Human at the Center: A Framework for Human-Driven AI Development

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ai Magazine Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1002/aaai.70043
Danniell Hu, Diana Acosta Navas, Susanne Gaube, Hussein Mozannar, Matthew E. Taylor, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Elizabeth Bondi-Kelly
{"title":"Human at the Center: A Framework for Human-Driven AI Development","authors":"Danniell Hu,&nbsp;Diana Acosta Navas,&nbsp;Susanne Gaube,&nbsp;Hussein Mozannar,&nbsp;Matthew E. Taylor,&nbsp;Krishnamurthy Dvijotham,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bondi-Kelly","doi":"10.1002/aaai.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly shape many aspects of daily life, influencing our jobs, finances, healthcare, and online content. This expansion has led to the rise of human–AI systems, where humans communicate, collaborate, or otherwise interact with AI, such as using AI outputs to make decisions. While these systems have shown potential to enhance human capabilities and improve performance on benchmarks, evidence suggests that they often underperform compared to AI-only or human-only approaches in experiments and real-world applications. Here, we argue that human–AI systems should be developed with a greater emphasis on human-centered factors—such as usability, fairness, trust, and user autonomy—within the algorithmic design and evaluation process. We advocate for integrating human-centered principles into AI development through human-centered algorithmic design and contextual evaluation with real users. Drawing on interdisciplinary research and our tutorial at two major AI conferences, we highlight examples and strategies for AI researchers and practitioners to embed these principles effectively. This work offers a systematic synthesis that integrates technical, practical, and ethical insights into a unified framework. Additionally, we highlight critical ethical considerations, including fairness, labor, privacy, and human agency to ensure that systems meet performance goals while serving broader societal interests. Through this work, we aim to inspire the field to embrace a truly human-centered approach to algorithmic design and deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly shape many aspects of daily life, influencing our jobs, finances, healthcare, and online content. This expansion has led to the rise of human–AI systems, where humans communicate, collaborate, or otherwise interact with AI, such as using AI outputs to make decisions. While these systems have shown potential to enhance human capabilities and improve performance on benchmarks, evidence suggests that they often underperform compared to AI-only or human-only approaches in experiments and real-world applications. Here, we argue that human–AI systems should be developed with a greater emphasis on human-centered factors—such as usability, fairness, trust, and user autonomy—within the algorithmic design and evaluation process. We advocate for integrating human-centered principles into AI development through human-centered algorithmic design and contextual evaluation with real users. Drawing on interdisciplinary research and our tutorial at two major AI conferences, we highlight examples and strategies for AI researchers and practitioners to embed these principles effectively. This work offers a systematic synthesis that integrates technical, practical, and ethical insights into a unified framework. Additionally, we highlight critical ethical considerations, including fairness, labor, privacy, and human agency to ensure that systems meet performance goals while serving broader societal interests. Through this work, we aim to inspire the field to embrace a truly human-centered approach to algorithmic design and deployment.

Abstract Image

以人为中心:人类驱动的人工智能发展框架
人工智能(AI)系统越来越多地影响着日常生活的方方面面,影响着我们的工作、财务、医疗保健和在线内容。这种扩张导致了人类-人工智能系统的兴起,在这种系统中,人类与人工智能进行交流、协作或以其他方式互动,例如使用人工智能的输出来做出决策。虽然这些系统已经显示出增强人类能力和提高基准性能的潜力,但有证据表明,在实验和实际应用中,与纯人工智能或纯人类方法相比,它们的表现往往不佳。在这里,我们认为人类-人工智能系统应该在算法设计和评估过程中更加强调以人为中心的因素,如可用性、公平性、信任和用户自主性。我们倡导通过以人为本的算法设计和真实用户的情境评估,将以人为本的原则融入人工智能开发。通过跨学科研究和我们在两个主要人工智能会议上的指导,我们为人工智能研究人员和从业者提供了有效嵌入这些原则的例子和策略。这项工作提供了一个系统的综合,将技术,实践和伦理见解集成到一个统一的框架中。此外,我们还强调了关键的道德考虑因素,包括公平、劳动、隐私和人类代理,以确保系统在满足性能目标的同时服务于更广泛的社会利益。通过这项工作,我们的目标是激励该领域采用真正以人为中心的算法设计和部署方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ai Magazine
Ai Magazine 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书