Luis Ayerbe , Quintí Foguet-Boreu , Ivo Forgnone , María Pérez-Piñar , Rohini Mathur , Salma Ayis
{"title":"Risk of haemorrhagic strokes in patients with psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Luis Ayerbe , Quintí Foguet-Boreu , Ivo Forgnone , María Pérez-Piñar , Rohini Mathur , Salma Ayis","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Strong evidence on the risk of haemorrhagic strokes for those with psychiatric conditions may lead to more effective interventions for mental health patients and inform future studies. This systematic review aimed to identify all the studies that compare the risk of haemorrhagic stroke for patients with and without depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar or personality disorders. It also aimed to provide a summary estimate of the risk, where possible, using meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Electronic searches were conducted in Embase, PsycINFO, PubMED, Scopus and the Web of Science, from database inception to the 11th of March 2025. A Random-effects model to estimate the pooled effect size with 95% confidence intervals was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>17,214 references were initially identified. Eleven articles were included. Seven of them, five observational and two mendelian randomisation studies, investigated depression. In the meta-analysis depression showed a significant association with an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke, with pooled HR: 1.28 (1.19–1.38) when only observational studies were included. When mendelian randomisation studies were added the result was a pooled HR: 1.26 (1.08–1.44). The risk of haemorrhagic stroke was increased in one of the three studies that investigated patients with anxiety disorders and in one of the three that looked at patients with schizophrenia. Two studies of bipolar disorder, and one of personality disorders, reported that patients with these conditions do not have an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with depression have an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke. The association of mental illness with haemorrhagic stroke needs further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"37 1","pages":"Article 500738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849625000711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Strong evidence on the risk of haemorrhagic strokes for those with psychiatric conditions may lead to more effective interventions for mental health patients and inform future studies. This systematic review aimed to identify all the studies that compare the risk of haemorrhagic stroke for patients with and without depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar or personality disorders. It also aimed to provide a summary estimate of the risk, where possible, using meta-analysis.
Methods
Electronic searches were conducted in Embase, PsycINFO, PubMED, Scopus and the Web of Science, from database inception to the 11th of March 2025. A Random-effects model to estimate the pooled effect size with 95% confidence intervals was used.
Results
17,214 references were initially identified. Eleven articles were included. Seven of them, five observational and two mendelian randomisation studies, investigated depression. In the meta-analysis depression showed a significant association with an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke, with pooled HR: 1.28 (1.19–1.38) when only observational studies were included. When mendelian randomisation studies were added the result was a pooled HR: 1.26 (1.08–1.44). The risk of haemorrhagic stroke was increased in one of the three studies that investigated patients with anxiety disorders and in one of the three that looked at patients with schizophrenia. Two studies of bipolar disorder, and one of personality disorders, reported that patients with these conditions do not have an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke.
Conclusion
Patients with depression have an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke. The association of mental illness with haemorrhagic stroke needs further research.
目的:关于精神疾病患者出血性中风风险的有力证据可能导致对精神健康患者进行更有效的干预,并为未来的研究提供信息。本系统综述旨在确定所有比较患有和不患有抑郁症、焦虑症、精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或人格障碍患者出血性中风风险的研究。在可能的情况下,它还旨在使用荟萃分析提供风险的汇总估计。方法:在Embase、PsycINFO、PubMED、Scopus和Web of Science中检索自建库至2025年3月11日的文献。采用随机效应模型估计合并效应大小,置信区间为95%。结果:初步鉴定文献17214篇。纳入了11篇文章。其中7项研究,5项观察性研究和2项孟德尔随机研究,调查了抑郁症。在荟萃分析中,抑郁症与出血性卒中风险增加有显著关联,仅纳入观察性研究时,合并HR为1.28(1.19-1.38)。当加入孟德尔随机化研究时,合并风险比为1.26(1.08-1.44)。在调查焦虑症患者的三项研究中的一项和对精神分裂症患者的三项研究中的一项中,出血性中风的风险都有所增加。两项关于双相情感障碍的研究和一项关于人格障碍的研究报告称,患有这些疾病的患者发生出血性中风的风险并没有增加。结论:抑郁症患者发生出血性卒中的风险增加。精神疾病与出血性中风的关系需要进一步研究。