Efficiency and safety of microscopic cluster ligation of the internal spermatic veins: A prospective matched case-control study.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-31 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.0163
Wang Jingkai, Xu Peng, Wang Hailuo, Zhang Ruoran, Pang Kun
{"title":"Efficiency and safety of microscopic cluster ligation of the internal spermatic veins: A prospective matched case-control study.","authors":"Wang Jingkai, Xu Peng, Wang Hailuo, Zhang Ruoran, Pang Kun","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical efficacy and safety of microscopic cluster ligation of the spermatic vein (MCLSV), and to compare the similarities and differences between MCLSV and microscopic traditional branch ligation of the spermatic vein (MTBLSV).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective matched case-control study of 91 patients with bilateral varicocele was conducted. Participants underwent microscopic bilateral spermatic vein ligation and were randomly assigned by computer to undergo MCLSV on one side and MTBLSV on the other. The operative outcomes of the two techniques were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operative time of MCLSV was significantly lower than that of MTBLSV (p <0.001). Postoperative day 1 VAS scores at the operative site in MCLSV were significantly lower than MTBLSV (p <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of spermatic vein ligations, the number of internal spermatic arteries and lymphatics, complications, occurrence of foreign body sensation of wire knots, improvement of scrotal pain and distant recurrence (p >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with MTBLSV, MCLSV can significantly shorten surgical time, improve surgical efficiency, and alleviate postoperative perineal pain and discomfort in patients while ensuring surgical safety and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 3","pages":"429-433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12663800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical efficacy and safety of microscopic cluster ligation of the spermatic vein (MCLSV), and to compare the similarities and differences between MCLSV and microscopic traditional branch ligation of the spermatic vein (MTBLSV).

Material and methods: A prospective matched case-control study of 91 patients with bilateral varicocele was conducted. Participants underwent microscopic bilateral spermatic vein ligation and were randomly assigned by computer to undergo MCLSV on one side and MTBLSV on the other. The operative outcomes of the two techniques were compared.

Results: The operative time of MCLSV was significantly lower than that of MTBLSV (p <0.001). Postoperative day 1 VAS scores at the operative site in MCLSV were significantly lower than MTBLSV (p <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of spermatic vein ligations, the number of internal spermatic arteries and lymphatics, complications, occurrence of foreign body sensation of wire knots, improvement of scrotal pain and distant recurrence (p >0.05).

Conclusions: Compared with MTBLSV, MCLSV can significantly shorten surgical time, improve surgical efficiency, and alleviate postoperative perineal pain and discomfort in patients while ensuring surgical safety and effectiveness.

Abstract Image

精索内静脉显微结扎的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性匹配病例对照研究。
前言:本研究旨在评价精索静脉显微丛状结扎术(MCLSV)的手术疗效和安全性,并比较MCLSV与传统精索静脉显微分支结扎术(MTBLSV)的异同。材料与方法:对91例双侧精索静脉曲张患者进行前瞻性匹配病例对照研究。参与者接受显微镜下的双侧精索静脉结扎,并通过计算机随机分配一侧接受MCLSV,另一侧接受MTBLSV。比较两种方法的手术效果。结果:MCLSV的手术时间明显低于MTBLSV (p < 0.05)。结论:与MTBLSV相比,MCLSV可显著缩短手术时间,提高手术效率,减轻患者术后会阴疼痛和不适,同时保证手术的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书