Mending fences: Relationship quality, not reproductive cycle, predicts reconciliation in Amiata jennies

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Applied Animal Behaviour Science Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106885
Alice Galotti , Viviana Forti , Alessandra Rota , Paolo Baragli , Elisabetta Palagi
{"title":"Mending fences: Relationship quality, not reproductive cycle, predicts reconciliation in Amiata jennies","authors":"Alice Galotti ,&nbsp;Viviana Forti ,&nbsp;Alessandra Rota ,&nbsp;Paolo Baragli ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Palagi","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on reconciliation has mainly focused on primates, leaving domestic ungulates largely unexplored. To address this gap, we investigated female–female agonistic and post-conflict dynamics in a stable group of jennies (<em>Equus asinus</em>), integrating behavioral observations with a physiologically validated reproductive parameter. During estrus, females showed increased proximity, suggesting that reproductive cycle promotes tolerance and spatial cohesion. Closer spacing did not lead to more overt aggression, but was associated with a rise in subtle threats, likely functioning as a low-cost strategy to regulate tension while avoiding escalation. Here, we also reported reconciliation in our group of jennies, consistent with findings in horses, a species phylogenetically close to donkeys. Most conciliatory contacts occurred within seconds after aggression and were more frequent between closely bonded partners, supporting the <em>Valuable Relationship Hypothesis</em>. Victims were more likely to initiate post-conflict contacts with close affiliates and aggressors of similar rank, indicating a balance between preserving valuable ties and minimizing risk. Reconciliation was also more likely after high-intensity aggression, suggesting its key role in rapidly repairing relationships when social costs are highest. Contrary to our predictions, the reproductive cycle did not influence post-conflict behavior. The absence of a resident male in the group likely reduced reproductive competition among females, which may explain this result. By integrating physiological and behavioral approaches, this study not only provides the first systematic evidence of reconciliation in donkeys but also demonstrates that subtle social dynamics in female-only groups can be rigorously quantified. Extending conflict management research beyond primates to domestic ungulates reveals mechanisms that are both evolutionarily informative and directly relevant to husbandry, offering novel insights into how social cohesion and welfare can be maintained in managed populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"295 ","pages":"Article 106885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125003843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on reconciliation has mainly focused on primates, leaving domestic ungulates largely unexplored. To address this gap, we investigated female–female agonistic and post-conflict dynamics in a stable group of jennies (Equus asinus), integrating behavioral observations with a physiologically validated reproductive parameter. During estrus, females showed increased proximity, suggesting that reproductive cycle promotes tolerance and spatial cohesion. Closer spacing did not lead to more overt aggression, but was associated with a rise in subtle threats, likely functioning as a low-cost strategy to regulate tension while avoiding escalation. Here, we also reported reconciliation in our group of jennies, consistent with findings in horses, a species phylogenetically close to donkeys. Most conciliatory contacts occurred within seconds after aggression and were more frequent between closely bonded partners, supporting the Valuable Relationship Hypothesis. Victims were more likely to initiate post-conflict contacts with close affiliates and aggressors of similar rank, indicating a balance between preserving valuable ties and minimizing risk. Reconciliation was also more likely after high-intensity aggression, suggesting its key role in rapidly repairing relationships when social costs are highest. Contrary to our predictions, the reproductive cycle did not influence post-conflict behavior. The absence of a resident male in the group likely reduced reproductive competition among females, which may explain this result. By integrating physiological and behavioral approaches, this study not only provides the first systematic evidence of reconciliation in donkeys but also demonstrates that subtle social dynamics in female-only groups can be rigorously quantified. Extending conflict management research beyond primates to domestic ungulates reveals mechanisms that are both evolutionarily informative and directly relevant to husbandry, offering novel insights into how social cohesion and welfare can be maintained in managed populations.
修补篱笆:关系质量,而不是生育周期,预示着Amiata珍妮的和解
关于和解的研究主要集中在灵长类动物身上,而对家养有蹄类动物的研究基本上是未知的。为了解决这一差距,我们研究了一群稳定的珍妮马(Equus asinus)的雌性-雌性激动和冲突后动态,将行为观察与生理验证的生殖参数相结合。在发情期,雌性的接近性增加,表明生殖周期促进了容忍和空间凝聚力。更近的间隔并不会导致更多的公开攻击,但与微妙威胁的增加有关,可能是一种低成本的策略,可以调节紧张情绪,同时避免升级。在这里,我们也报告了我们的珍妮组的和解,与马的发现一致,马是一个在系统发育上接近驴的物种。大多数和解接触发生在攻击后的几秒钟内,而且在关系密切的伴侣之间更频繁,这支持了“有价值关系假说”。受害者更有可能在冲突后与亲密的附属机构和类似级别的侵略者进行接触,这表明在保持有价值的关系和尽量减少风险之间取得了平衡。在高强度的攻击之后,和解也更有可能发生,这表明在社会成本最高的情况下,和解在快速修复关系方面发挥了关键作用。与我们的预测相反,生殖周期并不影响冲突后的行为。群体中没有常驻的雄性可能会减少雌性之间的生殖竞争,这可能解释了这一结果。通过整合生理学和行为学的方法,这项研究不仅提供了驴子和解的第一个系统证据,而且还表明,在只有雌性的群体中,微妙的社会动态可以严格量化。将冲突管理研究从灵长类动物扩展到家养有蹄类动物,揭示了既具有进化信息又与畜牧业直接相关的机制,为如何在管理种群中维持社会凝聚力和福利提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书