Association between a remimazolam-propofol combination for maintenance of anesthesia and extubation time: a propensity score analysis.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Takayuki Katsuragawa, Soichiro Mimuro, Hiroki Anezaki, Yuji Suzuki, Tsunehisa Sato, Yoshitaka Aoki, Masakazu Yamaguchi, Yoshiki Nakajima
{"title":"Association between a remimazolam-propofol combination for maintenance of anesthesia and extubation time: a propensity score analysis.","authors":"Takayuki Katsuragawa, Soichiro Mimuro, Hiroki Anezaki, Yuji Suzuki, Tsunehisa Sato, Yoshitaka Aoki, Masakazu Yamaguchi, Yoshiki Nakajima","doi":"10.1186/s40981-025-00836-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of combined administration of remimazolam and propofol on extubation time during anesthesia maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at Hamamatsu University Hospital, enrolling adult patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery between September 2020 and October 2024. Eligible patients underwent invasive arterial pressure monitoring and anesthesia maintenance with remimazolam alone (RB group), propofol alone (PROP group), or a combination of both (RB + PROP group). Extubation time was defined as the interval between the cessation of sedative administration and tracheal extubation. Propensity score matching was performed after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, preoperative comorbidities, type of surgery, combined with epidural anesthesia, scheduled or emergency surgery, operation time, and blood loss. The primary endpoint was the extubation time, while the secondary endpoints included the severity of hypotension, assessed by the time-weighted average area under the threshold, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 165, 403, and 178 patients in the RB, PROP, and RB + PROP groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 75 matched cohorts were analyzed. Among the three groups, significant differences were found in terms of extubation time and hypotension (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively), whereas the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not significantly differ (p = 0.23). In multiple comparisons, the RB group (9.0 min) and the RB + PROP group (9.0 min) had significantly shorter extubation times than the PROP group (13.0 min) (each p < 0.001). Time-weighted average area under the threshold was significantly lower in the RB group (0.74 mmHg) than in the PROP group (2.03 mmHg) (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extubation time with combined remimazolam and propofol was comparable to that with remimazolam alone, and both were shorter than that with propofol alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14635,"journal":{"name":"JA Clinical Reports","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JA Clinical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-025-00836-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of combined administration of remimazolam and propofol on extubation time during anesthesia maintenance.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Hamamatsu University Hospital, enrolling adult patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery between September 2020 and October 2024. Eligible patients underwent invasive arterial pressure monitoring and anesthesia maintenance with remimazolam alone (RB group), propofol alone (PROP group), or a combination of both (RB + PROP group). Extubation time was defined as the interval between the cessation of sedative administration and tracheal extubation. Propensity score matching was performed after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, preoperative comorbidities, type of surgery, combined with epidural anesthesia, scheduled or emergency surgery, operation time, and blood loss. The primary endpoint was the extubation time, while the secondary endpoints included the severity of hypotension, assessed by the time-weighted average area under the threshold, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Results: The study included 165, 403, and 178 patients in the RB, PROP, and RB + PROP groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 75 matched cohorts were analyzed. Among the three groups, significant differences were found in terms of extubation time and hypotension (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively), whereas the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not significantly differ (p = 0.23). In multiple comparisons, the RB group (9.0 min) and the RB + PROP group (9.0 min) had significantly shorter extubation times than the PROP group (13.0 min) (each p < 0.001). Time-weighted average area under the threshold was significantly lower in the RB group (0.74 mmHg) than in the PROP group (2.03 mmHg) (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Extubation time with combined remimazolam and propofol was comparable to that with remimazolam alone, and both were shorter than that with propofol alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雷马唑仑-异丙酚联合用药维持麻醉与拔管时间的关系:倾向评分分析。
背景:本研究旨在评价雷马唑仑与异丙酚联合给药对麻醉维持期间拔管时间的影响。方法:本回顾性研究在滨松大学医院进行,纳入了2020年9月至2024年10月期间接受非心脏手术的成年患者。符合条件的患者接受有创动脉压监测和麻醉维持,分别使用雷马唑仑(RB组)、丙泊酚(PROP组)或两者联合(RB + PROP组)。拔管时间定义为停止镇静给药至气管拔管的时间间隔。在调整年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况、术前合并症、手术类型、联合硬膜外麻醉、计划或紧急手术、手术时间和出血量后进行倾向评分匹配。主要终点是拔管时间,次要终点包括低血压的严重程度,通过阈值下的时间加权平均面积来评估,以及术后恶心和呕吐的发生率。结果:本研究分别纳入RB、PROP和RB + PROP组165例、403例和178例患者。倾向评分匹配后,对75个匹配的队列进行分析。结论:雷马唑仑联合异丙酚拔管时间与单独雷马唑仑拔管时间相当,且均短于单独异丙酚拔管时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JA Clinical Reports
JA Clinical Reports ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: JA Clinical Reports is a companion journal to the Journal of Anesthesia (JA), the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). This journal is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal related to clinical anesthesia practices such as anesthesia management, pain management and intensive care. Case reports are very important articles from the viewpoint of education and the cultivation of scientific thinking in the field of anesthesia. However, submissions of anesthesia research and clinical reports from Japan are notably decreasing in major anesthesia journals. Therefore, the JSA has decided to launch a new journal, JA Clinical Reports, to encourage JSA members, particularly junior Japanese anesthesiologists, to publish papers in English language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书