Psychedelics: The pathway to implementation in the European healthcare systems

IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Neuropsychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.11.007
Gerhard Gründer , Lea J. Mertens , Moritz Spangemacher , Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg , Henrik Jungaberle
{"title":"Psychedelics: The pathway to implementation in the European healthcare systems","authors":"Gerhard Gründer ,&nbsp;Lea J. Mertens ,&nbsp;Moritz Spangemacher ,&nbsp;Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg ,&nbsp;Henrik Jungaberle","doi":"10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of psychedelic therapies into European healthcare is a nuanced process that involves not only obtaining European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval but also successfully navigating Health Technology Assessment (HTA) evaluations across member states. After EMA approval, which focuses on the safety, efficacy, and quality of the therapeutic, HTA agencies assess these therapies for their “added therapeutic value,” considering factors like cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, and overall societal impact. Each country's HTA, including the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Germany’s Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), and France’s Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), plays a pivotal role in determining reimbursement and access to these treatments. An added challenge is that HTA bodies in Europe often require active comparator studies rather than just placebo controls to establish a treatment’s advantage over existing standard of care – a particular hurdle for psychedelic-assisted therapies, where controlled trials against active comparators are almost completely lacking. Furthermore, psychedelics are typically integrated with psychotherapy, adding complexity to HTA evaluations, as few frameworks currently assess the value of combination therapies within healthcare systems. Creating a standardized HTA approach or a unified European guideline for such novel treatments could promote equitable access across countries, helping to overcome the discrepancies in market access and patient reach across Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12049,"journal":{"name":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"102 ","pages":"Pages 41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924977X25007862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of psychedelic therapies into European healthcare is a nuanced process that involves not only obtaining European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval but also successfully navigating Health Technology Assessment (HTA) evaluations across member states. After EMA approval, which focuses on the safety, efficacy, and quality of the therapeutic, HTA agencies assess these therapies for their “added therapeutic value,” considering factors like cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, and overall societal impact. Each country's HTA, including the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Germany’s Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), and France’s Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), plays a pivotal role in determining reimbursement and access to these treatments. An added challenge is that HTA bodies in Europe often require active comparator studies rather than just placebo controls to establish a treatment’s advantage over existing standard of care – a particular hurdle for psychedelic-assisted therapies, where controlled trials against active comparators are almost completely lacking. Furthermore, psychedelics are typically integrated with psychotherapy, adding complexity to HTA evaluations, as few frameworks currently assess the value of combination therapies within healthcare systems. Creating a standardized HTA approach or a unified European guideline for such novel treatments could promote equitable access across countries, helping to overcome the discrepancies in market access and patient reach across Europe.
致幻剂:在欧洲医疗保健系统实施的途径。
将迷幻疗法整合到欧洲医疗保健中是一个微妙的过程,不仅需要获得欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的批准,还需要成功地通过成员国的健康技术评估(HTA)评估。在EMA批准后,主要关注治疗的安全性、有效性和质量,HTA机构评估这些治疗的“附加治疗价值”,考虑成本效益、临床结果和整体社会影响等因素。每个国家的HTA,包括英国的国家卫生和护理卓越研究所(NICE)、德国的卫生保健质量和效率研究所(IQWiG)和法国的高级医疗机构(HAS),在决定这些治疗的报销和获得方面发挥着关键作用。一个额外的挑战是,欧洲的HTA机构经常需要主动比较研究,而不仅仅是安慰剂对照,以确定一种治疗方法比现有的标准治疗方法更有优势——这对迷幻剂辅助治疗来说是一个特别的障碍,在这种治疗中,几乎完全缺乏针对主动比较的对照试验。此外,致幻剂通常与心理治疗相结合,增加了HTA评估的复杂性,因为目前很少有框架评估医疗保健系统中联合治疗的价值。为这种新疗法制定标准化的HTA方法或统一的欧洲指南可以促进各国之间的公平获取,帮助克服欧洲各地市场准入和患者覆盖范围的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Neuropsychopharmacology
European Neuropsychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
730
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: European Neuropsychopharmacology is the official publication of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP). In accordance with the mission of the College, the journal focuses on clinical and basic science contributions that advance our understanding of brain function and human behaviour and enable translation into improved treatments and enhanced public health impact in psychiatry. Recent years have been characterized by exciting advances in basic knowledge and available experimental techniques in neuroscience and genomics. However, clinical translation of these findings has not been as rapid. The journal aims to narrow this gap by promoting findings that are expected to have a major impact on both our understanding of the biological bases of mental disorders and the development and improvement of treatments, ideally paving the way for prevention and recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书