Early detection of postoperative infections using continuous temperature monitoring: A prospective clinical trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lars Schäfer, Franziska Dickel, Karl Strohmayer, Werner Koele, Bettina Leber, Robert Sucher, Philipp Stiegler
{"title":"Early detection of postoperative infections using continuous temperature monitoring: A prospective clinical trial.","authors":"Lars Schäfer, Franziska Dickel, Karl Strohmayer, Werner Koele, Bettina Leber, Robert Sucher, Philipp Stiegler","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01383-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous axillary temperature monitoring using a wearable patch enables earlier detection of postoperative infections compared to conventional intermittent infrared thermometry. 103 surgical patients were included in this prospective, single-center study and monitored over an 11-month period. Continuous axillary temperature monitoring using the SteadyTemp<sup>®</sup> patch was compared to routine infrared measurements performed as part of clinical routine. The primary outcome was fever detection rate (≥ 38.0 °C). Secondary outcomes included the correlation between fever detection and laboratory values as well as the frequency of clinical interventions. Out of 103 included patients, fever was detected in 33 cases. Continuous monitoring identified fever in 31 of these 33 patients (93.9%), whereas infrared thermometry detected fever in only 12 cases (36.4%). In 16 cases where antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted due to newly detected fever, the patch detected fever in 15 patients, compared to only 7 detections by infrared thermometry. Surgical interventions due to suspected infections were performed in 5 patients, and fever was detected by the patch in all cases, while infrared thermometry detected fever in only 2 of these patients. Due to the frequent failure of infrared thermometry to detect fever, a scoring system was developed to assess the clinical relevance of fever detection. Continuous temperature monitoring with the SteadyTemp<sup>®</sup> patch demonstrated superior fever detection compared to infrared thermometry, leading to earlier identification of febrile events. This study suggests that continuous temperature monitoring may enhance infection surveillance in surgical patients, allowing for more timely clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"721-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01383-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous axillary temperature monitoring using a wearable patch enables earlier detection of postoperative infections compared to conventional intermittent infrared thermometry. 103 surgical patients were included in this prospective, single-center study and monitored over an 11-month period. Continuous axillary temperature monitoring using the SteadyTemp® patch was compared to routine infrared measurements performed as part of clinical routine. The primary outcome was fever detection rate (≥ 38.0 °C). Secondary outcomes included the correlation between fever detection and laboratory values as well as the frequency of clinical interventions. Out of 103 included patients, fever was detected in 33 cases. Continuous monitoring identified fever in 31 of these 33 patients (93.9%), whereas infrared thermometry detected fever in only 12 cases (36.4%). In 16 cases where antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted due to newly detected fever, the patch detected fever in 15 patients, compared to only 7 detections by infrared thermometry. Surgical interventions due to suspected infections were performed in 5 patients, and fever was detected by the patch in all cases, while infrared thermometry detected fever in only 2 of these patients. Due to the frequent failure of infrared thermometry to detect fever, a scoring system was developed to assess the clinical relevance of fever detection. Continuous temperature monitoring with the SteadyTemp® patch demonstrated superior fever detection compared to infrared thermometry, leading to earlier identification of febrile events. This study suggests that continuous temperature monitoring may enhance infection surveillance in surgical patients, allowing for more timely clinical interventions.

使用连续体温监测早期检测术后感染:一项前瞻性临床试验。
本研究旨在评估与传统的间歇红外测温相比,使用可穿戴贴片进行连续腋窝温度监测是否能更早地发现术后感染。103例手术患者纳入了这项前瞻性单中心研究,并在11个月的时间内进行了监测。使用SteadyTemp®贴片进行连续腋窝温度监测与常规红外测量作为临床常规的一部分进行比较。主要终点为发热检出率(≥38.0°C)。次要结果包括发热检测与实验室值之间的相关性以及临床干预的频率。在103例纳入的患者中,有33例发现发烧。连续监测发现33例患者中有31例(93.9%)发热,而红外测温仅发现12例(36.4%)发热。在16例因新发现发热而开始或调整抗生素治疗的患者中,贴片检测到15例发热,而红外测温仅检测到7例。5例患者因疑似感染进行了手术干预,所有病例均通过贴片检测到发热,而红外测温仅检测到其中2例患者发烧。由于红外测温仪经常无法检测发热,因此开发了一个评分系统来评估发热检测的临床相关性。与红外测温相比,SteadyTemp®贴片的连续温度监测显示出更好的发热检测,从而更早地识别发热事件。本研究提示,持续体温监测可以加强手术患者的感染监测,使临床干预更加及时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书