Benchmarking pathology foundation models for predicting microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer histopathology

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mohsin Bilal , Muhammad Aamir Gulzar , Nazish Jaffar , Abdulrahman Alabduljabbar , Youssef Altherwy , Anas Alsuhaibani , Fahdah Almarshad
{"title":"Benchmarking pathology foundation models for predicting microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer histopathology","authors":"Mohsin Bilal ,&nbsp;Muhammad Aamir Gulzar ,&nbsp;Nazish Jaffar ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Alabduljabbar ,&nbsp;Youssef Altherwy ,&nbsp;Anas Alsuhaibani ,&nbsp;Fahdah Almarshad","doi":"10.1016/j.compmedimag.2025.102680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid evolution of pathology foundation models necessitates rigorous benchmarking for clinical tasks. We evaluated three leading foundation models, UNI, Virchow2, and CONCH, for predicting microsatellite instability status from colorectal cancer whole-slide images, an essential routine clinical test. Our comprehensive framework assessed stain, tissue, and resolution invariance using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, USA; n = 409) and Pathology Artificial Intelligence Platform (PAIP, South Korea; training n = 47, testing n = 21 and n = 78). We developed an efficient pipeline with minimal preprocessing, omitting stain normalization, color augmentation, and tumor segmentation. To improve contextual encoding, we applied a five-crop strategy per patch, averaging embeddings from the center and four peripheral crops. We compared three slide-level aggregation and four efficient adaptation strategies. CONCH, using 2-cluster aggregation and ProtoNet adaptation, achieved top balanced accuracies (0.775 and 0.778) in external validation on PAIP. Conversely, UNI, with mean-averaging aggregation and ANN adaptation, excelled in TCGA cross-validation (0.778) but not in external validation (0.764), suggesting potential overfitting. The proposed 5-Crop augmentation enhances robustness to scale in UNI and CONCH and reflects intrinsic invariance achieved by Virchow2 through large-scale pretraining. For prescreening, CONCH demonstrated specificity of 0.65 and 0.45 at sensitivities of 0.90 and 0.94, respectively, highlighting its effectiveness in identifying stable cases and minimizing number of rapid molecular tests needed. Interestingly, a fine-tuned ResNet34 adaptation achieved superior performance (0.836) in the smaller internal validation cohort, suggesting current pathology foundation models training recipes may not sufficiently generalize without task-specific fine-tuning. Interpretability analyses using CONCH’s multimodal embeddings identified plasma cells as key morphological features differentiating microsatellite instability from stability, validated by pathologists (accuracy up to 92.4 %). This study underscores the feasibility and clinical significance of adapting foundation models to enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50631,"journal":{"name":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 102680"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611125001892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid evolution of pathology foundation models necessitates rigorous benchmarking for clinical tasks. We evaluated three leading foundation models, UNI, Virchow2, and CONCH, for predicting microsatellite instability status from colorectal cancer whole-slide images, an essential routine clinical test. Our comprehensive framework assessed stain, tissue, and resolution invariance using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, USA; n = 409) and Pathology Artificial Intelligence Platform (PAIP, South Korea; training n = 47, testing n = 21 and n = 78). We developed an efficient pipeline with minimal preprocessing, omitting stain normalization, color augmentation, and tumor segmentation. To improve contextual encoding, we applied a five-crop strategy per patch, averaging embeddings from the center and four peripheral crops. We compared three slide-level aggregation and four efficient adaptation strategies. CONCH, using 2-cluster aggregation and ProtoNet adaptation, achieved top balanced accuracies (0.775 and 0.778) in external validation on PAIP. Conversely, UNI, with mean-averaging aggregation and ANN adaptation, excelled in TCGA cross-validation (0.778) but not in external validation (0.764), suggesting potential overfitting. The proposed 5-Crop augmentation enhances robustness to scale in UNI and CONCH and reflects intrinsic invariance achieved by Virchow2 through large-scale pretraining. For prescreening, CONCH demonstrated specificity of 0.65 and 0.45 at sensitivities of 0.90 and 0.94, respectively, highlighting its effectiveness in identifying stable cases and minimizing number of rapid molecular tests needed. Interestingly, a fine-tuned ResNet34 adaptation achieved superior performance (0.836) in the smaller internal validation cohort, suggesting current pathology foundation models training recipes may not sufficiently generalize without task-specific fine-tuning. Interpretability analyses using CONCH’s multimodal embeddings identified plasma cells as key morphological features differentiating microsatellite instability from stability, validated by pathologists (accuracy up to 92.4 %). This study underscores the feasibility and clinical significance of adapting foundation models to enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient outcomes.
预测结直肠癌组织病理学微卫星不稳定性的基准病理学基础模型
病理基础模型的快速发展需要对临床任务进行严格的基准测试。我们评估了三种主要的基础模型UNI、Virchow2和CONCH,用于预测结直肠癌全切片图像的微卫星不稳定状态,这是一项重要的常规临床测试。我们的综合框架使用来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA,美国;n = 409)和病理学人工智能平台(PAIP,韩国;训练n = 47,测试n = 21和n = 78)的数据集评估染色、组织和分辨率不变性。我们开发了一个高效的流水线,减少了预处理,省略了染色归一化,颜色增强和肿瘤分割。为了改进上下文编码,我们应用了每个补丁的五种作物策略,平均中心和四个外围作物的嵌入。我们比较了三种幻灯片级聚合和四种有效的适应策略。CONCH采用2簇聚合和ProtoNet自适应,在PAIP的外部验证中获得了最高的平衡精度(0.775和0.778)。相反,具有平均聚合和人工神经网络适应的UNI在TCGA交叉验证中表现出色(0.778),但在外部验证中表现不佳(0.764),表明可能存在过拟合。提出的5-Crop增强方法增强了UNI和CONCH的规模鲁棒性,并反映了Virchow2通过大规模预训练实现的内在不变性。对于预筛选,CONCH的特异性分别为0.65和0.45,敏感性分别为0.90和0.94,突出了其在识别稳定病例和减少所需快速分子检测数量方面的有效性。有趣的是,经过微调的ResNet34自适应在较小的内部验证队列中获得了更好的表现(0.836),这表明如果没有针对特定任务的微调,目前的病理基础模型训练方法可能无法充分推广。使用CONCH多模态嵌入的可解释性分析确定了浆细胞是区分微卫星不稳定性和稳定性的关键形态学特征,经病理学家验证(准确率高达92.4 %)。本研究强调了调整基础模型以提高诊断效率和患者预后的可行性和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
3.50%
发文量
71
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics is to act as a source for the exchange of research results concerning algorithmic advances, development, and application of digital imaging in disease detection, diagnosis, intervention, prevention, precision medicine, and population health. Included in the journal will be articles on novel computerized imaging or visualization techniques, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, augmented reality for surgical planning and guidance, big biomedical data visualization, computer-aided diagnosis, computerized-robotic surgery, image-guided therapy, imaging scanning and reconstruction, mobile and tele-imaging, radiomics, and imaging integration and modeling with other information relevant to digital health. The types of biomedical imaging include: magnetic resonance, computed tomography, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, X-ray, microwave, optical and multi-photon microscopy, video and sensory imaging, and the convergence of biomedical images with other non-imaging datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书