"We Don't Always Know What we are Missing." Research Teams' Perspectives on the Recruitment of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in General Population Research.

IF 1.1
Susan Racine Passmore, Morgan N Medina, Clara Mack, Madisin Randolph, Karla K Ausderau
{"title":"\"We Don't Always Know What we are Missing.\" Research Teams' Perspectives on the Recruitment of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in General Population Research.","authors":"Susan Racine Passmore, Morgan N Medina, Clara Mack, Madisin Randolph, Karla K Ausderau","doi":"10.1177/15562646251400490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ensuring that research participants accurately reflect patient populations is critical for the equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of studies; however, many groups experiencing health disparities remain underrepresented in research. This study interviewed research team members (n = 25) interested in inclusive recruitment to understand their perspectives on engaging adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in general population research. Team-based thematic analysis revealed barriers to the inclusion of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities including 1) use of direct and indirect exclusionary practices, 2) lack of knowledge and skills, 3) reliance on ad hoc accommodations, 4) perceptions that including adults with intellectual disabilities in research lacks scientific value, and 5) beliefs that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are not able or willing to participate. However, while team members acknowledged a lack of knowledge and skills to include people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, there was a strong interest in learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251400490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring that research participants accurately reflect patient populations is critical for the equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of studies; however, many groups experiencing health disparities remain underrepresented in research. This study interviewed research team members (n = 25) interested in inclusive recruitment to understand their perspectives on engaging adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in general population research. Team-based thematic analysis revealed barriers to the inclusion of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities including 1) use of direct and indirect exclusionary practices, 2) lack of knowledge and skills, 3) reliance on ad hoc accommodations, 4) perceptions that including adults with intellectual disabilities in research lacks scientific value, and 5) beliefs that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are not able or willing to participate. However, while team members acknowledged a lack of knowledge and skills to include people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, there was a strong interest in learning.

“我们并不总是知道我们错过了什么。”研究团队在普通人群研究中招募智力和发育障碍成人的观点。
确保研究参与者准确反映患者群体对于公平分配研究的利益和负担至关重要;然而,许多经历健康差异的群体在研究中的代表性仍然不足。本研究采访了对包容性招聘感兴趣的研究团队成员(n = 25),以了解他们对将智力和发育障碍成人纳入一般人群研究的看法。基于团队的专题分析揭示了将智力和发育障碍的成年人纳入研究的障碍,包括:1)使用直接和间接的排斥做法;2)缺乏知识和技能;3)依赖临时安排;4)认为将智力残疾的成年人纳入研究缺乏科学价值;5)认为智力和发育障碍的人不能或不愿意参与研究。然而,虽然团队成员承认缺乏知识和技能来容纳智力和发育障碍的人,但他们对学习有浓厚的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书