Enhancing Recruitment Using Teleconference and Commitment Contract (ERUTECC): a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial within the EFFECTS trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Upsala journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2025-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.48101/ujms.v130.12897
Eva Isaksson, Per Näsman, Per Wester, Ann Charlotte Laska, Erik Lundström
{"title":"Enhancing Recruitment Using Teleconference and Commitment Contract (ERUTECC): a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial within the EFFECTS trial.","authors":"Eva Isaksson, Per Näsman, Per Wester, Ann Charlotte Laska, Erik Lundström","doi":"10.48101/ujms.v130.12897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two out of three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) fail to meet their recruitment goals. Recruitment to Efficacy oF Fluoxetine - a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS), fluoxetine for stroke recovery was slower than anticipated. We aimed to evaluate an intervention to improve recruitment to EFFECTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This stepped wedge, cluster randomised study investigated whether a teleconference with the study personnel and the head of department could enhance recruitment in the ongoing EFFECTS. We included 20 low- and medium recruiting active centres. We excluded high recruiting centres. All centres started as controls and were followed by 60 days of observation. We used block randomisation. The primary outcome was a 20% increase of recruitment within 60 days post intervention compared within 60 days pre intervention. Secondary outcomes were comparing recruitment between different types of centres, that is small versus large or experienced versus non-experienced centres, and university versus non-university hospitals. In exploratory analyses, recruitment within 30 days post versus 30 days pre intervention was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recruitment increased by 10% at 60 days. We noticed a short-lived increase of 23% the first month. The increased recruitment was most pronounced in low-recruiting, small and non-university hospitals. The recruitment of patients increased after the first contact with the centres where we announced that there would be a conference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A teleconference with the study personnel and the head of department increased the recruitment by 23% within 30 days and by 10%, 60 days post intervention in this embedded RCT. This implies that this structured intervention aimed at increased recruitment was short-lived and would need frequent repetitions in order to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":"130 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v130.12897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two out of three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) fail to meet their recruitment goals. Recruitment to Efficacy oF Fluoxetine - a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS), fluoxetine for stroke recovery was slower than anticipated. We aimed to evaluate an intervention to improve recruitment to EFFECTS.

Methods: This stepped wedge, cluster randomised study investigated whether a teleconference with the study personnel and the head of department could enhance recruitment in the ongoing EFFECTS. We included 20 low- and medium recruiting active centres. We excluded high recruiting centres. All centres started as controls and were followed by 60 days of observation. We used block randomisation. The primary outcome was a 20% increase of recruitment within 60 days post intervention compared within 60 days pre intervention. Secondary outcomes were comparing recruitment between different types of centres, that is small versus large or experienced versus non-experienced centres, and university versus non-university hospitals. In exploratory analyses, recruitment within 30 days post versus 30 days pre intervention was compared.

Results: The recruitment increased by 10% at 60 days. We noticed a short-lived increase of 23% the first month. The increased recruitment was most pronounced in low-recruiting, small and non-university hospitals. The recruitment of patients increased after the first contact with the centres where we announced that there would be a conference.

Conclusion: A teleconference with the study personnel and the head of department increased the recruitment by 23% within 30 days and by 10%, 60 days post intervention in this embedded RCT. This implies that this structured intervention aimed at increased recruitment was short-lived and would need frequent repetitions in order to be effective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用电话会议和承诺合同(ERUTECC)加强招聘:效应试验中的阶梯楔形随机分组试验。
背景:三分之二的随机对照试验(rct)未能达到招募目标。对氟西汀疗效的招募——一项卒中随机对照试验(EFFECTS),氟西汀对卒中恢复的作用比预期的要慢。我们的目的是评估一种干预措施,以提高招募效果。方法:这是一项阶梯楔形、整群随机研究,调查了与研究人员和部门负责人进行电话会议是否可以提高正在进行的效果。我们纳入了20个中小型招聘活跃中心。我们排除了高招聘中心。所有中心开始作为对照,随后进行60天的观察。我们使用了分组随机化。主要结果是干预后60天招募人数比干预前60天增加20%。次要结果是比较不同类型中心之间的招聘情况,即小型与大型或有经验的与无经验的中心,以及大学与非大学医院。在探索性分析中,比较了干预后30天与干预前30天的招募情况。结果:60天招募率增加10%。我们注意到第一个月出现了23%的短期增长。招聘人数增加在低招聘人数、小型和非大学医院最为明显。在与我们宣布将召开会议的中心进行第一次接触后,招募的患者增加了。结论:在本嵌入RCT中,与研究人员和科室负责人进行电话会议可在干预后30天内增加23%的招聘人数,在干预后60天内增加10%的招聘人数。这意味着这种旨在增加征聘的有组织的干预是短暂的,需要经常重复才能有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书