Preoperative 3-dimensional planning optimizes glenoid retroversion correction in shoulder arthroplasty using hemi-wedged augmented baseplates

Q4 Medicine
Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2025.05.002
Luis Navas MD , Sebastian Schmidt MD , Carolina Vogel MD , Thorsten Guehring MD, PhD
{"title":"Preoperative 3-dimensional planning optimizes glenoid retroversion correction in shoulder arthroplasty using hemi-wedged augmented baseplates","authors":"Luis Navas MD ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schmidt MD ,&nbsp;Carolina Vogel MD ,&nbsp;Thorsten Guehring MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glenoid version and inclination can be corrected with an augmented baseplate during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) procedures. To achieve an optimal correction of both glenoid version and inclination, this study investigated whether the preoperative use of a 3-dimensional planning system improved the correction of glenoid anatomy in terms of glenoid version (0°) and inclination (rTSA 0°).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We measured preoperative and postoperative glenoid version and inclination by rTSA angle by x-ray and computed tomography scans in 50 prospective cases of rTSA with wedged baseplates. All patients underwent an rTSA due to osteoarthritis and rotator cuff insufficiency. All 50 patients underwent rTSA with the use of a hemi-wedge to correct the glenoid morphology. Twenty five patients additionally underwent a preoperative planning with the Signature ONE Planner to determine the exact rotational position of the hemi-wedge. rTSA angle was determined in preoperative and postoperative x-rays, and glenoid version was determined in preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans at 3 different glenoid levels. The Signature ONE Planner system determined the rotation, position, and size of the hemi-wedge (10°, 20°, or 30°). A control group of 25 patients underwent hemi-wedge rTSA without preoperative planning. The position of the sphere and the sphere bone overhang distance (mm) was determined in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all 50 patients, the inclination was almost corrected anatomically from a preoperative rTSA angle of 16.2° ± 6.4° to 2.4° ± 3.5° postoperatively, irrespective of the use of Signature ONE Planner. In comparison, the average correction of retroversion was worse and achieved to a lower degree but the use of Signature ONE Planner significantly improved the correction of retroversion in all 3 parts of the glenoid to an almost anatomical level (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). In both groups, the sphere bone overhang distance was between 4 and 5 mm without scapular notching.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and Conclusion</h3><div>The anatomical correction of a retroverted glenoid with a hemi-wedge baseplate can be considerably improved by the preoperative use of the Signature ONE planning system. Preoperative planning can thus help surgeons to achieve an optimal baseplate position and may thus improve the correction of the glenoid retroversion after rTSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 561-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Glenoid version and inclination can be corrected with an augmented baseplate during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) procedures. To achieve an optimal correction of both glenoid version and inclination, this study investigated whether the preoperative use of a 3-dimensional planning system improved the correction of glenoid anatomy in terms of glenoid version (0°) and inclination (rTSA 0°).

Methods

We measured preoperative and postoperative glenoid version and inclination by rTSA angle by x-ray and computed tomography scans in 50 prospective cases of rTSA with wedged baseplates. All patients underwent an rTSA due to osteoarthritis and rotator cuff insufficiency. All 50 patients underwent rTSA with the use of a hemi-wedge to correct the glenoid morphology. Twenty five patients additionally underwent a preoperative planning with the Signature ONE Planner to determine the exact rotational position of the hemi-wedge. rTSA angle was determined in preoperative and postoperative x-rays, and glenoid version was determined in preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans at 3 different glenoid levels. The Signature ONE Planner system determined the rotation, position, and size of the hemi-wedge (10°, 20°, or 30°). A control group of 25 patients underwent hemi-wedge rTSA without preoperative planning. The position of the sphere and the sphere bone overhang distance (mm) was determined in both groups.

Results

In all 50 patients, the inclination was almost corrected anatomically from a preoperative rTSA angle of 16.2° ± 6.4° to 2.4° ± 3.5° postoperatively, irrespective of the use of Signature ONE Planner. In comparison, the average correction of retroversion was worse and achieved to a lower degree but the use of Signature ONE Planner significantly improved the correction of retroversion in all 3 parts of the glenoid to an almost anatomical level (P < .0001). In both groups, the sphere bone overhang distance was between 4 and 5 mm without scapular notching.

Discussion and Conclusion

The anatomical correction of a retroverted glenoid with a hemi-wedge baseplate can be considerably improved by the preoperative use of the Signature ONE planning system. Preoperative planning can thus help surgeons to achieve an optimal baseplate position and may thus improve the correction of the glenoid retroversion after rTSA.
术前三维规划优化肩关节置换术中使用半楔形增强基板的盂后翻矫正
背景:在反向肩关节置换术(rTSA)过程中,关节盂的变形和倾斜可以用增强的底板矫正。为了实现最佳的关节盂形态和倾角矫正,本研究探讨了术前使用三维规划系统是否能改善关节盂形态(0°)和倾角(rTSA 0°)的关节盂解剖矫正。方法通过x线和ct扫描测量50例楔形基板rTSA患者术前和术后关节盂内径和关节盂内倾。所有患者均因骨关节炎和肩袖功能不全接受了rTSA。所有50例患者均接受了rTSA,并使用半楔骨矫正肩关节形态。另外,25例患者接受了Signature ONE Planner的术前计划,以确定半楔形的确切旋转位置。术前和术后x线确定rTSA角度,术前和术后3个不同关节盂的计算机断层扫描确定关节盂形态。Signature ONE Planner系统可确定半楔的旋转、位置和尺寸(10°、20°或30°)。对照组25例患者行半楔形rTSA,无术前计划。测定两组球的位置及球骨悬垂距离(mm)。结果50例患者术前rTSA角度为16.2°±6.4°至术后2.4°±3.5°,与使用Signature ONE Planner无关,均得到解剖矫正。相比之下,关节后倾的平均矫正效果较差,矫正程度较低,但Signature ONE Planner的使用显著改善了关节盂所有3个部位的后倾矫正,使其几乎达到解剖水平(P < .0001)。两组球骨悬垂距离均在4 ~ 5mm之间,无肩胛骨切迹。讨论与结论术前使用Signature ONE计划系统可显著改善半楔型关节臼内翻的解剖矫正。因此,术前计划可以帮助外科医生获得最佳的底板位置,从而改善rTSA后关节盂内翻的矫正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书