Paths towards commercialization: evidence from NIH proof of concept centers.

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Technology Transfer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s10961-025-10187-w
Adams G Bailey, Breanna M Reingold, Joseph D Johnson, Alan C O'Connor
{"title":"Paths towards commercialization: evidence from NIH proof of concept centers.","authors":"Adams G Bailey, Breanna M Reingold, Joseph D Johnson, Alan C O'Connor","doi":"10.1007/s10961-025-10187-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proof of Concept Centers (PoCCs) are important mechanisms for supporting technology transfer and enabling the commercialization efforts of academic innovators. However, there is limited evidence on the success of PoCCs in supporting projects towards commercialization, especially in the life sciences. We examine how principal investigator (PI) and technology characteristics impact initial actions and commercialization strategies within a PoCC. Through a unique data set that tracks 275 biomedical technologies funded by the National Institutes of Health Centers for Accelerated Innovations (NCAI) and Research Evaluation and Commercialization Hubs (REACH), we find evidence of differing priorities and strategies based on characteristics of the Principal Investigator such as gender, commercialization experience, and title, as well as the type of biomedical technology. We also find empirical evidence that greater levels of PoCC support is associated with a higher frequency of licensing agreements. These findings contribute to a broader understanding of the role PoCCs have in promoting academic commercialization in the biomedical technology sector and insight into the determinants of varying trajectories of projects funded by PoCCs in pursuit of commercialization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Transfer","volume":"50 6","pages":"2509-2531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10187-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proof of Concept Centers (PoCCs) are important mechanisms for supporting technology transfer and enabling the commercialization efforts of academic innovators. However, there is limited evidence on the success of PoCCs in supporting projects towards commercialization, especially in the life sciences. We examine how principal investigator (PI) and technology characteristics impact initial actions and commercialization strategies within a PoCC. Through a unique data set that tracks 275 biomedical technologies funded by the National Institutes of Health Centers for Accelerated Innovations (NCAI) and Research Evaluation and Commercialization Hubs (REACH), we find evidence of differing priorities and strategies based on characteristics of the Principal Investigator such as gender, commercialization experience, and title, as well as the type of biomedical technology. We also find empirical evidence that greater levels of PoCC support is associated with a higher frequency of licensing agreements. These findings contribute to a broader understanding of the role PoCCs have in promoting academic commercialization in the biomedical technology sector and insight into the determinants of varying trajectories of projects funded by PoCCs in pursuit of commercialization.

走向商业化的道路:来自NIH概念验证中心的证据。
概念验证中心(pocc)是支持技术转让和使学术创新者的商业化努力成为可能的重要机制。然而,关于pocc在支持项目走向商业化方面取得成功的证据有限,特别是在生命科学领域。我们研究了首席研究员(PI)和技术特征如何影响PoCC内的初始行动和商业化战略。通过追踪由美国国立卫生研究院加速创新中心(NCAI)和研究评估与商业化中心(REACH)资助的275项生物医学技术的独特数据集,我们发现了基于首席研究员的特征(如性别、商业化经验、头衔以及生物医学技术类型)的不同优先级和策略的证据。我们还发现经验证据表明,更高水平的PoCC支持与更高频率的许可协议相关。这些发现有助于更广泛地了解pocc在促进生物医学技术领域学术商业化方面的作用,并深入了解由pocc资助的项目追求商业化的不同轨迹的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Transfer provides an international forum for research on the economic, managerial and policy implication of technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and innovation. The Journal is especially interested in articles that focus on the relationship between the external environment and organizations (governments, public agencies, firms, universities) and their innovation process. The Journal welcomes alternative modes of presentation ranging from broad empirical analyses, to theoretical models, to case studies based on theoretical foundations.  Officially cited as: J Technol Transf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书