Public health implications of pig-to-human xenotransplantation at scale.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Asal Adawi, Gregory Hawley, Syed Zain Ahmad, Candice Madakadze, Fahad Buskandar, Ranie Ahmed, Andrea K Boggild
{"title":"Public health implications of pig-to-human xenotransplantation at scale.","authors":"Asal Adawi, Gregory Hawley, Syed Zain Ahmad, Candice Madakadze, Fahad Buskandar, Ranie Ahmed, Andrea K Boggild","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The current global shortage of organs from human donors has resulted in long wait lists and increasing mortality among patients with end-stage organ failure. Pig-to-human xenotransplantation has been touted as a solution to this problem. However, significant infectious diseases and public health considerations exist with such a technological advancement.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Infectious diseases hazards with public health implications of pig-to-human xenotransplantation may be categorized taxonomically, according to temporality of potential exposure and/or reactivation, or according to anthroponotic versus zoonotic transmission. Additionally, the potential for escalating proportions of immunosuppression-at-scale in the context of the theoretically less-constrained resource of xenografts warrants particular consideration given that impacts will be differentially borne by those most affected by reactivating infections including but not limited to tuberculosis (TB), hepatitis B (HBV), and strongyloidiasis. TB, HBV, and strongyloidiasis all represent chronic infections with potential for reactivation under circumstances of immunosuppression - owing to either allograft or xenograft transplantation - that differentially impact those living in rural poverty globally, and those with risk factors for acquisition related to crowding, poor sanitation, undernutrition, and economic disenfranchisement. Chagas disease and leishmaniasis portend similar possibility of reactivation and differentially affect those residing in the global South.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We herein situate the public health implications of xenotransplantation at scale within the broader landscape of infectious diseases hazards related to the technology, and propose a health equity and human rights based framework for global risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The current global shortage of organs from human donors has resulted in long wait lists and increasing mortality among patients with end-stage organ failure. Pig-to-human xenotransplantation has been touted as a solution to this problem. However, significant infectious diseases and public health considerations exist with such a technological advancement.

Recent findings: Infectious diseases hazards with public health implications of pig-to-human xenotransplantation may be categorized taxonomically, according to temporality of potential exposure and/or reactivation, or according to anthroponotic versus zoonotic transmission. Additionally, the potential for escalating proportions of immunosuppression-at-scale in the context of the theoretically less-constrained resource of xenografts warrants particular consideration given that impacts will be differentially borne by those most affected by reactivating infections including but not limited to tuberculosis (TB), hepatitis B (HBV), and strongyloidiasis. TB, HBV, and strongyloidiasis all represent chronic infections with potential for reactivation under circumstances of immunosuppression - owing to either allograft or xenograft transplantation - that differentially impact those living in rural poverty globally, and those with risk factors for acquisition related to crowding, poor sanitation, undernutrition, and economic disenfranchisement. Chagas disease and leishmaniasis portend similar possibility of reactivation and differentially affect those residing in the global South.

Summary: We herein situate the public health implications of xenotransplantation at scale within the broader landscape of infectious diseases hazards related to the technology, and propose a health equity and human rights based framework for global risk assessment.

大规模猪-人异种移植对公共卫生的影响。
综述目的:目前全球器官供体短缺,导致终末期器官衰竭患者的等待名单长,死亡率上升。猪到人的异种移植被吹捧为解决这一问题的一种方法。然而,随着这种技术进步,存在着重大的传染病和公共卫生问题。最近的发现:猪到人异种移植对公共卫生影响的传染病危害可根据潜在接触和/或再激活的时间,或根据人畜共患传播进行分类。此外,在理论上限制较少的异种移植物资源的背景下,免疫抑制的潜在比例升级值得特别考虑,因为受再激活感染影响最大的患者(包括但不限于结核病(TB)、乙型肝炎(HBV)和类圆线虫病)的影响将不同。结核病、乙型肝炎病毒和类圆线虫病都是慢性感染,在免疫抑制的情况下(由于同种异体移植或异种移植)有可能重新激活,这对全球农村贫困人口以及与拥挤、卫生条件差、营养不良和经济权利剥夺相关的感染风险因素有不同的影响。恰加斯病和利什曼病预示着类似的重新激活可能性,并对居住在全球南方的人产生不同的影响。摘要:我们在此将异种移植的公共卫生影响置于与该技术相关的传染病危害的更广泛背景下,并提出了一个基于健康公平和人权的全球风险评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书