Which is More Important to Enhance or Deteriorate Cognitive Functions in Older Adults With Major Cognitive Impairment: The Drug Burden Index or the Total Number of Medications?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000664
Kubra Altunkalem Seydi, Fatma Sena Dost, Derya Kaya, Eral Idil, Mehmet Selman Ontan, Esra Ates Bulut, Ahmet Turan Isik
{"title":"Which is More Important to Enhance or Deteriorate Cognitive Functions in Older Adults With Major Cognitive Impairment: The Drug Burden Index or the Total Number of Medications?","authors":"Kubra Altunkalem Seydi, Fatma Sena Dost, Derya Kaya, Eral Idil, Mehmet Selman Ontan, Esra Ates Bulut, Ahmet Turan Isik","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To prevent the adverse effects, deprescribing is a structured approach aimed at reducing anticholinergic burden and improving clinical outcomes, particularly in those with cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of alterations in the total number of medications and the Drug Burden Index (DBI) score on cognitive tests and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) scores during a 6-month follow-up period in older patients with major neurocognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 232 older patients with major neurocognitive impairment were enrolled in this study, which was retrospectively designed and followed up. The alterations in the total number of medications and the DBI scores were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the sixth month, which were compared with the changes in cognitive tests and ADL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing baseline and end-of-six-month Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores revealed a significant decrease in MMSE scores in patients with elevated DBI scores and those with increased medication intake ( P =0.001 and P =0.034, respectively). A subsequent comparison of the change in MMSE score across the groups revealed a significant decrease only among the group with decreased DBI score (Δ=0.45±3.29 and P <0.001). In the linear regression analysis, a 1-unit increase in DBI score and drug number was associated with a decrease in MMSE scores ( B : -0.245 vs. -0.197).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 6-month follow-up study demonstrated that deprescribing should prioritize the comprehensive evaluation of medication quantity and anticholinergic burden to enhance the efficacy of dementia care in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"50-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To prevent the adverse effects, deprescribing is a structured approach aimed at reducing anticholinergic burden and improving clinical outcomes, particularly in those with cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of alterations in the total number of medications and the Drug Burden Index (DBI) score on cognitive tests and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) scores during a 6-month follow-up period in older patients with major neurocognitive impairment.

Methods: A total of 232 older patients with major neurocognitive impairment were enrolled in this study, which was retrospectively designed and followed up. The alterations in the total number of medications and the DBI scores were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the sixth month, which were compared with the changes in cognitive tests and ADL scores.

Results: Comparing baseline and end-of-six-month Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores revealed a significant decrease in MMSE scores in patients with elevated DBI scores and those with increased medication intake ( P =0.001 and P =0.034, respectively). A subsequent comparison of the change in MMSE score across the groups revealed a significant decrease only among the group with decreased DBI score (Δ=0.45±3.29 and P <0.001). In the linear regression analysis, a 1-unit increase in DBI score and drug number was associated with a decrease in MMSE scores ( B : -0.245 vs. -0.197).

Conclusions: The 6-month follow-up study demonstrated that deprescribing should prioritize the comprehensive evaluation of medication quantity and anticholinergic burden to enhance the efficacy of dementia care in older adults.

药物负担指数和总用药数量,对重度认知障碍老年人认知功能的增强和恶化哪个更重要?
目的:为了预防不良反应,减处方是一种结构化的方法,旨在减少抗胆碱能负担和改善临床结果,特别是对那些有认知障碍的患者。本研究的目的是确定在6个月的随访期间,患有严重神经认知障碍的老年患者的药物总数和药物负担指数(DBI)评分对认知测试和日常生活活动(ADL)评分的影响。方法:对232例老年严重神经认知障碍患者进行回顾性设计和随访。在基线和第六个月结束时评估药物总数和DBI评分的变化,并将其与认知测试和ADL评分的变化进行比较。结果:比较基线和6个月后迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分显示,DBI评分升高的患者和药物摄入增加的患者MMSE评分显著降低(P=0.001和P=0.034)。随后比较各组MMSE评分的变化,发现只有DBI评分降低的组(Δ=0.45±3.29,p)显著降低。结论:6个月的随访研究表明,处方应优先综合评价用药量和抗胆碱能负担,以提高老年人痴呆护理的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书