{"title":"The roles of lean and corporate social responsibility in acquisitions","authors":"Yuqi Peng , Zhihao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study how Lean operations and corporate social responsibility (CSR) jointly influence manufacturers’ decisions to pursue acquisitions. Lean improves efficiency through waste reduction but also removes resource buffers, making firms more cautious about the uncertainty, integration challenges, and potential operational disruptions of acquisitions. In contrast, CSR builds stakeholder trust, buffers risk, and broadens strategic flexibility, which can reduce perceived integration risks and increase willingness to engage in acquisitions. Using data from U.S. manufacturing firms (2005–2016) and bootstrap-based conditional logit models, we find that Lean reduces acquisition likelihood, while CSR attenuates this effect. We further find that the moderating role of CSR can be different, contingent on the multi-dimensional impacts of CSR, where environmental and social CSR dimensions encourage acquisitions, whereas governance discourages them. Theoretical and managerial insights are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103483"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325002099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We study how Lean operations and corporate social responsibility (CSR) jointly influence manufacturers’ decisions to pursue acquisitions. Lean improves efficiency through waste reduction but also removes resource buffers, making firms more cautious about the uncertainty, integration challenges, and potential operational disruptions of acquisitions. In contrast, CSR builds stakeholder trust, buffers risk, and broadens strategic flexibility, which can reduce perceived integration risks and increase willingness to engage in acquisitions. Using data from U.S. manufacturing firms (2005–2016) and bootstrap-based conditional logit models, we find that Lean reduces acquisition likelihood, while CSR attenuates this effect. We further find that the moderating role of CSR can be different, contingent on the multi-dimensional impacts of CSR, where environmental and social CSR dimensions encourage acquisitions, whereas governance discourages them. Theoretical and managerial insights are also discussed.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.