Epidemiology in dialogues: belonging to the Collective Health field, practices and theoretical tensions.

IF 2
Rita Barradas Barata
{"title":"Epidemiology in dialogues: belonging to the Collective Health field, practices and theoretical tensions.","authors":"Rita Barradas Barata","doi":"10.1590/1980-549720250002.supl.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this essay, we discuss the belonging of Epidemiology to the Collective Health field, theories and contributions of Epidemiology to the health work process and to the impact assessment of Collective Health programs and actions, and the practical and theoretical tensions in the discipline and in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The essay was conducted based on the theoretical contributions of various authors who reflected on Epidemiology throughout the 20th and early 21st centuries as well as the author's own experiences. It is organized into four thematic sections: the discipline's role within the field of Collective Health; the relations between Epidemiology and health practices; practical and theoretical tensions within the discipline itself and other disciplines within the field; and reflections on possible dialogues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We suggest resorting to transdisciplinarity, understanding the dynamics of scientific fields, overcoming false hierarchies between types of knowledge, defeating disciplinary limits, and decentralizing network connections as ways of coping with and overcoming difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reward for this effort lies in the possibility of achieving effective responses to complex issues that, in addition to improving the health situation of populations, can be guided by the moral imperative of reducing inequalities and social injustices, respecting human rights, and building a more supportive and healthy society.</p>","PeriodicalId":74697,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","volume":"28 suppl 1","pages":"e250002supl1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12667505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720250002.supl.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this essay, we discuss the belonging of Epidemiology to the Collective Health field, theories and contributions of Epidemiology to the health work process and to the impact assessment of Collective Health programs and actions, and the practical and theoretical tensions in the discipline and in the field.

Methods: The essay was conducted based on the theoretical contributions of various authors who reflected on Epidemiology throughout the 20th and early 21st centuries as well as the author's own experiences. It is organized into four thematic sections: the discipline's role within the field of Collective Health; the relations between Epidemiology and health practices; practical and theoretical tensions within the discipline itself and other disciplines within the field; and reflections on possible dialogues.

Results: We suggest resorting to transdisciplinarity, understanding the dynamics of scientific fields, overcoming false hierarchies between types of knowledge, defeating disciplinary limits, and decentralizing network connections as ways of coping with and overcoming difficulties.

Conclusions: The reward for this effort lies in the possibility of achieving effective responses to complex issues that, in addition to improving the health situation of populations, can be guided by the moral imperative of reducing inequalities and social injustices, respecting human rights, and building a more supportive and healthy society.

对话中的流行病学:属于集体卫生领域、实践与理论的紧张关系。
目的:在本文中,我们讨论流行病学在集体卫生领域的归属,流行病学对卫生工作过程和集体卫生计划和行动的影响评估的理论和贡献,以及该学科和该领域的实践和理论紧张关系。方法:本文以20世纪和21世纪初各作者对流行病学的理论反思为基础,结合作者自身的经验进行研究。它分为四个主题部分:该学科在集体卫生领域的作用;流行病学与卫生实践的关系;学科本身和领域内其他学科的实践和理论紧张;以及对可能对话的思考。结果:我们建议将跨学科、理解科学领域的动态、克服知识类型之间的错误等级、突破学科限制和分散网络连接作为应对和克服困难的方法。结论:这一努力的回报在于有可能对复杂问题作出有效反应,这些问题除了改善人口的健康状况外,还可以遵循减少不平等和社会不公正、尊重人权和建立一个更具支持性和健康的社会的道德要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书