Posttransplant cells for the win? DLI and adoptive cell therapy to eradicate MRD.

IF 3.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Pleun Schonewille, Anna van Rhenen, Renske Mt Ten Ham, Moniek de Witte, Jürgen Kuball
{"title":"Posttransplant cells for the win? DLI and adoptive cell therapy to eradicate MRD.","authors":"Pleun Schonewille, Anna van Rhenen, Renske Mt Ten Ham, Moniek de Witte, Jürgen Kuball","doi":"10.1182/hematology.2025000747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relapse remains the leading cause of failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for hematologic malignancies. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), the infusion of lymphocytes from the original stem cell donor, was introduced in the late 1980s as a strategy to prevent or treat relapse by augmenting the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Over time, DLI has been used in various settings: initially as therapeutic DLI for overt relapse and later as preemptive DLI, administered in response to early signs of relapse, such as persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD), or as prophylactic DLI to mitigate high relapse risk before clinical relapse occurs (see Visual Abstract). However, questions remain regarding how, when, and in whom DLI is best deployed, reflecting ongoing controversy and heterogeneity in clinical practice. A recent survey of 165 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers across 43 countries reported that DLI was used prophylactically for high-risk hematologic diseases in 43.8% of these centers. DLI was used preemptively for MRD positivity in 86.9% of centers and for mixed chimerism in 73.1%. Therapeutic DLI was administered for hematologic relapse in 73.1% of centers. Active graft-versus-host disease and active infections were considered absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of the centers, respectively. This observed variability in center practices underscores the need to clarify the \"who, when, and why\" of posttransplant cellular interventions. In this review, we explore DLI strategies and the potential sequencing with novel targeted therapies across prophylactic, preemptive, and therapeutic applications, illustrated through case examples in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. We highlight findings from retrospective, as well as the scarce prospective studies and extend considerations to other indications, including chronic myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Additionally, we review emerging combination strategies with targeted therapies across different hematologic malignancies and adoptive cell therapies beyond conventional DLI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12973,"journal":{"name":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","volume":"2025 1","pages":"537-546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12891373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2025000747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relapse remains the leading cause of failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for hematologic malignancies. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), the infusion of lymphocytes from the original stem cell donor, was introduced in the late 1980s as a strategy to prevent or treat relapse by augmenting the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Over time, DLI has been used in various settings: initially as therapeutic DLI for overt relapse and later as preemptive DLI, administered in response to early signs of relapse, such as persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD), or as prophylactic DLI to mitigate high relapse risk before clinical relapse occurs (see Visual Abstract). However, questions remain regarding how, when, and in whom DLI is best deployed, reflecting ongoing controversy and heterogeneity in clinical practice. A recent survey of 165 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers across 43 countries reported that DLI was used prophylactically for high-risk hematologic diseases in 43.8% of these centers. DLI was used preemptively for MRD positivity in 86.9% of centers and for mixed chimerism in 73.1%. Therapeutic DLI was administered for hematologic relapse in 73.1% of centers. Active graft-versus-host disease and active infections were considered absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of the centers, respectively. This observed variability in center practices underscores the need to clarify the "who, when, and why" of posttransplant cellular interventions. In this review, we explore DLI strategies and the potential sequencing with novel targeted therapies across prophylactic, preemptive, and therapeutic applications, illustrated through case examples in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. We highlight findings from retrospective, as well as the scarce prospective studies and extend considerations to other indications, including chronic myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Additionally, we review emerging combination strategies with targeted therapies across different hematologic malignancies and adoptive cell therapies beyond conventional DLI.

移植后的细胞是否获胜?DLI和过继细胞疗法根除MRD。
复发仍然是恶性血液病同种异体干细胞移植后失败的主要原因。供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI),输注来自原始干细胞供体的淋巴细胞,于20世纪80年代末被引入,作为一种通过增强移植物抗白血病(GvL)效应来预防或治疗复发的策略。随着时间的推移,DLI已在各种情况下使用:最初作为明显复发的治疗性DLI,后来作为预防性DLI,用于应对早期复发迹象,如持续或复发的可测量残留疾病(MRD),或作为预防性DLI在临床复发发生之前减轻高复发风险(见视觉摘要)。然而,关于如何、何时以及在谁身上最好地部署DLI的问题仍然存在,这反映了临床实践中持续的争议和异质性。最近对43个国家的165个欧洲血液和骨髓移植协会中心进行的一项调查显示,在这些中心中,43.8%的中心预防性地使用DLI治疗高危血液病。DLI用于MRD阳性的中心占86.9%,混合嵌合的中心占73.1%。73.1%的中心对血液学复发给予治疗性DLI。活动性移植物抗宿主病和活动性感染分别被85.6%和57.5%的中心视为绝对禁忌症。这种在中心实践中观察到的可变性强调了澄清移植后细胞干预的“谁、何时和为什么”的必要性。在这篇综述中,我们通过急性髓性白血病患者的案例,探讨了DLI策略和潜在的新型靶向治疗方法,包括预防、先发制人和治疗应用。我们强调回顾性研究的结果,以及稀缺的前瞻性研究,并将考虑扩展到其他适应症,包括慢性髓性白血病、骨髓纤维化和急性淋巴细胞白血病。此外,我们回顾了针对不同血液恶性肿瘤的靶向治疗和传统DLI以外的过继细胞治疗的新兴联合策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-HEMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hematology, the ASH Education Program, is published annually by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in one volume per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书