Treatment strategies for Boerhaave syndrome: multinational retrospective cohort study.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Tobias Hauge,Aram Abu Hejleh,Alberto Aiolfi,Felix Berlth,Luigi Bonavina,Linda Brake,Lena-Christin Conradi,Xavier Benoit D'Journo,David Edholm,Jessie Elliot,Wietse Eshuis,Nora Friedrich,Suzanne Gisbertz,Peter Grimminger,Christian Alexander Gutschow,Shantanu Joglekar,Bastiaan Klarenbeek,Fredrik Klevebro,Cezanne D Kooij,Misha Luyer,Alfio Milazzo,Lucia Moletta,Johnny Moons,Krishna Moorthy,Beat P Müller-Stich,Henrik Nienhüser,Philippe Nafteux,Giulia Nezi,Raphael Nico,Kerstin J Neuschütz,Grard Nieuwenhuijzen,Nicola Raftery,Franziska Renger,Ioannis Rouvelas,Jelle P Ruurda,Marcel A Schneider,Daniela Polette Stubb,Alban Todesco,Michele Valmasoni,Mark I van Berge Henegouwen,Elke van Daele,Richard van Hillegersberg,Sander J M van Hootegem,Hanne Vanommeslaeghe,Julie Veziant,Bas Wijnhoven,João Pedro Vilela,Christiane J Bruns,Magnus Nilsson,Wolfgang Schröder
{"title":"Treatment strategies for Boerhaave syndrome: multinational retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tobias Hauge,Aram Abu Hejleh,Alberto Aiolfi,Felix Berlth,Luigi Bonavina,Linda Brake,Lena-Christin Conradi,Xavier Benoit D'Journo,David Edholm,Jessie Elliot,Wietse Eshuis,Nora Friedrich,Suzanne Gisbertz,Peter Grimminger,Christian Alexander Gutschow,Shantanu Joglekar,Bastiaan Klarenbeek,Fredrik Klevebro,Cezanne D Kooij,Misha Luyer,Alfio Milazzo,Lucia Moletta,Johnny Moons,Krishna Moorthy,Beat P Müller-Stich,Henrik Nienhüser,Philippe Nafteux,Giulia Nezi,Raphael Nico,Kerstin J Neuschütz,Grard Nieuwenhuijzen,Nicola Raftery,Franziska Renger,Ioannis Rouvelas,Jelle P Ruurda,Marcel A Schneider,Daniela Polette Stubb,Alban Todesco,Michele Valmasoni,Mark I van Berge Henegouwen,Elke van Daele,Richard van Hillegersberg,Sander J M van Hootegem,Hanne Vanommeslaeghe,Julie Veziant,Bas Wijnhoven,João Pedro Vilela,Christiane J Bruns,Magnus Nilsson,Wolfgang Schröder","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nBoerhaave syndrome is defined as a spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus. The mainstay of treatment is resuscitation of the patient, closure of the oesophageal defect, and drainage of perioesophageal and pleural fluid collections. Whether the optimal approach is endoscopic, surgical, or conservative management remains unknown and there are no clear guidelines. The aim of this multicentre retrospective cohort study was to evaluate current treatment strategies and outcomes for Boerhaave syndrome.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA multicentre retrospective analysis of data from 23 participating European tertiary centres was performed. Patients with Boerhaave syndrome treated between January 2019 and December 2023 were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the length of ICU stay and secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, and the length of overall hospital stay.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn total, 216 patients were included; 151 were men (70%), the median age was 62 (22-95) years, and 81 (40%) were treated >24 h after the start of symptoms. Seventy (32%) patients were managed endoscopically (group I), 73 (34%) were managed surgically (group II), 67 (31%) were managed using a combination of endoscopy and surgery (group III), and 6 (3%) were managed using other methods (group IV). For patients in groups I-III: the median length of ICU stay was 8 (0-67) days, with no differences between the three groups (P = 0.105); the in-hospital mortality rate and 90-day mortality rate were both 12% (P = 0.490 and P = 0.637, respectively); and the median length of overall hospital stay was 27 (range 1-193) days, with the longest stays observed in patients who received combined treatment (P = 0.032).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis study provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment strategies and outcomes for patients with Boerhaave syndrome in Europe.","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Boerhaave syndrome is defined as a spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus. The mainstay of treatment is resuscitation of the patient, closure of the oesophageal defect, and drainage of perioesophageal and pleural fluid collections. Whether the optimal approach is endoscopic, surgical, or conservative management remains unknown and there are no clear guidelines. The aim of this multicentre retrospective cohort study was to evaluate current treatment strategies and outcomes for Boerhaave syndrome. METHODS A multicentre retrospective analysis of data from 23 participating European tertiary centres was performed. Patients with Boerhaave syndrome treated between January 2019 and December 2023 were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the length of ICU stay and secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, and the length of overall hospital stay. RESULTS In total, 216 patients were included; 151 were men (70%), the median age was 62 (22-95) years, and 81 (40%) were treated >24 h after the start of symptoms. Seventy (32%) patients were managed endoscopically (group I), 73 (34%) were managed surgically (group II), 67 (31%) were managed using a combination of endoscopy and surgery (group III), and 6 (3%) were managed using other methods (group IV). For patients in groups I-III: the median length of ICU stay was 8 (0-67) days, with no differences between the three groups (P = 0.105); the in-hospital mortality rate and 90-day mortality rate were both 12% (P = 0.490 and P = 0.637, respectively); and the median length of overall hospital stay was 27 (range 1-193) days, with the longest stays observed in patients who received combined treatment (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment strategies and outcomes for patients with Boerhaave syndrome in Europe.
Boerhaave综合征的治疗策略:多国回顾性队列研究。
背景:布尔哈夫综合征被定义为自发性食道穿孔。主要的治疗方法是复苏病人,关闭食管缺损,引流食管和胸膜积液。最佳的方法是内窥镜、手术还是保守治疗仍然未知,也没有明确的指导方针。本多中心回顾性队列研究的目的是评估Boerhaave综合征的当前治疗策略和结果。方法对来自23个欧洲高等教育中心的多中心回顾性分析。2019年1月至2023年12月期间接受Boerhaave综合征治疗的患者符合纳入条件。主要终点是ICU住院时间,次要终点包括住院死亡率、90天死亡率和总住院时间。结果共纳入216例患者;151例为男性(70%),中位年龄为62(22-95)岁,81例(40%)在症状开始24小时后接受治疗。70例(32%)患者采用内窥镜治疗(I组),73例(34%)患者采用手术治疗(II组),67例(31%)患者采用内窥镜和手术联合治疗(III组),6例(3%)患者采用其他方法治疗(IV组)。I-III组患者ICU住院时间中位数为8(0-67)天,三组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.105);住院死亡率和90天死亡率均为12% (P = 0.490和P = 0.637);总住院时间中位数为27天(范围1 ~ 193天),其中联合治疗组住院时间最长(P = 0.032)。结论:本研究全面概述了目前欧洲Boerhaave综合征患者的治疗策略和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书