A mouse-tracking study on visualization of panoramic radiographs among Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology faculty.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Li Zhen Lim, Chun Ning Fong, Joey Jia Yi Lee, Pei Hua Cher, Yu Fan Sim, Peggy P Lee
{"title":"A mouse-tracking study on visualization of panoramic radiographs among Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology faculty.","authors":"Li Zhen Lim, Chun Ning Fong, Joey Jia Yi Lee, Pei Hua Cher, Yu Fan Sim, Peggy P Lee","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Panoramic radiographs (PANs) are a commonly used dental imaging modality and are complex to evaluate. This study aimed to use mouse-tracking technology to identify the visualization characteristics of experienced Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology (OMR) faculty when reviewing PANs and to assess relationships with detection accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen OMR faculty in US dental schools with 5 to 38 years of experience were recruited. Participants were shown 17 PANs (5 \"Normal\" and 12 \"Pathology\") over Zoom and instructed to move their mouse cursor in sync with their eye movements. Data collection was based on video recordings with X, Y coordinates auto-detected using mouse-tracking algorithms. Parameters collected included detection accuracy, time taken, completeness of search coverage, revisits and search patterns used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most common search patterns were Dental to Periphery (41.5%) and Periphery to Dental (37.7%). The mean accuracy score for all cases with pathology was 84.8%. Except for 2 cases with subtle findings (condylar fracture and fibrous dysplasia), mean accuracy scores ranged from 76.5% to 100%. There were no associations between search patterns and detection accuracy. Participants took longer durations and performed more complete searches with more revisits on \"Normal\" cases. They were more likely to use shorter search times with smaller coverage and perform single searches when correctly detecting lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experienced OMRs were able to detect lesions without scanning the entire PAN and within a single search, regardless of the search pattern used.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This is the first study using mouse-tracking algorithms to evaluate visualization characteristics on PANs. Experienced OMRs can conduct efficient and accurate reviews of PANs regardless of search strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"327-335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13132168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Panoramic radiographs (PANs) are a commonly used dental imaging modality and are complex to evaluate. This study aimed to use mouse-tracking technology to identify the visualization characteristics of experienced Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology (OMR) faculty when reviewing PANs and to assess relationships with detection accuracy.

Methods: Seventeen OMR faculty in US dental schools with 5 to 38 years of experience were recruited. Participants were shown 17 PANs (5 "Normal" and 12 "Pathology") over Zoom and instructed to move their mouse cursor in sync with their eye movements. Data collection was based on video recordings with X, Y coordinates auto-detected using mouse-tracking algorithms. Parameters collected included detection accuracy, time taken, completeness of search coverage, revisits and search patterns used.

Results: Most common search patterns were Dental to Periphery (41.5%) and Periphery to Dental (37.7%). The mean accuracy score for all cases with pathology was 84.8%. Except for 2 cases with subtle findings (condylar fracture and fibrous dysplasia), mean accuracy scores ranged from 76.5% to 100%. There were no associations between search patterns and detection accuracy. Participants took longer durations and performed more complete searches with more revisits on "Normal" cases. They were more likely to use shorter search times with smaller coverage and perform single searches when correctly detecting lesions.

Conclusions: Experienced OMRs were able to detect lesions without scanning the entire PAN and within a single search, regardless of the search pattern used.

Advances in knowledge: This is the first study using mouse-tracking algorithms to evaluate visualization characteristics on PANs. Experienced OMRs can conduct efficient and accurate reviews of PANs regardless of search strategy.

口腔颌面放射科全景x线影像可视化的小鼠追踪研究。
目的:全景x线片(PANs)是一种常用的牙科成像方式,但评估起来很复杂。本研究旨在利用鼠标跟踪技术来识别口腔颌面放射学(OMR)教师在检查pan时的可视化特征,并评估其与检测准确性的关系。方法:招募了17名具有5 ~ 38年经验的美国牙科学校的OMR教员。研究人员向参与者展示了17张通过Zoom拍摄的画面(5张“正常”,12张“病态”),并指示他们随着眼球运动同步移动鼠标光标。数据收集基于视频记录,使用鼠标跟踪算法自动检测X, Y坐标。收集的参数包括检测精度、所用时间、搜索范围的完整性、重新访问和使用的搜索模式。结果:最常见的搜索模式是Dental to Periphery(41.5%)和peripheral to Dental(37.7%)。所有病理病例的平均准确率评分为84.6%。除了2例轻微发现(髁突骨折和纤维发育不良)外,平均准确率评分为76.5%至100%。搜索模式和检测准确率之间没有关联。参与者花了更长的时间,对“正常”案例进行了更多的访问,并进行了更完整的搜索。他们更有可能使用更短的搜索时间和更小的覆盖范围,并在正确检测病变时执行单一搜索。结论:经验丰富的omr能够在不扫描整个PAN的情况下检测病变,并且在一次搜索中,无论使用哪种搜索模式。知识进展:这是第一次使用鼠标跟踪算法来评估pan上的可视化模式。无论采用何种搜索策略,经验丰富的omr都可以对pan进行有效和准确的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书