Structural Brain Abnormalities and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Post-COVID Condition.

Meghann Ryan, Jared Thomas, Jeremy Wang, Huajun Liang, Eric Cunningham, Thomas Ernst, Linda Chang
{"title":"Structural Brain Abnormalities and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Post-COVID Condition.","authors":"Meghann Ryan, Jared Thomas, Jeremy Wang, Huajun Liang, Eric Cunningham, Thomas Ernst, Linda Chang","doi":"10.1515/nipt-2025-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to cross-sectionally and longitudinally compare brain morphometry and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and evaluate their relationship, in participants with Post-Coronavirus Disease Condition (PCC) and healthy Controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At Baseline, 29 PCC (19 female; average age=42.4±12.2 years; 242±156 days since infection) and 25 Controls (14 female; 44.1±12.3 years) completed the NIH Toolbox Emotion, Motor and Cognition Batteries; Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); and structural brain MRI (thickness, areas, volumes). We compared neurobehavioral performance on the NIH Toolbox and PROMIS and structural brain morphometry for 34 cortical regions and 8 subcortical volumes, between PCC and matched Controls at Baseline (~8 months post-infection) and 11 PCC and 7 Controls at a Follow-Up Visit (~3 years post-infection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At Baseline, PCC had significantly larger putamen and amygdala (FDR-corrected <i>p</i>=0.04; +5.3 and 5.9%) and a trend for larger hippocampus and accumbens (uncorrected-<i>p</i>=0.012 and 0.027, +5.1 and 12.9%) than Controls. PCC also tended to have 4 thicker cortices (<i>p</i>=0.010-0.049; +3.6-6.5%), 6 larger surface areas (<i>p</i>=0.009-0.023; +5.9-8.6%), and 9 larger cortical volumes (<i>p</i>=0.003-0.008; +4.2-10.7%). These abnormal measures were associated with more anxiety, depression, and pain (<i>r</i>=0.5-0.75; <i>p</i>=0.005-0.04). At Follow-Up, PCC had more sadness, fear, pain, and fatigue compared to Controls. However, group differences in morphometry diminished and PCC neurobehavioral performance tended to improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structural abnormalities in PCC suggest compensatory processes such as enhanced myelination or neurogenesis, rather than neuroinflammation, which in turn may contribute to persistent neurobehavioral symptoms. However, these alterations and symptoms may improve three years after infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74278,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImmune pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImmune pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/nipt-2025-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to cross-sectionally and longitudinally compare brain morphometry and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and evaluate their relationship, in participants with Post-Coronavirus Disease Condition (PCC) and healthy Controls.

Methods: At Baseline, 29 PCC (19 female; average age=42.4±12.2 years; 242±156 days since infection) and 25 Controls (14 female; 44.1±12.3 years) completed the NIH Toolbox Emotion, Motor and Cognition Batteries; Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); and structural brain MRI (thickness, areas, volumes). We compared neurobehavioral performance on the NIH Toolbox and PROMIS and structural brain morphometry for 34 cortical regions and 8 subcortical volumes, between PCC and matched Controls at Baseline (~8 months post-infection) and 11 PCC and 7 Controls at a Follow-Up Visit (~3 years post-infection).

Results: At Baseline, PCC had significantly larger putamen and amygdala (FDR-corrected p=0.04; +5.3 and 5.9%) and a trend for larger hippocampus and accumbens (uncorrected-p=0.012 and 0.027, +5.1 and 12.9%) than Controls. PCC also tended to have 4 thicker cortices (p=0.010-0.049; +3.6-6.5%), 6 larger surface areas (p=0.009-0.023; +5.9-8.6%), and 9 larger cortical volumes (p=0.003-0.008; +4.2-10.7%). These abnormal measures were associated with more anxiety, depression, and pain (r=0.5-0.75; p=0.005-0.04). At Follow-Up, PCC had more sadness, fear, pain, and fatigue compared to Controls. However, group differences in morphometry diminished and PCC neurobehavioral performance tended to improve.

Conclusions: Structural abnormalities in PCC suggest compensatory processes such as enhanced myelination or neurogenesis, rather than neuroinflammation, which in turn may contribute to persistent neurobehavioral symptoms. However, these alterations and symptoms may improve three years after infection.

新冠肺炎后脑结构异常和神经精神症状
目的:我们旨在横断面和纵向比较冠状病毒后疾病(PCC)和健康对照者的脑形态计量学和神经精神症状,并评估它们之间的关系。方法:基线时,29例PCC患者(女性19例,平均年龄42.4±12.2岁,感染后242±156天)和25例对照组(女性14例,44.1±12.3岁)完成了NIH工具箱情绪、运动和认知电池;患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS);以及脑部结构MRI(厚度、面积、体积)。我们比较了PCC和匹配对照组在基线时(感染后约8个月)的34个皮质区域和8个皮质下体积的神经行为表现,以及随访时(感染后约3年)11个PCC和7个对照组的神经行为表现。结果:在基线时,PCC的壳核和杏仁核明显大于对照组(fdr校正p=0.04; +5.3和5.9%),海马和伏隔核也有增大的趋势(未校正p=0.012和0.027,+5.1和12.9%)。PCC也倾向于有4个更厚的皮质(p=0.010-0.049; +3.6-6.5%), 6个更大的表面积(p=0.009-0.023; +5.9-8.6%)和9个更大的皮质体积(p=0.003-0.008; +4.2-10.7%)。这些异常测量与更多的焦虑、抑郁和疼痛相关(r=0.5-0.75; p=0.005-0.04)。在随访中,与对照组相比,PCC患者有更多的悲伤、恐惧、疼痛和疲劳。然而,组间形态学差异减小,PCC神经行为表现趋于改善。结论:PCC的结构异常提示代偿过程,如髓鞘形成或神经发生增强,而不是神经炎症,这反过来可能导致持续的神经行为症状。然而,这些改变和症状可能在感染三年后改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书