Comparison between single-shot and gradual dilation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-31 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.0256
Kharisma Prasetya Adhyatma, Muhammad Ainul Mahfuz, Dianita Halimah Harahap, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli, Fauriski Febrian Prapiska
{"title":"Comparison between single-shot and gradual dilation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kharisma Prasetya Adhyatma, Muhammad Ainul Mahfuz, Dianita Halimah Harahap, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli, Fauriski Febrian Prapiska","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is efficacious for the management of bigger or complex renal calculi. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of single-shot dilation (one-shot - OD) against gradual dilation (multiple - MD) in fluoroscopy-guided PCNL, with the objective of enhancing stone management techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive study adhering to PRISMA criteria concentrated on adult patients receiving conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy for nephrolithiasis. Included were clinical trials and cohort studies comparing OD and MD approaches, but omitting ultrasound-guided, mini, and micro-PCNL methods. Investigations were performed in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Medline from 2008 onwards. Two reviewers independently evaluated and extracted data, employing the Cochrane ROB2 and ROBINS-I instruments for quality evaluation. Statistical analyses utilizing Review Manager 5.4 employed fixed and random-effects models contingent upon heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) including 572 individuals with OD and 581 patients with MD were examined. The meta-analysis indicated a markedly reduced complication rate in the OD group (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.94; p = 0.01), with no statistically significant difference in stone-free rates (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97-1.08; p = 0.49). Variations in hemoglobin reduction, duration of hospitalization, fluoroscopy exposure, and surgical time were noted. However, the significant variability requires cautious interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The single-shot dilation approach showed a markedly reduced complication rate, indicating it as a safer option for adult patients having conventional PCNL. Additional research is required to corroborate these results across various clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 3","pages":"373-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12663817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is efficacious for the management of bigger or complex renal calculi. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of single-shot dilation (one-shot - OD) against gradual dilation (multiple - MD) in fluoroscopy-guided PCNL, with the objective of enhancing stone management techniques.

Material and methods: A comprehensive study adhering to PRISMA criteria concentrated on adult patients receiving conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy for nephrolithiasis. Included were clinical trials and cohort studies comparing OD and MD approaches, but omitting ultrasound-guided, mini, and micro-PCNL methods. Investigations were performed in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Medline from 2008 onwards. Two reviewers independently evaluated and extracted data, employing the Cochrane ROB2 and ROBINS-I instruments for quality evaluation. Statistical analyses utilizing Review Manager 5.4 employed fixed and random-effects models contingent upon heterogeneity (I2).

Results: Sixteen studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) including 572 individuals with OD and 581 patients with MD were examined. The meta-analysis indicated a markedly reduced complication rate in the OD group (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.94; p = 0.01), with no statistically significant difference in stone-free rates (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97-1.08; p = 0.49). Variations in hemoglobin reduction, duration of hospitalization, fluoroscopy exposure, and surgical time were noted. However, the significant variability requires cautious interpretation.

Conclusions: The single-shot dilation approach showed a markedly reduced complication rate, indicating it as a safer option for adult patients having conventional PCNL. Additional research is required to corroborate these results across various clinical environments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮肾镜取石术中单次和渐进式扩张技术的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗较大或复杂肾结石的有效方法。本研究评估了在透视引导下PCNL中单次扩张(one-shot - OD)与逐步扩张(multiple - MD)的安全性和有效性,目的是提高结石管理技术。材料和方法:一项遵循PRISMA标准的综合性研究,集中于接受常规经皮肾镜取石治疗肾结石的成年患者。纳入了比较OD和MD方法的临床试验和队列研究,但忽略了超声引导、微型和微型pcnl方法。从2008年起在PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和Medline进行调查。两名审稿人独立评估和提取数据,采用Cochrane ROB2和ROBINS-I工具进行质量评价。利用Review Manager 5.4进行统计分析时,根据异质性采用固定效应和随机效应模型(I2)。结果:共纳入16项研究(14项随机对照试验和2项队列研究),包括572例OD患者和581例MD患者。meta分析显示,OD组并发症发生率明显降低(RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.94; p = 0.01),无结石清除率差异无统计学意义(RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97-1.08; p = 0.49)。血红蛋白降低、住院时间、透视暴露和手术时间的变化被记录下来。然而,这种显著的可变性需要谨慎的解释。结论:单次扩张入路明显降低了并发症发生率,表明它是常规PCNL成人患者更安全的选择。需要进一步的研究在不同的临床环境中证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书