12.5% to 15.2% in those with high-risk disease. In multivariable analysis, use of EBRT-BT was significantly associated with younger age, higher Gleason grade group, and advanced T stage (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Compared with 2015, EBRT-BT use was more likely in 2018–2020 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite level 1 evidence and guideline support, brachytherapy boost remains underutilized. These findings highlight a persistent gap between evidence and practice and underscore the need for strategies to expand access to EBRT-BT and promote its use where clinically appropriate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 300-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472125003514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Brachytherapy boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT-BT) improves biochemical progression-free survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. However, its adoption in routine clinical practice remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate national trends and factors associated with the use of EBRT-BT following the publication of the ASCENDE-RT trial.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2015 to 2020. We included men with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer who received EBRT with or without brachytherapy boost as their sole initial treatment. The primary outcome was receipt of brachytherapy boost. Trends in use were assessed by year of diagnosis, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with EBRT-BT.

Results

Among 507,327 men with prostate cancer, 48,777 (9.6%) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 6775 (13.9%) received EBRT-BT. Use increased modestly from 12.4% in 2015 to 14.6% in 2020 among patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, and from 12.5% to 15.2% in those with high-risk disease. In multivariable analysis, use of EBRT-BT was significantly associated with younger age, higher Gleason grade group, and advanced T stage (all p < 0.001). Compared with 2015, EBRT-BT use was more likely in 2018–2020 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Despite level 1 evidence and guideline support, brachytherapy boost remains underutilized. These findings highlight a persistent gap between evidence and practice and underscore the need for strategies to expand access to EBRT-BT and promote its use where clinically appropriate.
近距离治疗的国家模式促进了中高风险前列腺癌的使用:弥合证据与实践之间的差距。
背景:近距离放疗联合外束放射治疗(EBRT-BT)可改善中高危前列腺癌患者的生化无进展生存期。然而,其在常规临床实践中的应用仍不确定。我们的目的是评估在ASCENDE-RT试验发表后,与使用EBRT-BT相关的国家趋势和因素。方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了2015年至2020年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的数据。我们纳入了接受EBRT加或不加近距离强化治疗作为唯一初始治疗的中度或高风险局限性前列腺癌患者。主要结果是接受近距离治疗。按诊断年份评估使用趋势,并使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与EBRT-BT相关的临床和人口因素。结果:507327例前列腺癌患者中,48777例(9.6%)符合纳入标准。其中,6775例(13.9%)接受了EBRT-BT治疗。在不利的中危疾病患者中,使用率从2015年的12.4%小幅上升至2020年的14.6%,在高危疾病患者中,使用率从12.5%小幅上升至15.2%。在多变量分析中,EBRT-BT的使用与更年轻的年龄、更高的Gleason分级组和晚期T期显著相关(均为p)。结论:尽管有一级证据和指南支持,近距离治疗的促进作用仍未得到充分利用。这些发现突出了证据与实践之间的持续差距,并强调需要制定战略,扩大EBRT-BT的可及性,并在临床上适当的情况下促进其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy 医学-核医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
9.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书