Enhanced Detection of EGFRvIII in Tumors

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.11.002
Nan Chen , Jingjing Feng , Dong Wan , Dongbing Li , Sheng Xiao
{"title":"Enhanced Detection of EGFRvIII in Tumors","authors":"Nan Chen ,&nbsp;Jingjing Feng ,&nbsp;Dong Wan ,&nbsp;Dongbing Li ,&nbsp;Sheng Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epidermal growth factor receptor variant (EGFRv)-III, a common oncogenic variant in glioblastoma and other solid tumors, results from an in-frame deletion of exons 2 to 7 from the <em>EGFR</em> gene. Detection of EGFRvIII is crucial for understanding tumor biology, guiding targeted therapies, and developing personalized treatment strategies. In this study, two detection approaches based on DNA next-generation sequencing—read depth (RD)-based and split read (SR)-based detection—were compared to evaluate their sensitivity and accuracy in identifying EGFRvIII. Thirty-one tumor samples, including glioblastoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, were analyzed using both methods. The SR-based method detected EGFRvIII in 20 of 31 samples, while the RD-based method identified it in only 12 samples (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), demonstrating that the SR-based method had significantly higher sensitivity. RNA next-generation sequencing confirmed EGFRvIII expression in most SR-positive cases. Additionally, the SR-based method identified multiple breakpoints in several tumors, revealing intratumor heterogeneity and the subclonal origins of EGFRvIII. The RD-based method was prone to false negatives, particularly in cases with high <em>EGFR</em> amplification or low tumor cell percentage, where copy number variations could be masked by background noise. The findings highlight the sensitivity and accuracy of SR-based detection in identifying EGFRvIII and capturing intratumor heterogeneity. SR-based analysis is recommended as the method for EGFRvIII detection in both clinical and research settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157825002909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor variant (EGFRv)-III, a common oncogenic variant in glioblastoma and other solid tumors, results from an in-frame deletion of exons 2 to 7 from the EGFR gene. Detection of EGFRvIII is crucial for understanding tumor biology, guiding targeted therapies, and developing personalized treatment strategies. In this study, two detection approaches based on DNA next-generation sequencing—read depth (RD)-based and split read (SR)-based detection—were compared to evaluate their sensitivity and accuracy in identifying EGFRvIII. Thirty-one tumor samples, including glioblastoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, were analyzed using both methods. The SR-based method detected EGFRvIII in 20 of 31 samples, while the RD-based method identified it in only 12 samples (P < 0.001), demonstrating that the SR-based method had significantly higher sensitivity. RNA next-generation sequencing confirmed EGFRvIII expression in most SR-positive cases. Additionally, the SR-based method identified multiple breakpoints in several tumors, revealing intratumor heterogeneity and the subclonal origins of EGFRvIII. The RD-based method was prone to false negatives, particularly in cases with high EGFR amplification or low tumor cell percentage, where copy number variations could be masked by background noise. The findings highlight the sensitivity and accuracy of SR-based detection in identifying EGFRvIII and capturing intratumor heterogeneity. SR-based analysis is recommended as the method for EGFRvIII detection in both clinical and research settings.
肿瘤中EGFRvIII的增强检测:基于分裂读取和读取深度的DNA测序方法的比较研究。
表皮生长因子受体变异III (EGFRvIII)是胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)和其他实体肿瘤中常见的致癌变异,是由EGFR基因框架内2-7外显子缺失引起的。EGFRvIII的检测对于理解肿瘤生物学、指导靶向治疗和制定个性化治疗策略至关重要。在本研究中,我们比较了基于DNA下一代测序(NGS)的两种检测方法——基于读取深度(RD)的检测和基于分裂读取(SR)的检测——以评估它们在识别EGFRvIII方面的敏感性和准确性。采用两种方法分析了31例肿瘤样本,包括胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)和胰腺腺癌。基于sr的方法在31个样本中检测到20个EGFRvIII,而基于rd的方法仅在12个样本中检测到EGFRvIII,表明基于sr的方法具有显著更高的灵敏度(p < 0.001)。RNA NGS证实EGFRvIII在大多数sr阳性病例中表达。此外,基于sr的方法确定了几种肿瘤中的多个断点,揭示了肿瘤内异质性和EGFRvIII的亚克隆起源。基于rd的方法容易出现假阴性,特别是在EGFR扩增率高或肿瘤细胞百分比低的情况下,其中拷贝数变化可能被背景噪声掩盖。研究结果强调了基于sr的检测在识别EGFRvIII和捕获肿瘤内异质性方面的优越敏感性和准确性。在临床和研究环境中,推荐基于sr的分析作为EGFRvIII检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书