Late relapse of testicular germ cell tumor: An individual patient data meta-analysis of disease characteristics, treatments, and oncological outcomes.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-31 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2025.0069
Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Nirmish Singla, Siamak Daneshmand, Axel Heidenreich, Aditya Bagrodia, Vitaly Margulis, Akihiro Matsukawa, Ichiro Tsuboi, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"Late relapse of testicular germ cell tumor: An individual patient data meta-analysis of disease characteristics, treatments, and oncological outcomes.","authors":"Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Nirmish Singla, Siamak Daneshmand, Axel Heidenreich, Aditya Bagrodia, Vitaly Margulis, Akihiro Matsukawa, Ichiro Tsuboi, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2025.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Late relapse (LR) of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is a relatively rare event with limited data to help refine evidence-based decision-making. This individual patient data meta-analysis aims to analyze disease characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors affecting oncological outcomes of TGCT patients suffering from LR.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic search and individual patient data gathering was performed. The primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies, comprising 240 patients, were selected for review. In multivariable analysis, surveillance as primary management of TGCT was associated with a higher risk of retroperitoneal LR (OR = 10.08, 95% CI: 2.34-43.31). On univariable analyses, longer time to LR, LR multiplicity, and chemotherapy (as the sole treatment of LR) were significantly associated with worse DFS and CSS, while pure teratoma at LR, teratoma element at LR, surgery (as the sole treatment of LR), and surgery-based combination treatment of LR were significantly associated with better DFS and CSS. Salvage chemotherapy for LR was associated with worse DFS and CSS compared to first-line chemotherapy in multivariable cox regression analysis (HR = 13.03, 95% CI: 1.13-150.25). Two decision-tree models are proposed to help shared decision making regarding chemotherapy-based vs surgery-only and surgery-based versus combination treatments; the accuracies of these models were 0.94 and 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available data suggest a benefits to surgery alone or surgery-based combination therapy compared to chemotherapy alone for LR of TGCT. We propose decision-tree models to help clinical decision-making in TGCT patients with LR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 3","pages":"289-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12663810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2025.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Late relapse (LR) of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is a relatively rare event with limited data to help refine evidence-based decision-making. This individual patient data meta-analysis aims to analyze disease characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors affecting oncological outcomes of TGCT patients suffering from LR.

Material and methods: A systematic search and individual patient data gathering was performed. The primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: A total of 12 studies, comprising 240 patients, were selected for review. In multivariable analysis, surveillance as primary management of TGCT was associated with a higher risk of retroperitoneal LR (OR = 10.08, 95% CI: 2.34-43.31). On univariable analyses, longer time to LR, LR multiplicity, and chemotherapy (as the sole treatment of LR) were significantly associated with worse DFS and CSS, while pure teratoma at LR, teratoma element at LR, surgery (as the sole treatment of LR), and surgery-based combination treatment of LR were significantly associated with better DFS and CSS. Salvage chemotherapy for LR was associated with worse DFS and CSS compared to first-line chemotherapy in multivariable cox regression analysis (HR = 13.03, 95% CI: 1.13-150.25). Two decision-tree models are proposed to help shared decision making regarding chemotherapy-based vs surgery-only and surgery-based versus combination treatments; the accuracies of these models were 0.94 and 0.88.

Conclusions: Available data suggest a benefits to surgery alone or surgery-based combination therapy compared to chemotherapy alone for LR of TGCT. We propose decision-tree models to help clinical decision-making in TGCT patients with LR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤晚期复发:疾病特征、治疗和肿瘤预后的个体患者数据荟萃分析
睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤(TGCT)的晚期复发(LR)是一种相对罕见的事件,数据有限,无法帮助完善循证决策。本个体患者数据荟萃分析旨在分析患有LR的TGCT患者的疾病特征、治疗方式和影响肿瘤预后的因素。材料和方法:进行了系统的检索和个体患者资料收集。主要终点为无病生存期(DFS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。结果:共纳入12项研究,240例患者。在多变量分析中,监测作为TGCT的主要管理与较高的腹膜后LR风险相关(OR = 10.08, 95% CI: 2.34-43.31)。在单变量分析中,较长的LR时间、LR多样性和化疗(作为LR的唯一治疗方法)与较差的DFS和CSS显著相关,而LR的纯粹畸胎瘤、LR的畸胎瘤成分、手术(作为LR的唯一治疗方法)和基于手术的LR联合治疗与较好的DFS和CSS显著相关。多变量cox回归分析显示,与一线化疗相比,挽救性LR化疗与更差的DFS和CSS相关(HR = 13.03, 95% CI: 1.13-150.25)。提出了两种决策树模型,以帮助在以化疗为基础与单纯手术、以手术为基础与联合治疗之间做出共同决策;模型的精度分别为0.94和0.88。结论:现有数据表明,与单纯化疗相比,单纯手术或以手术为基础的联合治疗对TGCT LR有好处。我们提出决策树模型来帮助TGCT患者LR的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书