Why we do need explainable AI for healthcare.

IF 3.9
Giovanni Cinà, Tabea E Röber, Rob Goedhart, Ş İlker Birbil
{"title":"Why we do need explainable AI for healthcare.","authors":"Giovanni Cinà, Tabea E Röber, Rob Goedhart, Ş İlker Birbil","doi":"10.1186/s41512-025-00209-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent uptake in certified Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for healthcare applications has renewed the debate around their adoption. Explainable AI, the sub-discipline promising to render AI devices more transparent and trustworthy, has also come under scrutiny as part of this discussion. Some experts in the medical AI space debate the reliability of Explainable AI techniques, expressing concerns on their use and inclusion in guidelines and standards. Revisiting such criticisms, this article offers a balanced perspective on the utility of Explainable AI, focusing on the specificity of clinical applications of AI and placing them in the context of healthcare interventions. Against its detractors and despite valid concerns, we argue that the Explainable AI research program is still central to human-machine interaction and ultimately a useful tool against loss of control, a danger that cannot be prevented by rigorous clinical validation alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"9 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12670843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00209-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent uptake in certified Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for healthcare applications has renewed the debate around their adoption. Explainable AI, the sub-discipline promising to render AI devices more transparent and trustworthy, has also come under scrutiny as part of this discussion. Some experts in the medical AI space debate the reliability of Explainable AI techniques, expressing concerns on their use and inclusion in guidelines and standards. Revisiting such criticisms, this article offers a balanced perspective on the utility of Explainable AI, focusing on the specificity of clinical applications of AI and placing them in the context of healthcare interventions. Against its detractors and despite valid concerns, we argue that the Explainable AI research program is still central to human-machine interaction and ultimately a useful tool against loss of control, a danger that cannot be prevented by rigorous clinical validation alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

为什么我们在医疗领域需要可解释的人工智能。
最近,经过认证的人工智能(AI)工具在医疗保健应用中的应用再次引发了围绕它们的采用的争论。可解释的人工智能(可解释的人工智能)是一门有望使人工智能设备更加透明和可信的分支学科,作为讨论的一部分,它也受到了密切关注。医疗人工智能领域的一些专家对可解释人工智能技术的可靠性进行了辩论,对其使用和纳入准则和标准表示关切。本文回顾了这些批评,对可解释人工智能的效用提供了一个平衡的视角,重点关注人工智能临床应用的特殊性,并将其置于医疗保健干预的背景下。尽管存在合理的担忧,但我们认为,可解释的人工智能研究项目仍然是人机交互的核心,并最终成为防止失控的有用工具,而这种危险仅靠严格的临床验证是无法预防的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书