A framework for effective mentor teacher written feedback to pre-service teachers

Q1 Social Sciences
Chrissy Monteleone , Matthew Winslade , Amanda Isaac , Monica Wong , Michelle Gorzanelli , Cathy Lembke , Anne McLeod
{"title":"A framework for effective mentor teacher written feedback to pre-service teachers","authors":"Chrissy Monteleone ,&nbsp;Matthew Winslade ,&nbsp;Amanda Isaac ,&nbsp;Monica Wong ,&nbsp;Michelle Gorzanelli ,&nbsp;Cathy Lembke ,&nbsp;Anne McLeod","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-quality professional experience, guided by expert mentor teachers, is critical to the successful transition and long-term retention of pre-service teachers in the profession. Effective mentor teacher written feedback is central to this process, supporting pre-service teachers to meet course requirements and become profession ready. However, in the post-pandemic context, marked by teacher shortages, many final-year pre-service teachers have not received quality written feedback that meaningfully supports their professional growth. This study aimed to understand the significance of written feedback in supporting high-quality professional experience placements, with a focus on the written feedback provided by the mentor teachers in the final professional experience written report template. A research-informed framework was conceptualised to evaluate and critique the feedback opportunities presented by these written report templates. The analysis revealed a need for redesigning the written report templates to encourage mentor teachers to provide targeted, meaningful, research-informed feedback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374025001293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality professional experience, guided by expert mentor teachers, is critical to the successful transition and long-term retention of pre-service teachers in the profession. Effective mentor teacher written feedback is central to this process, supporting pre-service teachers to meet course requirements and become profession ready. However, in the post-pandemic context, marked by teacher shortages, many final-year pre-service teachers have not received quality written feedback that meaningfully supports their professional growth. This study aimed to understand the significance of written feedback in supporting high-quality professional experience placements, with a focus on the written feedback provided by the mentor teachers in the final professional experience written report template. A research-informed framework was conceptualised to evaluate and critique the feedback opportunities presented by these written report templates. The analysis revealed a need for redesigning the written report templates to encourage mentor teachers to provide targeted, meaningful, research-informed feedback.
一个有效的导师教师书面反馈给职前教师的框架
高质量的专业经验,在专家导师教师的指导下,是成功过渡和长期留住职前教师的关键。有效的导师教师书面反馈是这一过程的核心,支持职前教师满足课程要求并为职业做好准备。然而,在大流行后教师短缺的背景下,许多最后一年的职前教师没有收到有效支持其专业成长的高质量书面反馈。本研究旨在了解书面反馈在支持高质量专业体验实习中的意义,重点关注导师教师在最终的专业体验书面报告模板中提供的书面反馈。一个研究知情的框架被概念化,以评估和批评这些书面报告模板所提供的反馈机会。分析显示,需要重新设计书面报告模板,以鼓励导师教师提供有针对性的、有意义的、研究知情的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书