Automated chain-of-thought evaluation framework for large language model-generated emergency department documentation: a simulation-based study.

IF 3.4 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.15441/ceem.25.153
Dasol Choi, Junhyuk Seo, Won Cul Cha, Minha Kim, Sejin Heo, Hansol Chang, Taerim Kim
{"title":"Automated chain-of-thought evaluation framework for large language model-generated emergency department documentation: a simulation-based study.","authors":"Dasol Choi, Junhyuk Seo, Won Cul Cha, Minha Kim, Sejin Heo, Hansol Chang, Taerim Kim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.25.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate MEDIVAL (Medical Documentation Validation), a progressive chain-of-thought (CoT) evaluation framework for automated assessment of large language model (LLM)-generated emergency department documentation, designed to align with expert clinical judgment in acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a three-tier evaluation framework incorporating persona-based, error-enhanced, and insight-integrated strategies. The framework was tested across four LLMs (GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5, Claude-3.7) on 33 emergency department records reviewed by four expert emergency physicians. Each model applied the three CoT strategies across five criteria: appropriateness, accuracy, structure/format, conciseness, and clinical validity. Model outputs were compared with expert ratings using Spearman correlation coefficients. Differences were analyzed with the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. Reproducibility was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models demonstrated stronger alignment with expert ratings as CoT complexity increased, with Claude-3.7 (r=0.712, P<0.001) and GPT-4o (r=0.702, P<0.001) showing the highest correlations under the insight-integrated strategy. GPT-4.1 showed the greatest relative improvement (43.3% increase, r=0.457 to r=0.655, P<0.001). Significant overall differences were observed across strategies (χ2 (2)=48.39, P<0.001), though the error-enhanced and insight-integrated approaches differed only modestly yet significantly (P=0.002). High reproducibility was confirmed (ICC >0.919), with Claude-3.5 achieving the most consistent results (ICC, 0.997-0.998).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MEDIVAL demonstrates that progressive CoT strategies systematically improve automated evaluation of emergency department documentation while maintaining excellent reproducibility. This framework offers a viable prescreening tool to reduce expert workload and support reliable artificial intelligence integration into emergency medicine workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.25.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate MEDIVAL (Medical Documentation Validation), a progressive chain-of-thought (CoT) evaluation framework for automated assessment of large language model (LLM)-generated emergency department documentation, designed to align with expert clinical judgment in acute care settings.

Methods: We designed a three-tier evaluation framework incorporating persona-based, error-enhanced, and insight-integrated strategies. The framework was tested across four LLMs (GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5, Claude-3.7) on 33 emergency department records reviewed by four expert emergency physicians. Each model applied the three CoT strategies across five criteria: appropriateness, accuracy, structure/format, conciseness, and clinical validity. Model outputs were compared with expert ratings using Spearman correlation coefficients. Differences were analyzed with the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. Reproducibility was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis.

Results: All models demonstrated stronger alignment with expert ratings as CoT complexity increased, with Claude-3.7 (r=0.712, P<0.001) and GPT-4o (r=0.702, P<0.001) showing the highest correlations under the insight-integrated strategy. GPT-4.1 showed the greatest relative improvement (43.3% increase, r=0.457 to r=0.655, P<0.001). Significant overall differences were observed across strategies (χ2 (2)=48.39, P<0.001), though the error-enhanced and insight-integrated approaches differed only modestly yet significantly (P=0.002). High reproducibility was confirmed (ICC >0.919), with Claude-3.5 achieving the most consistent results (ICC, 0.997-0.998).

Conclusion: MEDIVAL demonstrates that progressive CoT strategies systematically improve automated evaluation of emergency department documentation while maintaining excellent reproducibility. This framework offers a viable prescreening tool to reduce expert workload and support reliable artificial intelligence integration into emergency medicine workflows.

人工智能生成的急诊科文档的自动评估框架:思想链验证研究。
目的:开发和验证MEDIVAL,这是一种先进的思维链(CoT)评估框架,用于自动评估大型语言模型(LLM)生成的急诊科文档,该文档与急性护理环境中的专家临床判断相一致。方法:我们开发了一个三层评估框架,使用基于角色、错误增强和洞察力集成的策略。该框架在四个法学硕士(gpt - 40、GPT-4.1、Claude- 3.5、Claude-3.7)中进行了测试,并由四位急诊专家评估了33份急诊科记录。每个模型使用三种渐进式CoT策略评估五个标准:适当性、准确性、结构/格式、简洁性和临床有效性。评价比较采用Spearman相关,差异评估采用Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验,并采用Bonferroni校正。用类内相关系数(ICC)分析评价再现性。结果:随着CoT复杂性的增加,所有模型的专家一致性都有所提高,其中Claude-3.7一致性最高(r=0.712, P 0.919), Claude-3.5一致性最高(0.997-0.998)。结论:MEDIVAL表明渐进式CoT策略系统地增强了急诊科文件的自动评估,同时保持了高再现性。这为减少专家工作量提供了一种可行的预筛选工具,同时支持将可靠的人工智能集成到急诊医学工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书