Telemedicine Gatekeeping Over 15,000 Patients from Specialist Consultation Waiting Lists: A Cost-Minimization Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2025-10-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26924366251388854
Juliana Nunes Pfeil, Rudi Roman, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Rados, Roberto Nunes Umpierre, Matheus Grassi de Oliveira, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Rodolfo Souza da Silva, Natan Katz, Rita Mattiello, Erno Harzheim
{"title":"Telemedicine Gatekeeping Over 15,000 Patients from Specialist Consultation Waiting Lists: A Cost-Minimization Study.","authors":"Juliana Nunes Pfeil, Rudi Roman, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Rados, Roberto Nunes Umpierre, Matheus Grassi de Oliveira, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Rodolfo Souza da Silva, Natan Katz, Rita Mattiello, Erno Harzheim","doi":"10.1177/26924366251388854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assesses the cost-minimization of the RegulaSUS telemedicine program, reducing the necessity for face-to-face specialist consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cost analysis study, utilizing a retrospective cohort design, was conducted from January 2017 to December 2019. The gatekeeping process for waiting lists for specialized consultations was performed by two groups: the RegulaSUS program through telemedicine intervention and those regulated by the usual procedures of the Ambulatory Regulation Center of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (the contemporaneous controls group). The primary outcome was to evaluate the financial impact of the RegulaSUS program on the health system costs using the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RegulaSUS program substantially reduced health care and societal expenditures, with gatekeeping by telemedicine costing $85.02 versus $214.45 for usual procedures-a 60% reduction. This intervention resulted in societal savings of R$7,833,882.56 over 36 months by successfully managing 15,064 patients within primary care settings, rather than referring them to specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RegulaSUS program demonstrates a remarkable economic impact by integrating evidence-based gatekeeping protocols with telemedicine infrastructure, effectively decreasing specialist demand. This intervention provides compelling evidence for the potential of telemedicine to optimize health care resource allocation, enhance care coordination, and improve system efficiency. The outcomes present a scalable, financially sustainable model for health system strengthening that merits consideration for broader implementation across Brazil's public health network and adaptation to comparable global health care contexts facing similar resource constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"363-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12670659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26924366251388854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assesses the cost-minimization of the RegulaSUS telemedicine program, reducing the necessity for face-to-face specialist consultations.

Methods: A cost analysis study, utilizing a retrospective cohort design, was conducted from January 2017 to December 2019. The gatekeeping process for waiting lists for specialized consultations was performed by two groups: the RegulaSUS program through telemedicine intervention and those regulated by the usual procedures of the Ambulatory Regulation Center of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (the contemporaneous controls group). The primary outcome was to evaluate the financial impact of the RegulaSUS program on the health system costs using the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) method.

Results: The RegulaSUS program substantially reduced health care and societal expenditures, with gatekeeping by telemedicine costing $85.02 versus $214.45 for usual procedures-a 60% reduction. This intervention resulted in societal savings of R$7,833,882.56 over 36 months by successfully managing 15,064 patients within primary care settings, rather than referring them to specialists.

Conclusions: The RegulaSUS program demonstrates a remarkable economic impact by integrating evidence-based gatekeeping protocols with telemedicine infrastructure, effectively decreasing specialist demand. This intervention provides compelling evidence for the potential of telemedicine to optimize health care resource allocation, enhance care coordination, and improve system efficiency. The outcomes present a scalable, financially sustainable model for health system strengthening that merits consideration for broader implementation across Brazil's public health network and adaptation to comparable global health care contexts facing similar resource constraints.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

远程医疗把关超过15000名患者从专家咨询等候名单:成本最小化研究。
目的:本研究评估常规远程医疗项目的成本最小化,减少面对面专家咨询的必要性。方法:采用回顾性队列设计,于2017年1月至2019年12月进行成本分析研究。专门会诊等候名单的守门过程由两组执行:通过远程医疗干预的RegulaSUS计划和由南巴西格兰德州门诊管理中心的常规程序管理的小组(同期对照组)。主要结果是使用时间驱动的基于活动的成本(TDABC)方法评估常规项目对卫生系统成本的财务影响。结果:RegulaSUS项目大大减少了医疗保健和社会支出,远程医疗的把关费用为85.02美元,而常规程序为214.45美元,减少了60%。通过在初级保健机构成功管理15,064名患者,而不是将他们转介给专家,这一干预措施在36个月内为社会节省了7,833,882.56雷亚尔。结论:RegulaSUS项目通过将循证把关协议与远程医疗基础设施相结合,有效地减少了专家需求,展示了显著的经济影响。这一干预措施为远程医疗优化卫生保健资源配置、加强护理协调和提高系统效率的潜力提供了令人信服的证据。研究结果为加强卫生系统提供了一个可扩展的、财政上可持续的模式,值得考虑在巴西公共卫生网络中更广泛地实施,并适应面临类似资源限制的类似全球卫生保健环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书