Lars Schäfer, Franziska Dickel, Karl Strohmayer, Werner Koele, Bettina Leber, Robert Sucher, Philipp Stiegler
{"title":"Early detection of postoperative infections using continuous temperature monitoring: A prospective clinical trial.","authors":"Lars Schäfer, Franziska Dickel, Karl Strohmayer, Werner Koele, Bettina Leber, Robert Sucher, Philipp Stiegler","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01383-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous axillary temperature monitoring using a wearable patch enables earlier detection of postoperative infections compared to conventional intermittent infrared thermometry. 103 surgical patients were included in this prospective, single-center study and monitored over an 11-month period. Continuous axillary temperature monitoring using the SteadyTemp<sup>®</sup> patch was compared to routine infrared measurements performed as part of clinical routine. The primary outcome was fever detection rate (≥ 38.0 °C). Secondary outcomes included the correlation between fever detection and laboratory values as well as the frequency of clinical interventions. Out of 103 included patients, fever was detected in 33 cases. Continuous monitoring identified fever in 31 of these 33 patients (93.9%), whereas infrared thermometry detected fever in only 12 cases (36.4%). In 16 cases where antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted due to newly detected fever, the patch detected fever in 15 patients, compared to only 7 detections by infrared thermometry. Surgical interventions due to suspected infections were performed in 5 patients, and fever was detected by the patch in all cases, while infrared thermometry detected fever in only 2 of these patients. Due to the frequent failure of infrared thermometry to detect fever, a scoring system was developed to assess the clinical relevance of fever detection. Continuous temperature monitoring with the SteadyTemp<sup>®</sup> patch demonstrated superior fever detection compared to infrared thermometry, leading to earlier identification of febrile events. This study suggests that continuous temperature monitoring may enhance infection surveillance in surgical patients, allowing for more timely clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"721-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01383-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous axillary temperature monitoring using a wearable patch enables earlier detection of postoperative infections compared to conventional intermittent infrared thermometry. 103 surgical patients were included in this prospective, single-center study and monitored over an 11-month period. Continuous axillary temperature monitoring using the SteadyTemp® patch was compared to routine infrared measurements performed as part of clinical routine. The primary outcome was fever detection rate (≥ 38.0 °C). Secondary outcomes included the correlation between fever detection and laboratory values as well as the frequency of clinical interventions. Out of 103 included patients, fever was detected in 33 cases. Continuous monitoring identified fever in 31 of these 33 patients (93.9%), whereas infrared thermometry detected fever in only 12 cases (36.4%). In 16 cases where antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted due to newly detected fever, the patch detected fever in 15 patients, compared to only 7 detections by infrared thermometry. Surgical interventions due to suspected infections were performed in 5 patients, and fever was detected by the patch in all cases, while infrared thermometry detected fever in only 2 of these patients. Due to the frequent failure of infrared thermometry to detect fever, a scoring system was developed to assess the clinical relevance of fever detection. Continuous temperature monitoring with the SteadyTemp® patch demonstrated superior fever detection compared to infrared thermometry, leading to earlier identification of febrile events. This study suggests that continuous temperature monitoring may enhance infection surveillance in surgical patients, allowing for more timely clinical interventions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.