Current guidelines and future directions in comprehensive obesity assessment.

IF 3.4 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Korean Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.4082/kjfm.25.0275
Sinyoung Cho, Hyuktae Kwon
{"title":"Current guidelines and future directions in comprehensive obesity assessment.","authors":"Sinyoung Cho, Hyuktae Kwon","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.25.0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is a chronic systemic disease with multifactorial causes that poses a substantial health and economic burden worldwide. In Korea, obesity is a significant public health concern owing to the increasing prevalence of obesity-related comorbidities and mortality. Obesity is defined as excess adiposity that poses health risks. Adiposity can be assessed using direct and indirect methods, among which body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used anthropometric measurement in epidemiological studies and clinical practice. However, limitations of BMI-centric obesity assessments have been noted in previous studies. Simple adiposity measures cannot capture obesity-related medical conditions, daily functional status, or mental health. Therefore, medical associations worldwide have increasingly emphasized the need for comprehensive obesity assessments, including the 2020 Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guidelines, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology 2023 Guidelines, 2024 European Association for the Study of Obesity diagnostic framework, and 2025 Lancet Commission's Clinical Obesity Diagnostic Criteria. Recent perspectives have emphasized multidimensional approaches to obesity assessment to capture individuals' overall health status. This review aims to evaluate the limitations of BMI-centric obesity diagnosis, summarize emerging recommendations from recent international guidelines, and highlight potential alternative approaches for improving the assessment of obesity and related health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"4-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.25.0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic systemic disease with multifactorial causes that poses a substantial health and economic burden worldwide. In Korea, obesity is a significant public health concern owing to the increasing prevalence of obesity-related comorbidities and mortality. Obesity is defined as excess adiposity that poses health risks. Adiposity can be assessed using direct and indirect methods, among which body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used anthropometric measurement in epidemiological studies and clinical practice. However, limitations of BMI-centric obesity assessments have been noted in previous studies. Simple adiposity measures cannot capture obesity-related medical conditions, daily functional status, or mental health. Therefore, medical associations worldwide have increasingly emphasized the need for comprehensive obesity assessments, including the 2020 Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guidelines, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology 2023 Guidelines, 2024 European Association for the Study of Obesity diagnostic framework, and 2025 Lancet Commission's Clinical Obesity Diagnostic Criteria. Recent perspectives have emphasized multidimensional approaches to obesity assessment to capture individuals' overall health status. This review aims to evaluate the limitations of BMI-centric obesity diagnosis, summarize emerging recommendations from recent international guidelines, and highlight potential alternative approaches for improving the assessment of obesity and related health outcomes.

肥胖症综合评估的现行指南和未来发展方向。
肥胖是一种具有多因素病因的慢性全身性疾病,在世界范围内造成严重的健康和经济负担。在韩国,肥胖是一个重大的公共卫生问题,因为与肥胖相关的合并症和死亡率日益普遍。肥胖被定义为造成健康风险的过度肥胖。肥胖的评估有直接和间接两种方法,其中体重指数(body mass index, BMI)是流行病学研究和临床实践中应用最广泛的人体测量方法。然而,先前的研究已经注意到以bmi为中心的肥胖评估的局限性。简单的肥胖测量无法捕捉到与肥胖相关的医疗状况、日常功能状态或心理健康状况。因此,世界各地的医学协会越来越强调对肥胖进行全面评估的必要性,包括2020年加拿大成人肥胖临床实践指南、美国临床内分泌学家协会/美国内分泌学会2023指南、2024年欧洲肥胖诊断框架研究协会和2025年柳叶刀委员会的临床肥胖诊断标准。最近的观点强调了肥胖评估的多维方法,以捕捉个人的整体健康状况。本综述旨在评估以bmi为中心的肥胖诊断的局限性,总结最近国际指南的新建议,并强调改善肥胖和相关健康结果评估的潜在替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书