Digital twins in supply chain management: Scope and methodological issues

IF 10.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Latifa Benhamou , Vincent Giard , Samir Lamouri
{"title":"Digital twins in supply chain management: Scope and methodological issues","authors":"Latifa Benhamou ,&nbsp;Vincent Giard ,&nbsp;Samir Lamouri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the implementation of Digital Twins (DTs) in Supply Chain Management (SCM), highlighting the gap between their conceptual promise and practical applications. DTs are recognised for their potential to correct real-time deviations and anticipate and prevent disruptions as they emerge; however, operational deployments in SCM remain rare. Numerous studies mislabel simulation models or Digital Shadows (DSs) as DTs, blurring essential distinctions. To address this issue, this paper adopts a praxeological approach that aims to situate observed implementations within their decision-making context. From this perspective, we propose a novel methodological framework that integrates the historical evolution of supply chain information and decision systems with a multi-dimensional analysis grid, outlining technological progress from simulators to DSs and DTs. This grid evaluates core DT functionalities (simulation, detection, anticipation and correction) across 51 empirical case studies, providing granular insights into maturity levels and AI-enhanced patterns. The results show that most models support monitoring and decision-making, but only 16 % achieve closed-loop capabilities typical of fully functional DTs, mainly in closed systems. In contrast, open systems still depend on human intervention, although AI can increasingly support such contexts. This praxeological approach provides critical and evidence-based snapshots of actual implementations. It offers researchers a clarified conceptual lens and practitioners empirically grounded guidance, outlining avenues for future inquiry and a reflective framework to guide the development and governance of DTs in supply chains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"291 ","pages":"Article 109842"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325003275","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the implementation of Digital Twins (DTs) in Supply Chain Management (SCM), highlighting the gap between their conceptual promise and practical applications. DTs are recognised for their potential to correct real-time deviations and anticipate and prevent disruptions as they emerge; however, operational deployments in SCM remain rare. Numerous studies mislabel simulation models or Digital Shadows (DSs) as DTs, blurring essential distinctions. To address this issue, this paper adopts a praxeological approach that aims to situate observed implementations within their decision-making context. From this perspective, we propose a novel methodological framework that integrates the historical evolution of supply chain information and decision systems with a multi-dimensional analysis grid, outlining technological progress from simulators to DSs and DTs. This grid evaluates core DT functionalities (simulation, detection, anticipation and correction) across 51 empirical case studies, providing granular insights into maturity levels and AI-enhanced patterns. The results show that most models support monitoring and decision-making, but only 16 % achieve closed-loop capabilities typical of fully functional DTs, mainly in closed systems. In contrast, open systems still depend on human intervention, although AI can increasingly support such contexts. This praxeological approach provides critical and evidence-based snapshots of actual implementations. It offers researchers a clarified conceptual lens and practitioners empirically grounded guidance, outlining avenues for future inquiry and a reflective framework to guide the development and governance of DTs in supply chains.
供应链管理中的数字孪生:范围和方法问题
本文研究了数字孪生(DTs)在供应链管理(SCM)中的实施,突出了其概念承诺与实际应用之间的差距。DTs因其纠正实时偏差和预测和防止出现中断的潜力而得到认可;然而,在SCM中的操作部署仍然很少见。许多研究错误地将仿真模型或数字阴影(DSs)标记为dt,模糊了本质上的区别。为了解决这个问题,本文采用了一种行动学方法,旨在将观察到的实现置于决策环境中。从这个角度来看,我们提出了一个新的方法框架,该框架将供应链信息和决策系统的历史演变与多维分析网格相结合,概述了从模拟器到决策系统和决策系统的技术进步。该网格评估了51个实证案例研究中的核心DT功能(模拟、检测、预测和校正),提供了对成熟度级别和人工智能增强模式的细粒度见解。结果表明,大多数模型支持监控和决策,但只有16%的模型实现了全功能dt的典型闭环能力,主要是在封闭系统中。相比之下,开放系统仍然依赖于人为干预,尽管人工智能可以越来越多地支持这种情况。这种行为学方法提供了实际实现的关键和基于证据的快照。它为研究人员提供了一个明确的概念视角,为实践者提供了基于经验的指导,概述了未来调查的途径,并为指导供应链中直销的发展和治理提供了一个反思框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书