Radiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer in the United Kingdom: Patterns of Practice and Quality Indicators

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2025.103978
C.W. Bleaney , K. Aitken , T.D.L. Crosby , G. Radhakrishna , R. Roy , K. Spencer , C.M. Jones
{"title":"Radiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer in the United Kingdom: Patterns of Practice and Quality Indicators","authors":"C.W. Bleaney ,&nbsp;K. Aitken ,&nbsp;T.D.L. Crosby ,&nbsp;G. Radhakrishna ,&nbsp;R. Roy ,&nbsp;K. Spencer ,&nbsp;C.M. Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>There is limited guidance relating to the provision of radiotherapy for patients with oesophageal cancer. Given this, we sought to assess variation in patterns of care in the UK and to devise quality improvement metrics to support future treatment standardisation.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We undertook a cross-sectional survey using a bespoke online survey to explore geographical variation in radiotherapy use for oesophageal cancer across the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS). These data were combined with an observational registry analysis using the National Disease Registration Service Radiotherapy Dataset to explore temporal variation in radiotherapy utilization from January 2020 – June 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey responses were received from 75% (n = 45/60) of UK centres. These demonstrate considerable variation in the interpretation of radiotherapy indications, particularly in the non-curative setting, as well as in radiotherapy technique; with, for instance, one third (n = 15/45) of centres reporting that they do not use motion management strategies for lower third or junctional tumours. Induction chemotherapy use differs between centres and by concurrent regimen, with 93–96% (n = 42–43/45) of centres using induction treatment prior to concurrent platinum/fluoropyrimidine and 56–62% (n = 25–28/45) using it prior to concurrent platinum/taxane. Post-treatment surveillance and follow-up measures also differed with little evidence for more intensive surveillance in patients fit for salvage resection. Most centres reported the use of intensity modulated or volumetric arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT) for radical plans, which was supported by NDRS data demonstrating that the median proportion of patients in each centre treated using IMRT/VMAT increased from 60% (range 14.3–100%) in January-June 2020 to 91.7% (range 16.7–100%) in January-June 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is substantial variation in the radiotherapy-based care of patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK. Formal national guidance is required to build on the quality metrics outlined here.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 103978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093665552500233X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

There is limited guidance relating to the provision of radiotherapy for patients with oesophageal cancer. Given this, we sought to assess variation in patterns of care in the UK and to devise quality improvement metrics to support future treatment standardisation.

Materials and Methods

We undertook a cross-sectional survey using a bespoke online survey to explore geographical variation in radiotherapy use for oesophageal cancer across the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS). These data were combined with an observational registry analysis using the National Disease Registration Service Radiotherapy Dataset to explore temporal variation in radiotherapy utilization from January 2020 – June 2024.

Results

Survey responses were received from 75% (n = 45/60) of UK centres. These demonstrate considerable variation in the interpretation of radiotherapy indications, particularly in the non-curative setting, as well as in radiotherapy technique; with, for instance, one third (n = 15/45) of centres reporting that they do not use motion management strategies for lower third or junctional tumours. Induction chemotherapy use differs between centres and by concurrent regimen, with 93–96% (n = 42–43/45) of centres using induction treatment prior to concurrent platinum/fluoropyrimidine and 56–62% (n = 25–28/45) using it prior to concurrent platinum/taxane. Post-treatment surveillance and follow-up measures also differed with little evidence for more intensive surveillance in patients fit for salvage resection. Most centres reported the use of intensity modulated or volumetric arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT) for radical plans, which was supported by NDRS data demonstrating that the median proportion of patients in each centre treated using IMRT/VMAT increased from 60% (range 14.3–100%) in January-June 2020 to 91.7% (range 16.7–100%) in January-June 2024.

Conclusions

There is substantial variation in the radiotherapy-based care of patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK. Formal national guidance is required to build on the quality metrics outlined here.
英国食管癌放疗:实践模式和质量指标。
目的:有关食管癌患者放疗的指导是有限的。鉴于此,我们试图评估英国护理模式的变化,并设计质量改进指标,以支持未来的治疗标准化。材料和方法:我们采用一项定制的在线调查进行了一项横断面调查,以探索英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)食管癌放疗使用的地理差异。这些数据与使用国家疾病登记服务放射治疗数据集的观察性登记分析相结合,以探索2020年1月至2024年6月放射治疗利用的时间变化。结果:75% (n = 45/60)的英国中心收到了调查回复。这表明对放疗适应症的解释存在相当大的差异,特别是在非治疗性环境中,以及在放疗技术方面;例如,三分之一(n = 15/45)的中心报告说,他们不使用运动管理策略治疗下三分之一或结膜肿瘤。诱导化疗的使用在不同的中心和不同的并行方案之间有所不同,93-96% (n = 42-43/45)的中心在铂/氟嘧啶并行治疗之前使用诱导治疗,56-62% (n = 25-28/45)的中心在铂/紫杉烷并行治疗之前使用诱导治疗。治疗后监测和随访措施也存在差异,几乎没有证据表明适合进行补救性切除的患者需要更强化的监测。大多数中心报告使用强度调节或体积弧治疗(IMRT/VMAT)进行根治性计划,NDRS数据支持这一点,表明每个中心使用IMRT/VMAT治疗的患者中位数比例从2020年1月至6月的60%(范围14.3-100%)增加到2024年1月至6月的91.7%(范围16.7-100%)。结论:在英国,食管癌患者的放疗护理存在很大差异。需要正式的国家指导,以这里概述的质量指标为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书