Neophilia in wolves and dogs

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Dániel Rivas-Blanco, Lou Gonnet-dit-Revel, Friederike Range, Sabine Tebbich, Sarah Marshall-Pescini
{"title":"Neophilia in wolves and dogs","authors":"Dániel Rivas-Blanco,&nbsp;Lou Gonnet-dit-Revel,&nbsp;Friederike Range,&nbsp;Sabine Tebbich,&nbsp;Sarah Marshall-Pescini","doi":"10.1007/s10071-025-02019-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study of domestication provides a unique opportunity to analyze the effects of natural selection in the attraction towards novelty, because selective pressures on domesticated animals are often greatly diminished or different from their wild counterparts. In this study, we investigated the neophilic levels of three groups of canids differing in their level of contact with human environments both from an evolutionary and ontogenetic perspective: wolves, pack-living dogs, and pet dogs. In order to study their neophilic response, we presented the animals with two objects. The first of these objects was displayed in the animals’ enclosure for several days. After the animals were habituated to this first object, the second one was introduced together with the first one in a shorter test session meant to explore their preferences for either of the objects. We predicted that dogs —and pet dogs in particular— to display higher levels of neophilia, because human-created environments tend to change at a faster pace, and thus, a higher drive to explore these changes would be more beneficial than in a comparably more stable environment. Our results show no apparent differences between the groups in terms of latency to approach the new object, nor in the identity of the object they approached first. Nonetheless, all groups interacted more with the new object during the test phase. Wolves also interacted longer with the object presented in the first phase of the experiment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-025-02019-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-025-02019-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of domestication provides a unique opportunity to analyze the effects of natural selection in the attraction towards novelty, because selective pressures on domesticated animals are often greatly diminished or different from their wild counterparts. In this study, we investigated the neophilic levels of three groups of canids differing in their level of contact with human environments both from an evolutionary and ontogenetic perspective: wolves, pack-living dogs, and pet dogs. In order to study their neophilic response, we presented the animals with two objects. The first of these objects was displayed in the animals’ enclosure for several days. After the animals were habituated to this first object, the second one was introduced together with the first one in a shorter test session meant to explore their preferences for either of the objects. We predicted that dogs —and pet dogs in particular— to display higher levels of neophilia, because human-created environments tend to change at a faster pace, and thus, a higher drive to explore these changes would be more beneficial than in a comparably more stable environment. Our results show no apparent differences between the groups in terms of latency to approach the new object, nor in the identity of the object they approached first. Nonetheless, all groups interacted more with the new object during the test phase. Wolves also interacted longer with the object presented in the first phase of the experiment.

狼和狗的新欢。
驯化的研究提供了一个独特的机会来分析自然选择对新颖性的吸引力的影响,因为对家养动物的选择压力往往大大减少或不同于野生动物。在这项研究中,我们从进化和个体发生的角度研究了三种与人类环境接触程度不同的犬科动物的亲新水平:狼、野狗和宠物狗。为了研究它们的亲新反应,我们给了这些动物两个物体。这些物品中的第一件在动物的围栏里展示了几天。在动物习惯了第一个物体之后,在一个较短的测试过程中,将第二个物体与第一个物体放在一起,以探索它们对其中任何一个物体的偏好。我们预测狗——尤其是宠物狗——会表现出更高水平的恋新情绪,因为人类创造的环境往往会以更快的速度变化,因此,与相对稳定的环境相比,探索这些变化的更高动力会更有益。我们的结果表明,在接近新物体的延迟时间方面,两组之间没有明显的差异,也没有他们首先接近的物体的身份差异。尽管如此,在测试阶段,所有组都与新对象进行了更多的交互。在实验的第一阶段,狼与物体的互动时间也更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书