Evaluation of a Second-line Treatment in Female Adolescents With SSRI-nonresponsive Major Depression: A Real-world Data Analysis on Bupropion Versus Duloxetine.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sina Ahmadifar, Mohaddese Shafiee Pour, Naeemeh Dini, Mohammad Reza Seddigh
{"title":"Evaluation of a Second-line Treatment in Female Adolescents With SSRI-nonresponsive Major Depression: A Real-world Data Analysis on Bupropion Versus Duloxetine.","authors":"Sina Ahmadifar, Mohaddese Shafiee Pour, Naeemeh Dini, Mohammad Reza Seddigh","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A significant number of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond adequately to first-line treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Approximately 30% of patients fall into this category and often require a switch to a second-line antidepressant. These patients frequently experience more severe and persistent symptoms, along with an elevated risk of suicide. Switching to an alternative monotherapy such as duloxetine or bupropion is a common strategy in cases with inadequate response to SSRIs. Bupropion, in use for over 2 decades, works by inhibiting the reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine and is sometimes used alongside SSRIs. Duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has demonstrated strong efficacy, safety, and tolerability in the treatment of MDD. However, antidepressants can occasionally increase suicidal thoughts or behaviors, particularly among adolescents. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare not only the therapeutic outcomes of duloxetine and bupropion, but also the rates of any suicide attempts in female adolescents while taking these medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed medical records of 990 female adolescents diagnosed with MDD who were treated with either duloxetine (120 mg/d; n=464) or bupropion (300 mg/d; n=526). Patients were selected according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and followed for up to 24 weeks. Clinical data were extracted from charts at time points corresponding approximately to weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Depression severity and treatment outcomes were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Goal Attainment Scaling for Depression (GAS-D). The sensitivity of MADRS to symptom changes was also evaluated. Suicide attempts were identified using ICD-9 codes (E950 to E959), clinical notes, and related medication history involving SSRIs and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings from the study revealed that bupropion led to a greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared with duloxetine. In addition, the incidence of suicide attempts was higher in the duloxetine group than in the bupropion group.</p><p><strong>Originality: </strong>This study is distinct in its focus on female adolescents with MDD, applying a triple-blind design and utilizing both standardized (MADRS) and personalized (GAS-D) outcome measures. By including an analysis of suicide attempt rates, it offers important clinical insights into the comparative effectiveness and safety of bupropion and duloxetine in a particularly vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 6","pages":"302-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A significant number of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond adequately to first-line treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Approximately 30% of patients fall into this category and often require a switch to a second-line antidepressant. These patients frequently experience more severe and persistent symptoms, along with an elevated risk of suicide. Switching to an alternative monotherapy such as duloxetine or bupropion is a common strategy in cases with inadequate response to SSRIs. Bupropion, in use for over 2 decades, works by inhibiting the reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine and is sometimes used alongside SSRIs. Duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has demonstrated strong efficacy, safety, and tolerability in the treatment of MDD. However, antidepressants can occasionally increase suicidal thoughts or behaviors, particularly among adolescents. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare not only the therapeutic outcomes of duloxetine and bupropion, but also the rates of any suicide attempts in female adolescents while taking these medications.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed medical records of 990 female adolescents diagnosed with MDD who were treated with either duloxetine (120 mg/d; n=464) or bupropion (300 mg/d; n=526). Patients were selected according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and followed for up to 24 weeks. Clinical data were extracted from charts at time points corresponding approximately to weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Depression severity and treatment outcomes were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Goal Attainment Scaling for Depression (GAS-D). The sensitivity of MADRS to symptom changes was also evaluated. Suicide attempts were identified using ICD-9 codes (E950 to E959), clinical notes, and related medication history involving SSRIs and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

Results: The findings from the study revealed that bupropion led to a greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared with duloxetine. In addition, the incidence of suicide attempts was higher in the duloxetine group than in the bupropion group.

Originality: This study is distinct in its focus on female adolescents with MDD, applying a triple-blind design and utilizing both standardized (MADRS) and personalized (GAS-D) outcome measures. By including an analysis of suicide attempt rates, it offers important clinical insights into the comparative effectiveness and safety of bupropion and duloxetine in a particularly vulnerable population.

评价女性青少年ssri无反应性重度抑郁症的二线治疗:安非他酮与度洛西汀的真实世界数据分析。
目的:大量重度抑郁症(MDD)患者对选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的一线治疗反应不充分。大约30%的患者属于这一类,通常需要改用二线抗抑郁药。这些患者通常会出现更严重和持续的症状,同时自杀的风险也会增加。在对SSRIs反应不足的病例中,切换到替代单一疗法,如度洛西汀或安非他酮是一种常见的策略。安非他酮通过抑制多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素的再吸收起作用,使用了20多年,有时与SSRIs一起使用。度洛西汀是一种5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,在治疗重度抑郁症中表现出很强的疗效、安全性和耐受性。然而,抗抑郁药偶尔会增加自杀的想法或行为,尤其是在青少年中。因此,本研究的目的不仅是比较度洛西汀和安非他酮的治疗效果,而且还比较服用这些药物的女性青少年的自杀企图率。方法:回顾性分析990例诊断为重度抑郁症的女性青少年患者的医疗记录,这些患者接受度洛西汀(120 mg/d, n=464)或安非他酮(300 mg/d, n=526)治疗。根据严格的纳入和排除标准选择患者,随访24周。从图表中提取大约对应于第4、8、12、16、20和24周的时间点的临床数据。采用Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和抑郁目标实现量表(GAS-D)评估抑郁严重程度和治疗结果。同时评估了MADRS对症状变化的敏感性。使用ICD-9代码(E950至E959)、临床记录和涉及SSRIs和5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂的相关用药史来识别自杀企图。结果:研究结果显示,与度洛西汀相比,安非他酮能更有效地减轻抑郁症状。此外,度洛西汀组的自杀企图发生率高于安非他酮组。独创性:本研究的独特之处在于其对患有重度抑郁症的女性青少年的关注,采用三盲设计,并使用标准化(MADRS)和个性化(GAS-D)结果测量。通过对自杀企图率的分析,它为安非他酮和度洛西汀在特别脆弱人群中的相对有效性和安全性提供了重要的临床见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书