Visualization analysis of the current status and emerging trends in cross-cultural research on traditional Chinese medicine using CitesPace

New Techno-Humanities Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.techum.2025.10.012
Liu Huan , Xie Ziwei , Jiang Junjie , Wang Jinghui , Chen Xinyi
{"title":"Visualization analysis of the current status and emerging trends in cross-cultural research on traditional Chinese medicine using CitesPace","authors":"Liu Huan ,&nbsp;Xie Ziwei ,&nbsp;Jiang Junjie ,&nbsp;Wang Jinghui ,&nbsp;Chen Xinyi","doi":"10.1016/j.techum.2025.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the trends and emerging areas of interest in cross-cultural research related to Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The retrieved articles were manually screened. Bibliometric analysis and visualization techniques were employed using CiteSpace software, with a focus on six key areas: annual publication volume, authorship, institutional contributions, keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering, and burst terms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis revealed a generally increasing trend in annual publication volume, with a peak observed in 2020. The network of core authors was found to be relatively dispersed. A significant proportion of the publications originated from universities specializing in TCM. Six distinct keyword clusters were identified, along with 25 burst terms, which were predominantly associated with TCM, cross-cultural studies, and cultural communication. The five most prominent terms in terms of intensity were “TCM,” “Guasha,” “reliability and validity,” “cross-cultural,” and “cultural communication.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Present research focal points in this domain encompass the translation of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) classics, cultural disparities, and TCM English education. Future investigations should enhance collaboration among research institutions and scholars, concentrating on cross-cultural communication pathways and strategies, the translation of TCM philosophical and cultural concepts, and translation into less commonly taught languages. The objective is to foster innovative practices in cross-cultural TCM research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100956,"journal":{"name":"New Techno-Humanities","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Techno-Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329425000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to investigate the trends and emerging areas of interest in cross-cultural research related to Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM).

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The retrieved articles were manually screened. Bibliometric analysis and visualization techniques were employed using CiteSpace software, with a focus on six key areas: annual publication volume, authorship, institutional contributions, keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering, and burst terms.

Results

The analysis revealed a generally increasing trend in annual publication volume, with a peak observed in 2020. The network of core authors was found to be relatively dispersed. A significant proportion of the publications originated from universities specializing in TCM. Six distinct keyword clusters were identified, along with 25 burst terms, which were predominantly associated with TCM, cross-cultural studies, and cultural communication. The five most prominent terms in terms of intensity were “TCM,” “Guasha,” “reliability and validity,” “cross-cultural,” and “cultural communication.”

Conclusions

Present research focal points in this domain encompass the translation of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) classics, cultural disparities, and TCM English education. Future investigations should enhance collaboration among research institutions and scholars, concentrating on cross-cultural communication pathways and strategies, the translation of TCM philosophical and cultural concepts, and translation into less commonly taught languages. The objective is to foster innovative practices in cross-cultural TCM research.
基于CitesPace的中医药跨文化研究现状及趋势可视化分析
目的本研究旨在探讨中医跨文化研究的趋势和新兴领域。方法在中国知网、万方、维普、中国医学信息网、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science等数据库进行综合文献检索。检索到的文章是手动筛选的。使用CiteSpace软件进行文献计量分析和可视化技术,重点关注6个关键领域:年出版量、作者、机构贡献、关键词共现、关键词聚类和突发术语。结果分析显示,年发表量总体呈上升趋势,在2020年达到高峰。研究发现,核心作者网络相对分散。相当比例的出版物来自中医专业的大学。我们发现了6个不同的关键词集群,以及25个突发术语,这些术语主要与中医、跨文化研究和文化交流有关。“中医”、“瓜沙”、“信度和效度”、“跨文化”和“文化交流”五个词在强度上最突出。结论目前中医英语翻译的研究热点包括经典翻译、文化差异和中医英语教育。未来的研究应加强研究机构和学者之间的合作,重点研究跨文化传播途径和策略、中医哲学和文化概念的翻译以及翻译成不太常用的语言。目标是促进跨文化中医研究的创新实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书