Immunitary Life in COVID-19 Times: Understandings, Practices and Experiences Among Members of Marginalised Social Groups.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deborah Lupton, Kerryn Drysdale
{"title":"Immunitary Life in COVID-19 Times: Understandings, Practices and Experiences Among Members of Marginalised Social Groups.","authors":"Deborah Lupton, Kerryn Drysdale","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the concepts of human immunity and immune responsiveness have received new attention. This article reports findings from a project that interviewed members of four marginalised subgroups of the Australian population with experience of blood-borne viruses, other chronic health conditions and social stigma about how they understand their immunity and in what practices they have engaged to strengthen their immune responsiveness since the outbreak of COVID. In participants' accounts, there were echoes of long-held concepts about immunity as self-defence against invasion and personal responsibility for strong immune responsiveness. However, these ideas were combined with less adversarial concepts referring to the importance of friendly collaboration with one's immune system, as well as the role of collective responses in strengthening individuals' immunity. Participants also acknowledged the influence of external factors beyond their control that affected their immunity. They were strongly supportive of COVID vaccines but also recognised that they were just one part of a 'package' of immunitarian behaviours and health factors required to protect themselves and others. This study, therefore, contributes to a more inclusive conceptualisation of immunity-related biopolitics that acknowledges the sociocultural and material conditions in which immunities extend beyond the atomised individual body.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"48 1","pages":"e70125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the concepts of human immunity and immune responsiveness have received new attention. This article reports findings from a project that interviewed members of four marginalised subgroups of the Australian population with experience of blood-borne viruses, other chronic health conditions and social stigma about how they understand their immunity and in what practices they have engaged to strengthen their immune responsiveness since the outbreak of COVID. In participants' accounts, there were echoes of long-held concepts about immunity as self-defence against invasion and personal responsibility for strong immune responsiveness. However, these ideas were combined with less adversarial concepts referring to the importance of friendly collaboration with one's immune system, as well as the role of collective responses in strengthening individuals' immunity. Participants also acknowledged the influence of external factors beyond their control that affected their immunity. They were strongly supportive of COVID vaccines but also recognised that they were just one part of a 'package' of immunitarian behaviours and health factors required to protect themselves and others. This study, therefore, contributes to a more inclusive conceptualisation of immunity-related biopolitics that acknowledges the sociocultural and material conditions in which immunities extend beyond the atomised individual body.

COVID-19时代的免疫生活:边缘社会群体成员的理解、实践和经验。
自2019冠状病毒病暴发以来,人体免疫和免疫反应的概念受到了新的关注。本文报告了一个项目的调查结果,该项目采访了澳大利亚人口中四个边缘化亚群体的成员,他们经历过血源性病毒、其他慢性健康状况和社会耻辱,了解他们如何理解自己的免疫力,以及自COVID爆发以来他们采取了哪些措施来加强免疫反应。在与会者的叙述中,有一些长期存在的概念,即免疫是对入侵的自卫和对强免疫反应的个人责任。然而,这些想法与不那么对抗性的概念结合在一起,这些概念指的是与免疫系统友好合作的重要性,以及集体反应在加强个人免疫力方面的作用。与会者还承认,他们无法控制的外部因素影响了他们的免疫力。他们强烈支持COVID疫苗,但也认识到它们只是保护自己和他人所需的免疫行为和健康因素“一揽子”的一部分。因此,这项研究有助于对免疫相关的生物政治进行更具包容性的概念化,承认免疫延伸到原子化的个人身体之外的社会文化和物质条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书