Face-To-Face Versus Virtual Student Events: Creating a Framework for Maximizing Student Event Engagement in Allied Health Programs.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess student perceptions of face-to-face (F2F) versus virtual student events. A secondary goal of this study was to engage students in a deeper dialogue to provide insight into ways to improve the student learning experience for both modalities. The researchers conducted a mixed methods study to investigate student perceptions following F2F and virtual University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center School of Health Professions student events. Utilizing a Likert survey, as well as voluntary focus groups, researchers examined how students experienced student events with the intention of establishing best practices for increasing engagement in future student events. The major themes uncovered in the research indicated that students prefer the F2F format and the benefits of working with someone in-person. The virtual event highlights included interactive games, breakout groups and convenience of the event while the F2F bene¬fits included the free food, human interaction, and the increased student participation.