Addressing Power in Local-Level Policies and Programs to Reduce Health Inequities - A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sally Schultz, Anne Barrow, Sharon Friel, Christina Zorbas, Anna Peeters, Kathryn Backholer
{"title":"Addressing Power in Local-Level Policies and Programs to Reduce Health Inequities - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sally Schultz, Anne Barrow, Sharon Friel, Christina Zorbas, Anna Peeters, Kathryn Backholer","doi":"10.1177/27551938251401131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health inequities are driven by the unequal distribution of resources and power. Local-level actors are closely connected to communities and have the potential to address unfair imbalances in power through health equity interventions. Yet practical strategies on how to do this remain unclear. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of five databases, examining how power was addressed in the design and implementation of local-level health equity interventions and their reported impacts. Thirty-eight international studies were analysed using the Health Equity Power Framework and Four Expressions of Power typology. Most articles described community organizing, health education, advocacy, and community funding initiatives. Interventions that strengthened community knowledge, connectedness, and leadership rebalanced power by enhancing individual and collective agency. Shifts in rigid, inequitable structures and institutional processes were observed when interventions activated multiple types of power, across different forms and spaces. Interventions informed by power-centered frameworks and principles, such as empowerment theory and self-determination, helped actors rebalance power dynamics, while entrenched structural and institutional power imbalances moderated efforts to rebalance power. This review underscores the role of local governments, institutions, and community actors in addressing power imbalances and provides practical guidance on strategies to support equitable policymaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12987999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938251401131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health inequities are driven by the unequal distribution of resources and power. Local-level actors are closely connected to communities and have the potential to address unfair imbalances in power through health equity interventions. Yet practical strategies on how to do this remain unclear. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of five databases, examining how power was addressed in the design and implementation of local-level health equity interventions and their reported impacts. Thirty-eight international studies were analysed using the Health Equity Power Framework and Four Expressions of Power typology. Most articles described community organizing, health education, advocacy, and community funding initiatives. Interventions that strengthened community knowledge, connectedness, and leadership rebalanced power by enhancing individual and collective agency. Shifts in rigid, inequitable structures and institutional processes were observed when interventions activated multiple types of power, across different forms and spaces. Interventions informed by power-centered frameworks and principles, such as empowerment theory and self-determination, helped actors rebalance power dynamics, while entrenched structural and institutional power imbalances moderated efforts to rebalance power. This review underscores the role of local governments, institutions, and community actors in addressing power imbalances and provides practical guidance on strategies to support equitable policymaking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

解决地方一级政策和项目中的权力问题,以减少卫生不公平——系统回顾。
卫生不公平是由资源和权力分配不平等造成的。地方一级行为体与社区关系密切,有可能通过卫生公平干预措施解决不公平的权力不平衡问题。然而,如何做到这一点的实际策略仍不清楚。为了解决这一差距,我们对五个数据库进行了系统审查,检查了在设计和实施地方一级卫生公平干预措施及其报告的影响中如何解决权力问题。使用健康公平权力框架和权力类型的四种表达对38项国际研究进行了分析。大多数文章描述了社区组织、健康教育、宣传和社区资助倡议。通过加强个人和集体的能动性,加强社区知识、连通性和领导力的干预措施重新平衡了权力。当干预在不同形式和空间中激活多种类型的权力时,可以观察到刚性、不公平的结构和制度过程的变化。以权力为中心的框架和原则(如赋权理论和自决)为指导的干预措施有助于行动者重新平衡权力动态,而根深蒂固的结构性和制度性权力失衡则减缓了重新平衡权力的努力。本综述强调了地方政府、机构和社区行为体在解决权力不平衡方面的作用,并就支持公平决策的战略提供了实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书