Comparative assessment of cough capacity in patients with neuromuscular disease: Spirometer versus portable peak flow meter

IF 0.6 Q3 Medicine
Rehabilitacion Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rh.2025.100955
A. Balañá Corberó , J. Martínez Llorens
{"title":"Comparative assessment of cough capacity in patients with neuromuscular disease: Spirometer versus portable peak flow meter","authors":"A. Balañá Corberó ,&nbsp;J. Martínez Llorens","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cough impairment in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) increases pulmonary infection risk. Peak cough flow (PCF) is crucial for assessment, with spirometry (PCFs) as gold standard. Portable peak flow meters (PCFp) are practical, yet their comparability with spirometers in NMD remains debated. This study compared PCFs and PCFp in NMD patients with restrictive lung disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, cross-sectional observational study included patients with NMD from a home mechanical ventilation unit. Inclusion criteria comprised a definitive diagnosis of NMD and the ability to perform forced expiratory maneuvers. PCF was measured using a calibrated spirometer (PCFs) and a portable peak flow meter (PCFp) in randomized order. The measurement protocol followed ATS/ERS 2019 standards. Agreement was evaluated using the Bland–Altman method and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Data normality was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test. A <em>p</em>-value<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-seven patients (62.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.9 years; 46.3% female) with various NMD where included. No significant difference was found between mean PCFs (314.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->98.5<!--> <!-->L/min) and PCFp (301.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->100.1<!--> <!-->L/min) (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.4535). The ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.95). The Bland–Altman analysis indicated a mean difference of 12.9<!--> <!-->L/min (limits of agreement ranged from −52.7<!--> <!-->L/min to 78.5<!--> <!-->L/min). A strong correlation was observed (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.949, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Impaired cough capacity (35.8% of patients) was linked to older age and poorer function. No device differences were found within subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PCPp demonstrates an acceptable level of agreement with PCPs in NMD patients. PCPp is a reliable and accessible screening tool for home monitoring. However, the wide limits of agreement observed necessitate further studies involving larger, possibly specific, patient populations to definitively establish the full clinical interchangeability required for therapeutic decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 4","pages":"Article 100955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cough impairment in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) increases pulmonary infection risk. Peak cough flow (PCF) is crucial for assessment, with spirometry (PCFs) as gold standard. Portable peak flow meters (PCFp) are practical, yet their comparability with spirometers in NMD remains debated. This study compared PCFs and PCFp in NMD patients with restrictive lung disease.

Methods

A prospective, cross-sectional observational study included patients with NMD from a home mechanical ventilation unit. Inclusion criteria comprised a definitive diagnosis of NMD and the ability to perform forced expiratory maneuvers. PCF was measured using a calibrated spirometer (PCFs) and a portable peak flow meter (PCFp) in randomized order. The measurement protocol followed ATS/ERS 2019 standards. Agreement was evaluated using the Bland–Altman method and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Data normality was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sixty-seven patients (62.1 ± 14.9 years; 46.3% female) with various NMD where included. No significant difference was found between mean PCFs (314.5 ± 98.5 L/min) and PCFp (301.6 ± 100.1 L/min) (p = 0.4535). The ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.95). The Bland–Altman analysis indicated a mean difference of 12.9 L/min (limits of agreement ranged from −52.7 L/min to 78.5 L/min). A strong correlation was observed (r = 0.949, p < 0.001). Impaired cough capacity (35.8% of patients) was linked to older age and poorer function. No device differences were found within subgroups.

Conclusion

PCPp demonstrates an acceptable level of agreement with PCPs in NMD patients. PCPp is a reliable and accessible screening tool for home monitoring. However, the wide limits of agreement observed necessitate further studies involving larger, possibly specific, patient populations to definitively establish the full clinical interchangeability required for therapeutic decision-making.
神经肌肉疾病患者咳嗽能力的比较评估:肺量计与便携式峰值流量计
神经肌肉疾病(NMD)的咳嗽障碍增加肺部感染的风险。咳流量峰值(PCF)是评估的关键,肺活量测定(PCF)是金标准。便携式峰值流量计(PCFp)是实用的,但其与NMD肺活量计的可比性仍存在争议。本研究比较了NMD合并限制性肺疾病患者的PCFs和PCFp。方法一项前瞻性、横断面观察性研究纳入了来自家用机械通气装置的NMD患者。纳入标准包括NMD的明确诊断和执行强制呼气操作的能力。PCF采用校准后的肺活量计(PCF)和便携式峰值流量计(PCFp),按随机顺序进行测量。测量方案遵循ATS/ERS 2019标准。使用Bland-Altman方法和类内相关系数(ICC)评估一致性。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估数据的正态性。p值<; 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果67例患者(62.1±14.9岁,女性46.3%)均患有不同程度的NMD。PCFs平均值(314.5±98.5 L/min)与PCFp平均值(301.6±100.1 L/min)无统计学差异(p = 0.4535)。ICC为0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95)。Bland-Altman分析显示平均差异为12.9 L/min(一致性范围为- 52.7 L/min至78.5 L/min)。相关性强(r = 0.949, p < 0.001)。咳嗽能力受损(35.8%的患者)与年龄较大和功能较差有关。亚组内未发现设备差异。结论pcpp与pcp在NMD患者中的一致性可接受。PCPp是一种可靠且易于使用的家庭监测筛查工具。然而,观察到的广泛的一致性限制需要进一步的研究,涉及更大的,可能特定的患者群体,以明确地建立治疗决策所需的完全临床互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书