Mechanical needle guidance for ultrasound-guided parasagittal oblique in-plane paravertebral blocks: a cadaveric study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844716
Hesham Elsharkawy , Ece Yamak Altinpulluk , Tetsuya Shimada , Ilker Ince , Guangmei Mao , Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro , Loran Mounir Soliman , Nair Harsha , Marta Kelava , Richard Drake , Xuan Pu , Daniel I. Sessler , Alparslan Turan
{"title":"Mechanical needle guidance for ultrasound-guided parasagittal oblique in-plane paravertebral blocks: a cadaveric study","authors":"Hesham Elsharkawy ,&nbsp;Ece Yamak Altinpulluk ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Shimada ,&nbsp;Ilker Ince ,&nbsp;Guangmei Mao ,&nbsp;Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro ,&nbsp;Loran Mounir Soliman ,&nbsp;Nair Harsha ,&nbsp;Marta Kelava ,&nbsp;Richard Drake ,&nbsp;Xuan Pu ,&nbsp;Daniel I. Sessler ,&nbsp;Alparslan Turan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Paravertebral blocks provide analgesia for a range of thoracoabdominal surgeries. However, visualizing the needle tip during the procedure can be challenging, especially for clinicians with limited experience, because the target is deep. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that needle guidance by the Infiniti Plus system improves ultrasound visualization of the needle tip during thoracic paravertebral blocks performed by novice residents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nineteen clinical anesthesia residents each performed 20 bilateral ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blocks (T2–T11) on 17 unembalmed cadavers, with and without the use of a fixed-angle mechanical needle guide in a randomized crossover design. The primary outcome, percent perfect needle visibility, was compared between guided and unguided methods using a paired <em>t</em>-test. Secondary outcomes, including time to needle visualization, number of needle insertion attempts, and subjective ease-of-use ratings, were analyzed using paired <em>t</em>-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for overall perception ratings was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in needle-target visualization (62% ± 17% with guidance vs. 64% ± 18% without, p = 0.15), time to target (HR = 1.00 [95% CI 0.86–1.16], p = 0.99), procedural difficulty scores, or number of insertion attempts between guided and unguided blocks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Infiniti Plus mechanical needle guide did not demonstrate improved ultrasound needle tip visualization during thoracic paravertebral blocks performed by novice clinicians in cadavers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"76 1","pages":"Article 844716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425001319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Paravertebral blocks provide analgesia for a range of thoracoabdominal surgeries. However, visualizing the needle tip during the procedure can be challenging, especially for clinicians with limited experience, because the target is deep. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that needle guidance by the Infiniti Plus system improves ultrasound visualization of the needle tip during thoracic paravertebral blocks performed by novice residents.

Methods

Nineteen clinical anesthesia residents each performed 20 bilateral ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blocks (T2–T11) on 17 unembalmed cadavers, with and without the use of a fixed-angle mechanical needle guide in a randomized crossover design. The primary outcome, percent perfect needle visibility, was compared between guided and unguided methods using a paired t-test. Secondary outcomes, including time to needle visualization, number of needle insertion attempts, and subjective ease-of-use ratings, were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for overall perception ratings was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

Results

There were no significant differences in needle-target visualization (62% ± 17% with guidance vs. 64% ± 18% without, p = 0.15), time to target (HR = 1.00 [95% CI 0.86–1.16], p = 0.99), procedural difficulty scores, or number of insertion attempts between guided and unguided blocks.

Conclusion

The Infiniti Plus mechanical needle guide did not demonstrate improved ultrasound needle tip visualization during thoracic paravertebral blocks performed by novice clinicians in cadavers.
超声引导下矢状旁斜椎旁阻滞的机械针引导:一项尸体研究。
背景:椎旁阻滞为一系列胸腹外科手术提供镇痛。然而,在手术过程中可视化针尖可能具有挑战性,特别是对于经验有限的临床医生来说,因为目标很深。因此,我们验证了最初的假设,即在新手住院医师进行胸椎旁阻滞时,Infiniti Plus系统的针头引导可以改善针尖的超声可视化。方法:采用随机交叉设计,19名临床麻醉住院医师分别在17具非防腐尸体上进行了20次双侧超声引导下的胸椎旁阻滞(T2-T11),使用和不使用固定角度机械导针。使用配对t检验比较引导和非引导方法的主要结果,完美针头可见度百分比。次要结果,包括针的可视化时间、针插入次数和主观易用性评分,分别使用配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行分析。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估整体感知评分的评分者间信度。结果:两组患者在针靶可见性(有引导组62%±17% vs无引导组64%±18%,p = 0.15)、到达靶点时间(HR = 1.00 [95% CI 0.86-1.16], p = 0.99)、手术难度评分、有引导和无引导组插入次数均无显著差异。结论:在新手临床医生对尸体进行胸椎旁阻滞时,Infiniti Plus机械导针器并没有显示出更好的超声针尖可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书